Youth Unemployment sand the Future Jobs Fund - Work and Pensions Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Action for Children

Over the past year Action for children has successfully recruited 140[36] young people under the FJF initiative (many of whom would never previously have considered applying for a job with us). Many of these young people have been languishing in the derogatory not education, employment or training (NEET[37]) categorisation but now realise that they are able to make a valuable contribution to the workforce.

1.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • The Government has an obligation to provide appropriate opportunities and support for all young people especially the most vulnerable[38] and those who are most disengaged from education, employment and training.
  • The most vulnerable young people across the UK need extra support so that they are equipped to take advantage of any future opportunities. More must also be done to raise their aspirations to succeed in life and to prevent intergenerational worklessness[39].
  • The Government's new Work Programme due to be launched in 2011 must be accessible to vulnerable young people, be flexible enough to meet their needs, learn lessons from the FJF and build on its successes.

2.  ACTION FOR CHILDREN[40]

2.1   Action for Children is committed to seeing all young people fulfil their potential; this is not just about attaining certain grades at school but setting and achieving their ambitions.

2.2   Our services:

  • Support young people to stay in or enter education, employment or training.
  • Work with young people who are disabled[41], homeless, leaving care, have caring responsibilities, and who are at risk of, or who have, offended.
  • Help young people to become independent.
  • Enable young people to become active citizens in their own communities.

2.4   In all of our work with children and young people we seek to open up opportunities, overcome barriers and build resilience - employability is a key aspect of this approach. Our services take a holistic approach addressing wider problems such as participation in education, employment and training. We do this by meeting the needs of a young person based not just upon their age but on the stage that they are at in their development.[42]

3.   ACTION FOR CHILDREN AND THE FUTURE JOBS FUND (FJF)

3.1   Action for Children recruited 140 young people under the FJF initiative, 69 are non operational staff (admin based roles) and 71 operational staff (early years and youth support roles).

3.2   We created posts in youth support, business support and early years support. We worked hard to identify these real roles and were acutely conscious of potential safeguarding issues and risks due to the vulnerability of many of our service users. We did not allow for safeguarding and child protection issues to be compromised at any point, but nevertheless have been able to place young people in real work situations allowing them get the best experience and a real insight into the work we do. Our employees under the FJF are real members of the Action for Children team. We value the young people we employ and have never treated the FJF as an initiative for voluntary work or work experience.

3.3  Our internal evaluation of the FJF will be based on feedback from employees and line managers. We aim to complete this evaluation in January 2011. It will look at:

  • The distance travelled by employees in terms of skill base and personal development i.e. confidence/self esteem.
  • The ways we can improve internal procedures regarding recruitment and ongoing support, helping us to shape future services and programmes.

4.   THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE FJF HAS SUCCEEDED IN MATCHING NEW WORK EXPERIENCE OPPORTUNITIES TO YOUNG UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE

4.1   We would like to stress that our experience as an employer under the FJF initiative has been extremely positive. We have successfully matched 140 young people to real roles within our organisation and those young people have become valuable members of our workforce.

4.2   We have matched young people to the following posts and roles:

  • Business support /administration function. This role is vital to our services as it is the first point of contact for people visiting or telephoning a project/office. These employees engage with community users, enquirers, established partners and other key stakeholders.
  • Youth Support Workers have direct contact with their community. In this role they support individuals, groups and in some instances families in activities such as mentoring, coaching, outreach, residential, trips and outings. All of which involve face-to-face communication with children, young people and their families.
  • Early Years Support Workers This role provides FJF employees with the opportunity to have direct contact in some of our services with pre-school children, young children, their parent/carers, frequently with social workers and other professionals. This can be through working in crèches, play sessions, food preparation, parenting, pre-school and after school sessions.

4.4  The young people employed as part of the FJF have a full employment plan. This includes: a comprehensive induction process which is tailored to the role they will be undertaking; a key one-to-one session detailing objectives and training plan with their line manager; and a mentor based at the project they are working who will provide additional support throughout their six month placement. The focus of the training and support is on participants strengths and areas for development. As part of their induction, new staff complete training courses; intranet based learning and shadow existing workers. Examples include:

  • City and Guilds Level one certificate in employability and Personal Development.
  • Action for Children core training (Introduction to Action for Children - welcome day, diversity and inclusion, safeguarding).
  • Digital Literacy Curriculum and Microsoft Office Essentials (both part of the Britain Works campaign through Microsoft).
  • Internal training within projects such as introductions to internal IT systems/ health and safety etc.
  • In addition, we have provided a small fund for external training for example in Newcastle one of our business support officers is undertaking an IT qualification at the local college which we are funding.

This training will provide our FJF employees with a legacy of transferable skills that will serve them in their future employment choices.

5.   STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE FJF PROGRAMME

Strengths

5.1  Helping employees on the FJF become more employable

For many young people their FJF placement is their first experience of real work. Their new roles support them to develop; to take responsibility for themselves (i.e. getting to work on time); to take responsibility in their workplace and to develop communication skills and appropriate work place behaviour. Many of the skills the young people have developed can be defined as "soft skills", i.e. confidence and self esteem, qualities that are difficult to measure but are critical for employability. Measuring these elements is a part of our internal evaluation.

We have many examples of how the FJF employees are developing skills such as using their initiative and creativity along with interpersonal skills. This foundation of real work experience for FJF employees means that when they do seek further employment they will be in a more advantageous position. After their FJF employment we believe these young people will have moved closer to the labour market and to securing employment due to receiving the right "on the job experience", training and emotional support.

Experience of the FJF - employee

"The Future Jobs Fund initiative has provided me with employment that seemed unavailable because I lacked the hands on experience most jobs look for. This initiative has substantially benefited my career and I would recommend the Future Jobs Fund path into employment to anyone".

5.2  Supporting FJF employees with additional needs

As a FJF employer we have been able to offer a holistic package of support, which has meant young people working with us are unlikely to leave their placement. We understand that young people who have been unemployed for an extended period often have additional needs such as: apprehension and uncertainty towards the work place, finding it difficult to integrate into the working environment, motivational issues and/or low skills. As our services are community based and highly experienced in welcoming and engaging the most socially excluded young people, our staff have used their experience to nurture the young people to feel confident in the work place alongside developing their skills.

The young people we have employed through the FJF come from a diverse range of backgrounds and circumstances with a variety of needs. All our line managers have the flexibility to put in extra support for an individual and specifically tailor it to the individuals identified needs such as another member of staff mentoring the employee to integrate into the workplace. The dedicated resource we assign to manage this role (the FJF coordinator) ensures the direct line managers have additional support.

Due to our experience and expertise with working with hard to reach young people we have been able to demonstrate our flexibility when faced with challenges to retaining an employee. The importance of this approach is further supported by our charitable objectives.

Case study - Preventing a FJF placement from breaking down

A young man working in our fundraising team has been displaying aspects of autistic behaviour I.e. difficulty in remembering instructions, poor communication skills and a lack of interpersonal skills.

These behaviours were not disclosed during the recruitment process which led to problems during his first month of employment. The staff team took time out of their own schedules to repeat instructions and guide this young man. After discussions in supervision and with the FJF coordinator, the line manager was able to identify key areas of the employee's progress that were proving successful in particular his attention to detail and his IT skills.

After a small adjustment to his working duties the employee is now making good progress and the staff team is now working together productively. Taking the time out to focus on what this young man could do instead of what he couldn't made all the difference to him still being in employment today.

5.3   Keeping young people off benefits after FJF placements

Whilst it is still very early days for the majority of the young people on the programme with us, we will have a small number of leavers in September and October and we are confident that after their time with us they will be better equipped to apply for jobs in the future.

Within our organisation we have been able to offer further employment opportunities to some of the young people who have been successfully involved with the FJF initiative (for example a permanent Business Support Officer level 2 post was filled in one of our services in the Wirral and Youth Support Worker in Millom). Many managers working with FJF employees are looking at the option of keeping staff on permanently when their contract is completed. Without the FJF it would have been unlikely that these young people would have even applied for these posts; they are now a great addition to our workforce. In addition, a number of FJF employees have been given additional working hours due to the level of their performance so far. Furthermore,

5.4   FJF employees positively impacting the Action for Children work force

Reports from our managers about their involvement with the FJF employees have been extremely positive. We have run internal FJF Employee Coaching Sessions[43] for all those who are supervising an FJF employee. This covered the portfolio qualification which looks at putting together evidence of competencies gained from the time on the initiative and also at ways of making the time the most positive and productive for the young person i.e. motivational techniques.

We have found that the FJF employees have both complimented and enhanced our existing staff teams, with young people teaching our staff a great deal. For example, a number of employees are extremely proficient with their IT skills and have come into our workplace and set up new admin systems and recording procedures.

Furthermore, one of the by-products from the FJF programme is that it supports development opportunities for our own permanent staff within Action for Children. There are a high number of project/office managers across our organisation that have delegated the mentoring to staff team members in order to build their own skill base by supervising a FJF employee.

Experience of the FJF - Line manager

"I am finding the Future Jobs Fund employment opportunity a positive experience, Melissa is a very capable and willing employee, she has worked on specific jobs and covers general office tasks when required. As a new line manager, the experience for me to work with Melissa from the recruitment stage, and throughout her employment has been very rewarding."

Weaknesses

5.5   Job Centre Plus (JCP) procedures presenting barriers to young people

We had very little time to establish our new working relationships with JCP offices and leads at the beginning of the FJF initiative. We identified in the early stage a number of barriers preventing those more vulnerable young people from applying for roles with us. These included JCP advisors being unclear of the FJF process, advisors not promoting the roles, and the application process being a "hurdle to high" for some young people as they were not given the adequate time or support to fill in an application form.

To counter some of these issues, Action for Children adjusted several of its existing recruitment procedures in order to successfully recruit the 140 young people - for example reducing by half the length of our job application forms. In some cases we did remove our application form altogether by using the JCP generic application form. We also held open days in three of our projects where potential candidates could come for interviews.

Nevertheless, these factors along with the existing stigma, which inhibits young people from even entering JCP offices, was a significant reason behind why we have found it difficult to recruit vulnerable young people.

5.6  Post Employment Support

As part of the contractual agreements under FJF, JCP advisors are supposed to re-engage the FJF employees at months 4 and 5 to help to support them to secure permanent work. This has not consistently been taking place. We believe that if our experience is shared across other organisations, this will impact on the number of leavers who may return to claim government benefits. Furthermore, we are concerned there will be a large demand on this service closer to the end of the year when many of the FJF placements complete. In Action for Children 95% of our FJF employees finish in December.

5.7   Training not being an essential requirement

With the training element being central to the positions we have offered and knowing the positive impact this has made, we feel that this crucial element should have been a requirement for the initiative not optional.

6.  THE LIKELY IMPACT OF THE DECISION TO END THE FJF IN MARCH 2011 RATHER THAN MARCH 2012

6.1  We believe that the likely impact of the decision to end the FJF in March 2011 rather than March 2012 will be to exacerbate the current situation for many vulnerable young people who are unable to access employment opportunities. The programme itself was a "ray of hope" for many young people who felt there was really no way out of their unemployed status. It gives young people without the connections to certain professions or employers a "helping hand" or a route through the "back door" into employment opportunities that would not normally be open to them without such state intervention.

6.2  The most vulnerable young people need extra support during this recession so that they are best equipped to take advantage of any future opportunities. The opportunities they thought would be available to them at the time they entered the job market are now not there. We are concerned that as youth unemployment rises (on current trends), any opportunities will be snapped up by those better connected and more academically successful young people - further increasing the divide.

6.3  For the most vulnerable and excluded the impact of the recession will not just be felt now - but may persist across generations. Some families trapped by previous recessions are still feeling the impact today and the current recession appears likely to widen this gap still further. The repercussions both for individuals and for our society in terms of wasted aspirations and lost opportunities will resonate for years.

6.4  We acknowledge that the situation for many young people who are leaving further education or university is bleak. It is right for Government to support these young people. However, we are very concerned that within all this activity the needs of the most vulnerable young people, those who do not see employment as a right or an aspiration[44], will become lost as the impact of the recession plays out across the whole labour market.

6.5  More immediately, with the decision to end the FJF in March 2011, many young people who are currently unemployed and have been without work for nearly 6 months, who would have been eligible for the programme in the coming weeks will have had their expectations raised and dashed. Their only hope for employment has been taken away. The gap between the end of the FJF and the start of the new Work Programme in the summer of 2011 will mean a substantial cohort of young people with languish for months without real employment opportunities and will become further removed from the labour market.

7.  HOW THE TRANSITION FROM FJF TO THE WORK PROGRAMME WILL BE MANAGED, INCLUDING THE PART TO BE PLAYED BY THE GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSAL TO FUND NEW APPRENTICESHIPS.

7.1  We are pleased that the Government is seeking new ways to support unemployed young people through the New Work Programme and apprenticeships. This should present a real chance to ensure that opportunities are available for all young people, and in particular for those with additional needs, who are vulnerable and likely to be out of work for the longest period of time. We are pleased that under the New Work Programme providers will be paid predominantly for sustained job outcomes with higher payments for the hardest to help[45]. We would like to ensure that the Government includes those young people who we believe are the "hardest to help" such as care leavers, young carers, young offender, lone parents, incapacity claimants and disabled young people.

7.2  It must be noted however that the reduction in employment opportunities during a recession and the concurrent increased risk attached to business investment in "on the job" training means that we need to identify the "best" initiatives to address the issue and to do this urgently.

7.3  The most vulnerable young people need extra support during this economic downturn so that they are equipped to take advantage of future opportunities. We are therefore pleased that the Government is proposing funding new apprenticeships and with this in mind we would like to highlight Youth Build (example below), a supported apprenticeship service. This service is not seen much outside the third sector and we believe that this is an ideal way of supporting vulnerable young people into training and employment.

Action for Children Service - Youth Build

Action for Children plays a key role in providing supported apprenticeships through programmes designed to increase work experience and provide accreditation on key skills.

Action for Children Scotland's innovative Youthbuild model offers training and employment opportunities in the construction industry for vulnerable young people. Scotland has one of the highest rates in Europe of unemployment among young people.

An independent evaluation of the Youthbuild programme (2007) highlighted the successes of the Youthbuild programme. These findings include:

  • Up to 80 per cent success rate across the three projects for helping young people move into employment following their involvement in the programme;
  • high completion rates for the programme, with 32 of the 43 young people who entered the programme completing and moving into either construction or some other form of employment;
  • considerable savings of working with this cohort - for example, the annual cost for a male in a youth offenders' institution is estimated at £47,000

A three year longitudinal study of this work has been commissioned with the first year report due out at the end of September; the emerging findings from this work show that:

  • The major strength of Youthbuild is the offer of paid employment once the six week training has been completed, which attracts young people, keeps them engaged, and provides hope for the future, which raises their aspirations.
  • Its balance of practical skills training, Personal Social Development and supported employment has proved a successful formula.
  • The approach is not only helping young people to gain employment related skills, but it is having significant positive impacts on young people's relationships, income, and risk management. In particular a number of young people are reporting that they are keeping out of trouble with the police because they know they now have something to lose.

16 September 2010



36   We did have a grant award to deliver 200 vacancies; our contract like others had a time-order-variation option which meant we could recruit past our end date on the 30 June. However, under the new Government rules this option was removed- meaning that out final figures are below the original bid. We were confident that we would have recruited the full amount by August 2010. This would have included posts in our head office and in one of our schools. Back

37   For the purpose of this submission we will not use the acronym "NEET" as young people have told us that they find it stigmatising. We will therefore not abbreviate. Back

38   We understand vulnerable young people to be, care leavers, young carers, young offenders, disabled young people. Young people with mental health and behavioural problems, those who have large gaps in their education, due to poor attendance and leaving school early, negative relationships within their families and with peers and coming from families where they may be the third generation to be unemployed, reliant on benefits, having few or no role models or support. Back

39   About 1.9million children now live in workless homes, the Office for National Statistics, September 2010.  Back

40   Action for Children works with 156,000 children, young people and their families at around 420 UK projects. For 140 years, it has been supporting some of the most vulnerable people in the country, helping them transform their lives and realise their potential. We provide a range of high-quality, flexible and innovative services that meet the complex and diverse needs of children and young people across the UK. Back

41   Young people with learning difficulties and disabilities are twice as likely to be NEET as those without - DCSF, Reducing the proportion of 16-18 year olds NEET: The Strategy, 2009.  Back

42   Centre for Social Justice and LGA (2009) hidden talents II supports this argument and states that "there is mounting evidence that young people continue to mature for longer than was originally thought… and that people's passage into adulthood is likely to be more prolonged and unpredictable". Back

43   Approximately 80 out of possible 85 supervisors of FJF employees across England, Wales and Scotland attended the sessions. Back

44   Action for Children through our range of services works with those young people who will be hardest hit by this economic downturn. For example, in interviews with young women using our care leavers' services pre and post recession, their answers about the impact of the recession were ambiguous. While very worried about not being able to find a job or make ends meet, these young women did not see the recession itself as the problem - the problems they were facing were too deeply engrained and persistent. Back

45   Helping people back into work, DWP
http://dwp.gov.uk/about-dwp/customer-delivery/jobcentre-plus/stakeholders-and-partnerships/keeping-in-touch/in-touch-july-2010/ 
Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 21 December 2010