Principles of tax policy - Treasury Contents


Written evidence submitted by TheCityUK

ABOUT THECITYUK

The purpose of TheCityUK is to champion the international competitiveness of the financial services sector and to promote the sector globally.

—  Overseas—by promoting the UK in overseas markets as a world-class centre for financial services.

—  At home—by working to increase understanding of, and ensure the effectiveness of, the contribution that the financial services sector makes to the wider economy and society as a whole.

—  In regulation and market access negotiations—by providing a voice for the sector and working to improve access to overseas markets for UK firms.

TheCityUK's strategic priorities are set by the Board of Directors, chaired by Stuart Popham, Senior Partner at international law firm, Clifford Chance.

Oversight is provided by the Advisory Council, chaired by Sir Win Bischoff, Chairman of Lloyds Banking Group.

1.  INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1  TheCityUK welcomes the opportunity to submit views as part of the Treasury Select Committee Inquiry. The competitiveness of the UK tax regime has been identified by the TheCItyUK's membership as a key priority for the UK Financial Services Industry.

1.2  This is reflected in the recommendations of various industry reports in recent years, including the Bischoff Reporti and the Wigley Reportii, both of which highlighted the significant role played by the taxation system in sending signals to foreign investors about the attractiveness of the UK as a place to do business.

1.3  TheCityUK welcomes the Coalition Government's commitment to promoting the competitiveness of the UK tax system in a measured way reflecting the fiscal challenges currently facing the UK.

1.4  This submission has three sections including this introduction. The second section examines how UK taxation impacts the business environment that financial services firms operate in, and assesses the impact of the current tax framework and recent changes in tax policy on the competitiveness of the UK as a location for Financial Services firms to do business.

1.5  In the final section, the report identifies three specific priority areas for changes in tax policy which could substantially improve the business environment for the UK Financial Services sector, recover some of the recent loss in competitiveness of the UK, and in so doing support growth in Financial Services and the wider economy.

1.6  TheCityUK looks forward to working with the Select Committee throughout its enquiry. If the Committee has any questions on this submission, or would like further evidence from TheCityUK, please contact Howard Miller, Director of UK Strategy.

2.  TAXATION AND THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT FOR UK FINANCIAL SERVICES FIRMS

2.1  Taxation has been identified as one of the most important factors taken into consideration by Financial Services firms when making investments, and affects firms' decisions from locating particular teams, activities and businesses, through to the location for their European or global headquarters.

2.2  The significance of the taxation environment has been reflected in many studies into the competitiveness of the Financial Services industry, for example a recommendation of the Bischoff report was "to generate strong engagement between the Government and the industry, in order to ensure that the UK tax system remains stable, sustainable and competitive in the long term".

2.3  Financial Services firms and employees are highly mobile, and choose to locate in jurisdictions which are conducive to their business activities. Important considerations include the legal, regulatory and taxation system, openness to trade, immigration and foreign ownership, and a globally-connected communications infrastructure.

2.4  This international mobility has allowed the growth of UK Financial Services into a global leader. The UK environment of stable & competitive taxation has historically been extremely attractive to financial firms and to the highly skilled financial services workforce. There are in fact a number of examples of unfavourable taxation regimes elsewhere causing financial services activity to migrate to the UK, such as the establishment of the Eurobond market in the UK in the 1960s in response to the US Interest Equalisation Tax.

2.5  Accordingly, the impact of UK tax policy on the Financial Services industry must be set in an international context. There are many countries that are seeking to emulate the UK's success in building a leading financial services sector. These countries are engaged in a global "war of attraction" and are making substantial investments, and reshaping their legal, regulatory and taxation environment in order to attract Financial Services firms and employees.

2.6  Against this backdrop of increasing international competition for financial services investment, recent changes to the UK tax regime have undermined the competitive position of the UK.

2.7  Speaking at the Deloitte Tax Directors Academy on 23 November 2010 David Gauke, the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, commented that "If we look back to 1997, the UK had the tenth lowest main rate of corporation tax among the current EU27 countries. By the time we came to office, we'd slipped to 20th". As Mr Gauke comments "Other countries had cut their rates further and faster than we had, with the UK's competitive advantage being slowly eroded away".

2.8  In its Global Competitiveness Survey for 2010, the World Economic Forum ranks the UK 95th out of 139 countries in its league table of the impact of taxation on incentives to work and invest.

3.  TAX POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS TO RESTORE COMPETITIVENESS

3.1  TheCityUK has identified three areas of priority for changes in tax policy which can help to restore UK competitiveness, and enable the UK to continue to be an attractive location for investment by global financial services firms. These priorities are to increase consultation and transparency, to remove disincentives on investment in SMEs, and to set out a road map for increasing UK tax competitiveness.

Increased consultation and transparency

3.2  The tax system must offer transparency so that taxpayers have certainty over what they are required to pay in advance, to allow for proper financial planning, and to ensure that the government's process of taxation is not seen to be arbitrary. UK tax policy has departed from this path on several fronts in recent years with a lack of transparency and certainty in respect of changes to Capital Gains Tax, the taxation of non-domiciled workers and the much debated levy on bank bonuses.

3.3  In a report prepared for the International Regulatory Strategy Groupiii, Charles River Associates assesses the way in which the predictability and competitiveness of the UK tax regime impact upon the financial services industry. The report concludes that "Whilst the scale of overall tax burden is a key consideration, it is clear from this report that our top priority must be to restore the perception of predictability and certainty that has for so long underpinned the UK tax regime".

3.4  TheCityUK welcomes the approach taken by HM Treasury in assessing reform of corporate taxation. The pre-legislative consultation of tax professionals promises to be highly constructive in the development of good tax policy and in restoring trust between taxpayers and policymakers.

3.5  Whilst the approach taken to corporate taxation reform is a positive step, the Select Committee should be aware that the investment decisions of Financial Services firms take all elements of taxation into account. Although the Financial Services sector makes the largest contribution to corporate tax receipts, personal and other taxes represents 90% of total taxation on the industryiv.

3.6  TheCityUK proposes that the consultative approach to reform of corporate taxation should be extended by HM Treasury to all future reviews of taxation.

Remove disincentives for investment in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs)

3.7  TheCityUK believes that increasing the access to finance for SMEs forms an important part of the Government's growth agenda, and proposes the removal of barriers and disincentives to investment in SMEs, such as relaxing restrictions on the Venture Capital Trust (VCT) regime and allowing unlisted securities (eg, AIM and Plus-quoted markets) to be held in Individual Savings Accounts.

3.8  In its response to the joint HMT/ BIS Green Paper on "Financing a Private Sector Recovery", the London Stock Exchange Group observes that changes to the VCT regime in 2006 had a negative effect on investment in SMEs. "These restrictions are putting artificial caps on growth as they may prevent businesses from recruiting more staff or expanding through acquisition because, in many cases, they become ineligible for investment by the VCT managers that have provided their initial funding."

3.9  Other taxes on equity investment include Stamp Duty Reserve Tax, levied as 0.5% of the value of every purchase of UK shares, and the withdrawal in 1997 of the right of Pension Funds to reclaim tax withheld on payment of corporate dividends (Dividend Tax Credit). These taxes reduce returns for individual investors and pension funds investing in UK companies, and a large amount of research exists showing how their removal would increase investment in UK companies, and reduce their cost of capital.

A road map for increasing UK tax competitiveness

3.10  By tax competitiveness we refer to both the overall level of taxation and to the complexity of the tax system. By both of these metrics, the direction of travel has been a worsening in competitiveness, with an increase in personal and employment tax rates, and greater complexity such as the proposed pension reforms.

3.11  The CityUK welcomes more recent moves by the Government to address concerns over the need to simplify the UK tax code. The work of the Office of Tax Simplification has revealed that there are over 1,000 reliefs in the UK tax system adding to the complexity of tax administration and compliance. The Government's commitment to assess the benefits of these reliefs and the streamline the tax system where possible is to be welcomed.

3.12  Whilst the current fiscal environment may limit the scope for reductions in the overall level of taxation in the short-term, TheCityUK believes that Government should provide a clear road map for reducing the overall tax burden as the economy and public sector finances recover. The road map should include a commitment to review the 50% rate of income tax in this Parliament.

3.13  Government and the corporate sector have a shared interest in stimulating economic growth. A firm commitment to restoring UK tax competitiveness would be a significant step to creating a positive environment for business investment in the UK, forming the basis for future growth.

January 2011

REFERENCES

Bischoff Report: UK International Financial Services—the Future, May 2009

Wigley Report: London: Winning in a Changing World—Review of the Competitiveness of London's Financial Centre, June 2008

Charles River Associates "Taxation of the Financial Services Industry: Predictability and Competitiveness", October 2010

PwC, "The Total Tax Contribution of UK Financial Services, Third edition", December 2010


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 15 March 2011