Proposed Legislative Competence Orders relating to Organ Donation and Cycle Paths - Welsh Affairs Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Bernard Farrell-Roberts

I must admit to being extremely surprised that the Welsh Government is considering moving to such a radical new stance on the autonomous right of the individual to self-determination, especially when according to the research I have carried out there is no empirical evidence that demonstrates that such a move will lead to a raised availability of vital human organs for transplantation. The effects in countries where legislation has been introduced of this nature has been marginal, or in some cases negative, due to an adverse reaction to the State "assuming" a right to everyone's body post death.

In Spain, where assumed consent is the norm, there is no attempt to use the law as some successful civil suits called into question the right of the State to assume consent, following which other avenues were pursued and now they have the finest organ donation and transplantation system probably in the world, with a surplus of certain organ availability, and consent being requested in every case. This is a clear indication that no such change in the law is required, just a very professional organ transplantation system and organization.

I find the radical step of taking possession of all human bodies unless otherwise made explicit to be a very disturbing shift in the way the State treats individuals. Every individual, as part of their autonomous human right, must be able to determine what happens to their body in both life and death. The decision to donate part or all of that body should rest with the individual and be a positive and proactive act of giving by the individual, not a passive act of omission. This giving of self is a very fundamental and necessary part of human nature and society, and is always applauded by the rest of society. We should not take this away from the individual.

I encourage you very strongly not to change the laws as they stand on this point. To do so would not only be a gesture rather than an act that brings any genuine benefits, and may well cause considerable harm to the social fabric of our society.

January 2011



 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 4 April 2011