The future of the Newport Passport Office - Welsh Affairs Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Veronica German AM

BACKGROUND

1.1  The Welsh Liberal Democrats and I noted with concern the announcement on 8 October that the Identity and Passport Service was intending to close its office in Newport and have opposed this decision from the outset.

1.2  I along with The Welsh Liberal Democrat group in the National Assembly have tabled a Statement of Opinion to encourage members of the National Assembly to express their opposition to the proposed closure. The party has also formally expressed its wish that "the proposal to close the Newport Passport office to be reversed". (See Appendices one and two).[12]

1.3  I have written a letter to The Rt Hon Cheryl Gillan MP, Secretary of State for Wales voicing my concern (Not printed).

1.4  Likewise, Newport City Council is opposed to the closure of the Newport Passport Office and the estimated loss of 300 jobs.

ARGUMENTS

2.1  I acknowledge that there are many arguments against the closure of the Newport Passport Office, but I have highlighted below the ones that I feel are most significant.

2.2  Three hundred jobs will be lost in Newport as a result of this decision. Compared to the location of other Passport Offices, Newport is relatively a more deprived area and the closure will have more of an impact on the local economy than elsewhere. For example, Newport was recently rated as the 28th most competitive city in the United Kingdom, despite receiving a significant boost in the last year.[13] I believe that therefore there will be a bigger impact on the local economy by the closure of the Newport Office than reductions in staffing numbers elsewhere. I fully support efforts to reduce the deficit but believe that the cost of doing so should be borne equitably by all parts of the UK.

2.3  There has been a drive over several decades to decentralise many government departments outside of areas with expensive land and labour costs. This has two benefits; firstly in cutting costs and secondly in spreading the mechanisms of government across many parts of the UK. I believe that the costs of owning or renting in Newport are substantially lower than in other parts of the country. In Newport grade A office space can cost as little as £8.50-£15.50 a square foot. The average price for office space in London's West End - IPS's London office - is around £75 a square foot. With this in mind I feel that the city must therefore be considered as a lower-cost alternative to other areas of the country.

2.4  This decision will leave Wales as the only nation in Europe without its own Passport Office. This will not only disadvantage many millions of people from Wales, and the south-west of England, who are able to use this office but will suggest that the IPS is not willing to spread its work across all of the United Kingdom.

2.5  I welcome the commitment to retain some kind of customer centre in Newport, but I still feel that Wales needs its own passport office in order to fully accommodate the requirements of a bilingual population to comply with the Welsh Language Act (1993). This states:

"Every public body […] shall prepare a scheme specifying the measures which it proposes to take, for the purpose […] of giving effect, so far as is both appropriate in the circumstances and reasonably practicable, to the principle that in the conduct of public business and the administration of justice in Wales the English and Welsh languages should be treated on a basis of equality."

It is essential to retain a passport office in Wales for ease of access not just to people in Wales but also people in the south west of England. Taking away this service in Newport could be the difference between a three hour round journey and a near ten hour round journey.

2.6  The staff performance has been excellent showing a willingness to embrace change and trial new systems when called upon. Newport was the regional office that always volunteered to do any innovative pilot, including the fast track system, which has now been rolled out across the United Kingdom.

CONCLUSION

3.1  In conclusion, I would like to re-iterate my opposition to the closure of the Newport Passport Office on the grounds that it does not meet important tests of economic impact, financial savings or maintaining the UK-wide nature of the IPS.

3.2  I understand the need for the best value for money from our public services in difficult times but I believe this must be done sensitively with the aim of providing an equitable service across the UK.

8 November 2010



12   Not printed. Back

13   Robert Huggins and Piers Thompson, UK Competitiveness Index 2010, (UWIC 2010). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 3 February 2011