Proposed Legislative Competence Orders relating to Organ Donation and Cycle Paths - Welsh Affairs Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by the British Heart Foundation

SUMMARY

  • There is a shortage of donor organs for transplant across the UK.
  • We believe that a soft opt out system should underpin organ transplantation in Wales, and support the Legislative Competence Order (LCO) to grant the National Assembly for Wales the power to introduce this.
  • This move would help to increase the number of donor organs available for transplant.
  • We believe that the wording of the LCO is appropriate within the context of the Government of Wales Act 2006, and that there are safeguards to ensure there will be no conflict with the European Convention on Human Rights.

1.  Background

1.1  The British Heart Foundation (BHF) is the nation's heart charity. We're fighting to eradicate premature death from heart and circulatory disease, the UK's biggest killer, and provide support and voice for heart patients around the UK.

1.2  The BHF supports measures to improve the UK's rate of organ donation. These measures include consistent national promotion coupled with a strong infrastructure of organ retrieval and professional training. Whilst such measures will go a long way to improving donor organ availability, we believe that a soft opt out system where close relatives retain the power of veto should underpin organ transplantation in Wales, and more broadly the UK as a whole.

1.3  We welcome the opportunity to contribute to the pre-legislative scrutiny of this LCO, which aims to grant the power to the National Assembly for Wales for establishing a soft opt out system for organ donation within Wales. Heart transplants offer the best chance of long term survival for those patients with severe heart failure, and we support the Welsh Assembly Government's attempts to legislate for such a change.

2.  Is the LCO request in the spirit and scope of the devolution settlement?

2.1  The National Assembly for Wales has been leading the UK in considering the benefits that a change to the organ donation system could bring, and following several consultations on the issue has asked for the power to change the system in Wales. They have recognised that there is a shortage of donor organs, and that this is having a detrimental effect on health and wellbeing within Wales for those critically ill patients in desperate need of a transplant.

2.2  We believe that there is strong precedent for introducing this LCO and that the request falls within the spirit and scope of the devolution settlement. This is an Order that aims to introduce an innovative and progressive change within health policy in Wales, and therefore we consider this an appropriate area within which the National Assembly for Wales should be able to legislate.

3.  Is the use of the LCO mechanism in accordance with the Government of Wales Act 2006?

3.1  As highlighted by the Secretary of State for Wales in the foreword to the pre-legislative scrutiny for the proposed Order, LCOs are specifically designed to extend the scope of the powers granted to the National Assembly for Wales within Part 3 of the Government of Wales Act 2006.

3.2  The aim of the LCO is to amend Schedule 5 of the Government of Wales Act 2006, enabling the National Assembly for Wales to legislate in the proposed Matter 9.3, which covers the storage, use and removal of parts of the human body for the purposes of cadaveric organ and tissue donation. Providing the Assembly with this power would enable them to amend the organ donation system within Wales, and to increase the numbers of donor organs as a result. This would bring health benefits to Wales, and we believe the text as worded in the Order is appropriate to be added to Field 9 of Part 1 of Schedule 5 to the 2006 Act, as this clearly relates to health and health services within Wales.

4.  Does the Order relate to Field 9, Part 1 of Schedule 5 and Subject 9, Schedule 7 of the Government of Wales Act 2006?

4.1  We strongly believe that the Order does relate to Field 9, Part 1 of Schedule 5 of the Government of Wales Act 2006, and that the issue of organ transplantation appropriately falls within the area of health and health services. The Order will empower the National Assembly for Wales to be able to introduce a soft opt out system of organ donation for those people living and dying in Wales. This is a health measure in response to a clear health problem, whereby there is a shortage of organs for donation.

4.2  With regards to Subject 9, Schedule 7 of the Government of Wales Act 2006, which concerns areas highlighted as exceptions to the fields of competence where the Assembly cannot legislate, we see no complications with existing exceptions. The only mention of transplantation within Subject 9, Schedule 7 of the Act relates to the issue of xenotransplantation, the transplantation of organs from one species to another. The issue within the Order concerns the transplantation of organs from one human to another, which is not listed as an exception in the Act. Furthermore, the very absence of human transplantation being listed as an exception, and the fact that xenotransplantation is, suggests that the UK Parliament did not wish to exclude all forms of transplantation from the National Assembly's legislative competence.

5.  To what extent is there a demand for legislation on the matter(s) in question?

5.1  We believe there is strong demand for legislation to improve organ donation within Wales. There is a shortage of donor organs for transplantations across all four nations of the UK. These are desperately needed for patients with end-stage failure of organs, including the heart. For critically ill heart failure patients, transplants offer the best chance of long-term survival. In February 2011, the BHF launched a new programme of research called Mending Broken Hearts, which is specifically aimed at developing regenerative medicine treatments to enable the heart to repair its own damage. It will still be some time before treatments such as these are developed, and so heart transplants will remain a crucial life-saving treatment for many patients with severe heart failure. Between April 2009 and March 2010, 120 heart transplant operations were carried out in the UK.[26] 35 of this total were for patients below the age of 16. 126 people were on the active waiting list for a new heart in March 2010—24 died in the previous 12 months before a transplant could be arranged. Due to the shortage of organs and the slim chances of receiving an organ in time, many patients are not even placed on the waiting list for a transplant—the Organ Donation Taskforce has estimated that the actual number in need of a transplant is around double the total on the active waiting list.[27]

5.2  Coupled with the clear shortage of donor organs, the current opt-in system for organ donation does not adequately capture the high levels of public support for organ donation. This remains very high at around 90% in the UK, but the number of people signed up to the Organ Donor Register (ODR) is just 28%. This highlights a need for further measures aimed at improving the number of organ donors. Part of this process involves increasing the promotion of organ donation nationally, while improving the infrastructure of organ retrieval and professional training. We support the recommendations from the Organ Donation Taskforce 2008 review of donation in the UK that aim to address many of these issues. However, we believe that a change to a soft opt out system for organ donation is also essential to make a substantial difference to the availability of donor organs.

5.3  There are international examples where countries have experienced higher donor rates under opt out systems, such as Spain. An American study also analysed the impact of opt out legislation on donor rates by evaluating datasets over a 10-year period, concluding that this legislation has a positive and sizeable effect on organ donation rates.[28] We believe that the UK should adopt such a change, and we are supportive of the Welsh Assembly Government's attempts to introduce this change to organ donation in Wales. Safeguards would be in place to ensure families remain consulted, and such a move would prompt greater family discussion within Wales around organ donation.

5.4  There has been a significant amount of public engagement around the idea of an opt out system for organ donation for Wales. Pre-legislative scrutiny has been in existence for over two years, with the National Assembly considering this issue in October 2008 and consulting on it in May 2009. We have engaged with the Assembly throughout this period, submitting oral evidence to a hearing on the issue conducted by the Assembly's Health, Wellbeing and Local Government Committee. Any move to a soft opt out system would require further engagement with the Welsh public before it could come into effect, and the dialogue with the public over the past two years provides an excellent foundation to build this on. In the event that the Order is successfully passed, we will participate in any further public engagement on the issue.

5.5  Such a change has substantial support within the National Assembly for Wales, in addition to support from a number of organisations including the BHF, the British Medical Association and Royal College of Nursing, in addition to the Chief Medical Officers across the UK.

6.  Are there any cross-border issues relating to the LCO? (eg financial or policy issues)

6.1  A change to the organ donation system within Wales to an opt out system would mean that separate systems for organ donation would operate in Wales compared to the other nations in the UK. Any move to an opt out system specific to Wales would have to be carefully crafted to ensure that it functions effectively as part of the overall UK system.

7.  Are the purpose and scope of the LCO clearly defined, including the terms and definitions used?

7.1  We believe the purpose and scope of the LCO has been clearly defined.

8.  Does the LCO have the potential to increase the regulatory burden on the private or public sector?

8.1  We do not believe that this LCO would increase the regulatory burden on the private or public sector.

9.  Would the proposed LCO necessitate the formation or abolition of Welsh institutions and structures? If so, where does the legislative competence to exercise such changes lie?

9.1  Under a successful opt out system for organ donation in Wales, a form of Opt Out Register would need to be established by the Welsh Assembly Government.

10.  Is the use of an LCO more appropriate than, for example, the use of framework powers in a Westminster Bill to confer competence on the Assembly?

10.1  We believe the use of an LCO is the most appropriate means under the current system for conferring competence on the Assembly.

11.  Has full use been made of any existing powers to issue statutory guidance and/or secondary legislation in relation to this Matter?

11.1  The Order seeks to confer competence on the Assembly for the area of organ donation within Wales. The Assembly has been until now unable to legislate in relation to this Matter.

12.  Does the LCO have the potential to cause confusion regarding legal jurisdiction and the individuals to whom any Measure would apply to?

12.1  As Assembly Measures can only have effect in Wales, the Order only applies to those people who live and die within Wales. The National Assembly will need to develop mechanisms to ensure that it is clear to which individuals an opt out system in Wales will apply.

13.  What are the implications of Article 8 and Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights on any such Measure?

13.1  The Organ Donation Taskforce assessed the legal implications of any potential move to a soft opt out system in the UK in their 2009 report. Their Legal Working Group specifically looked at potential conflicts with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and concluded that a system "based on the presumption of consent or authorisation that allowed adequate provisions for a person to opt out would be compatible with the ECHR".[29] The Group suggested measures that should be included to aid compliance with the ECHR. This included ensuring relatives were still consulted and providing consideration for some particular groups, such as children and those that may lack the mental capacity to make a decision on whether to opt out. The Welsh Assembly Government has made it clear that these safeguards would be included under a soft opt out system for organ donation in Wales, and we believe that the Order reflects this.

February 2011



26   NHS Blood and Transplant (2010) Transplant Activity in the UK 2009-10 Back

27   Organ Donation Taskforce (2008) Organs for Transplant: the Supplement Report Back

28   Abadie, A and Gay, S (2006): The Impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study. In: Journal of Health Economics, 25 (4), 599-620 Back

29  Organ Donation Taskforce, The potential impact of an opt out system for organ donation in the UK (2009), Annex C (Legal Working Group Report) Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 4 April 2011