The Severn Crossings Toll - Welsh Affairs Committee Contents


Written evidence from the Federation of Small Businesses

  I would like to inform you that The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) commissioned Aberystwyth University to investigate the economic impact of the Severn bridge tolls on the economy. I believe this research will be of much benefit to the Committee.

  I would like to point out some highlights of the research. There are several general policy conclusions and options to be drawn from the arguments presented during the research:

  Firstly, there is a general case to be made for the systematic management of the road transport network in order to promote efficiency and economic welfare. If capital costs are to be recovered through charging then, logically, on grounds of equity, all road enhancements should recover their cost from proportionate charges, not simply those which are exceptionally expensive. Any new piece of road infrastructure brings benefits in terms of enhanced safety, improved access and reduced costs, and these considerations, alongside concerns to manage the financial cost of road building and repair, deal with the associated environmental consequences of increasing traffic, and regulate congestion, provide a platform for a system of universal road pricing. Yet, until a politically acceptable and practically feasible scheme for achieving this can be designed, piecemeal tolls and congestion charging will cause distortions which affect mobility and accessibility. While most will be of minor significance, some of the more acute of these emerge from our survey findings.

  Secondly, the importance of a European policy perspective emerges from our study. Unlike the case at Humber, where the Bridge divides a city and acts as an intra-urban link, the M4 crossing is a key through route, which is also highly significant in trans-European terms. Treating the crossing differently and continuing to levy a toll on the Bridge section of this route should be considered in the light of overall commercial circumstances in the EU, including comparative location conditions and the arrival of low cost Member states, which are already seen to pose a threat to business competitiveness in the UK. Interestingly, there is also some support among stakeholders for the development of a pan-European system of road pricing—if it is accepted that such charges are inevitable—which would create "a level playing field" for all EU commerce and enterprise.

  Thirdly, and as a consequence of the appreciably greater impact on businesses on the South Wales side of the Crossings, it is anomalous and inequitable that the Severn Bridge Act 1992 vests sole power with the Westminster Secretary of State for Transport, over the decision to end or modify the toll charges. Strategic supervision of national transport infrastructure (which is a legitimate function for the UK Government) needs to be balanced by consideration of the more pronounced local consequences: there should at least be a co-decision framework, involving the Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) and the Westminster Department of Transport who will effectively be co-owners of the crossings when the capital cost has eventually been defrayed. The well-known maxim that "devolution is a process, not an event" should focus attention on this anomaly, and as with rail transport issues, seek a greater voice for the devolved administration in determining issues of considerable local importance. An early inquiry by the Assembly's Economic Development and Transport Committee could establish the scope and relevance of any legal reform.

  The findings of this report indicate how important it is to more effectively communicate the rationale for continuing to charge a toll to users of the Crossings. It is now a common public perception that the cost of maintenance is a relatively small proportion (under 5%) of the toll revenues—and this report indicates that the cost of the charge falls disproportionately heavily on Welsh businesses.

  In terms of options for the future, however, recession and the squeeze on public spending make it highly unlikely that the annual revenue stream from the Severn Bridge toll of approximately £70 million will be given up lightly; furthermore a maintenance-only charge would probably cost more to collect than it would yield. Clearly, policy beyond 2016 is not clear cut and there is a strong case for reviewing the continuation of uniform charges—and for an opening up of the debate.

  So what are the real options with respect to removal, freezing, and real-terms reduction for policy development? In pragmatic terms, current legislation provides for the Westminster Department of Transport to have the sole power of decision; and a likely and welcome scenario might be a freezing of tolls in nominal terms, and limited take for five more years, post-amortisation. However, given the impact reported by businesses that are highly dependent on the Crossings, there are good arguments for a smarter approach, designed to offset detrimental impacts. This might include discounted toll rates for regular business usage; purchase of multi-trip toll cards; revision of the ratio of charges for different categories of vehicles to reduce costs for commercial traffic; and (although these would not be welcomed by the transport sector) peak time differentials.

  Finally, although revenues from the Seven Crossings toll will belong by statute to the Westminster Department of Transport and consequently would be absorbed by the Exchequer into income from general taxation, there is an undoubtedly strong moral basis for such proceeds to be shared with the Welsh Assembly Government. Additionally, since the charges are borne entirely by road users, there are highly persuasive arguments in support of the view that this share should be exclusively hypothecated to improvement of the Welsh transport infrastructure, either directly for road maintenance and improvement, or for the enhancement of public transport systems in a rational and integrated way throughout Wales, with the aim of promoting both social and economic objectives, minimising environmental impact and reducing road congestion.

October 2010





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 22 December 2010