Autumn forecast 2010 - Treasury Contents


Written evidence submitted by George Buckley, Chief UK Economist, Deutsche Bank

THE ECONOMIC FORECASTS

The OBR's latest forecasts for economic growth were revised down slightly in the near-term, but looking further ahead they remain more optimistic than most other forecasters (see chart below). That's not to say that strong growth rebounds don't happen - looking back over 200 years of data GDP tends to bounce by around 3% yoy on average in the two years following a recession.

How the OBR growth forecasts compare


As such, the OBR's near-term growth forecasts to us look reasonable (the OBR describes the recovery as slow by historical standards). However, we might question the OBR's strong medium-term view. In particular, the robust recovery in investment (due to replacement, the restarting of delayed projects and an encouraging corporate financial position) may yet be threatened by a still very uncertain global outlook (notably in the euro area). On global growth, the OBR's forecasts are very similar (slightly lower, in fact) to those of the IMF.

The OBR expressed uncertainty about the persistence of the strong growth outturns in Q2 and Q3 2010. In this respect it is worth noting that following the 1980s recession (which was similar in duration and scale to the recent fall in output) the recovery was very patchy indeed - we saw quarters of very strong growth interspersed with quarters where there was no growth at all. A similar volatile recovery might be in store this time round.

There are a number of key downside risks to growth, in our opinion: i) the direct hit from fiscal consolidation, ii) the possibility that credit availability takes time to recover, iii) fallout from a broadening or deepening of the euro area banking/sovereign crisis, iv) high public and private sector debt levels (research by Reinhart & Rogoff suggests that higher public debt/GDP ratios are associated with notably slower economic growth), and v) and the need for further rebalancing in the financial and household sectors (note the recent fall in the saving ratio and the possibility of continued falls in house prices).

Key upside risks are: i) DB's "credit impulse" research suggests we can see strong growth even if de-leveraging continues (for this to happen de-leveraging just needs to proceed more slowly), ii) the huge amount of stimulus already injected into the UK economy (Bank Rate at historic lows, quantitative easing worth 14% of GDP and a sharply weaker currency) and iii) the better performance of employment than the fall in GDP would have suggested.

The OBR considers two alternative growth scenarios. "Delayed Rebalancing" assumes stronger consumption (among other things) but to the extent that this could store up further problems for the future, GDP growth could end up being weaker looking ahead (the OBR assumes growth remains in line with the base case). In the "Persistent Weak Demand" case the OBR has cut baseline growth by 0.3pp to 0.5pp; still, from 2012 onwards growth is still stronger than consensus views.

Forecasts for the output gap appear reasonable, based on a cautious view of potential growth. For example, between 2010 and 2012 the OBR forecasts an average gap of -3.2%. This is more negative than the IMF (-2.3%) but less negative that that of the OECD (-3.9%). Potential growth is assumed to be 2.35% (which is roughly the long-run average rate of growth since the 1950s) falling to 2.1% by 2014 on account of demographics.

The OBR sees total employment rising by over 1m by 2015, which implies job growth of 1% yoy from 2012 to 2015. That is twice the long-run average rate of growth (0.5%) over the past 40 years. This might prove optimistic at a time of significant public sector job losses (albeit fewer following the Spending Review). Also, with firms having hoarded labour during the downturn (causing sharp falls in productivity), the recovery phase might equally see fewer jobs being created. That said, the OBR does forecast a near-term rise in the unemployment rate.

An important risk relates to interest rates and inflation. The OBR assumes that short-term interest rates follow the path implied by the market, but if above-target inflation persists then the Bank of England may not be able to keep rates as low for as long as the market believes. Nonetheless, DB's view is for only a gradual tightening in monetary policy from mid-2011.

THE PUBLIC FINANCE FORECASTS

Based on the OBR's economic view, from a top-down perspective the forecasts for the headline budget deficit (PSNB, % of GDP) look appropriate (see chart below). If consensus expectations for GDP growth were used then the deficit would of course be higher, particularly in the final years of the forecast when the OBR's GDP forecasts diverge the most from consensus.

The OBR made few changes to its overall deficit forecasts in its latest forecast round. The deficit is still seen falling to around 1% by the end of the forecast horizon, while the cyclically-adjusted PSNB continues to fall from just under 9% currently to close to zero by 2015-16.

So far this fiscal year (ie the seven months to October), the PSNB has come in on average £1bn per month lower than a year ago. If this pattern is repeated for the remaining five months of 2010-11 then the deficit would be £133 billion for the full year, £15 billion lower than the OBR's current forecast of £148.5 billion. The central government cash deficit too has shown signs of improvement. Alongside increased flows into NS&I products this raises the risk that the Debt Management Office (DMO) may end up over-funding the 2010-11 deficit. Given the likelihood of i) a similarly large financing requirement in 2011-12, ii) a substantial amount of euro area funding expected to come to the market in H1 2011, and iii) bond yields set to rise as the economy continues to recover (note that the OBR estimates 1pp on gilt yields raises borrowing by £5 billion per year by the end of the forecast horizon), an over-fund this year would not necessarily be a bad thing.

What will the impact of the austerity programme be on the economy? It is interesting to note that previous consolidations in the (relatively) recent past have not been associated with slow economic growth, as shown in the chart below. In the aftermath of both the 1981 Budget and tightening during the course of much of the 1990s economic growth averaged well above its long run trend (in 1982-84 growth averaged close to 3%, and from 1994-99 it stood at close to 3.4%). That is not to say that fiscal consolidations cause stronger growth via negative multipliers more than offsetting the direct hit from tighter fiscal policy. Rather, that in the aftermath of recession-induced fiscal blow-outs, other policies tend to support economic growth during the period of fiscal correction (this time, as last, monetary policy has been significantly loosened while the exchange rate depreciated sharply).

This time round the focus of the consolidation has been on spending cuts (with more limited tax increases) for a number of reasons, including: i) research (by the IMF among others) suggesting spending cuts are better for medium-term growth than higher taxes, ii) government outlays as a portion of GDP are high, having risen sharply from 36% in 2000 (in the lowest quartile of OECD countries) to 53% now (in the highest quartile).

There remains an issue of how the spending cuts are communicated to the public. I recently conducted a straw poll of a group of economically informed individuals, almost all of whom thought that total cash spending by the government was to be cut over the next five years. In fact, based on the government's plans, total managed expenditure in nominal terms is forecast by the OBR to rise during every year of the current parliament. Perhaps such expectations are negatively impacting confidence.

Notwithstanding the OBR's generally optimistic forecasts for growth and employment during the forecast horizon, we have little reason to doubt the analysis of the OBR that the government will achieve its new fiscal mandate - ie to achieve cyclically adjusted current balance and falling net debt/GDP by 2015-16.

December 2010



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 28 January 2011