Rebalancing the Economy: Trade and Investment - Business, Innovation and Skills Committee Contents


Written evidence from UK Music

ABOUT UK MUSIC

UK Music is the umbrella organisation which represents the collective interests of the UK's commercial music industry - from artists, musicians, studio producers, songwriters and composers, to record labels, music managers, music publishers, music licensing organisations and collective licensing companies.

UK Music consists of:

  • Association of Independent Music representing 850 small and medium sized independent music companies;
  • British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors with over 2,200 songwriter and composer members;
  • BPI representing over 440 record company members;
  • Music Managers Forum representing 425 managers throughout the music industry;
  • Music Producers Guild representing and promoting the interests of all those involved in the production of recorded music - including producers, engineers, mixers, re-mixers, programmers and mastering engineers;
  • Music Publishers Association, with more than 250 major and independent music publishers representing close to 4,000 catalogues;
  • Musicians Union representing 32,000 musicians;
  • PPL representing 46,000 performer members and 5,750 record company members;
  • PRS for Music representing 73,000 songwriters, composers and music publishers.

INTRODUCTION

1.  As a nation, the UK is the second largest producer of music repertoire in the world and one of only three countries that can claim to be net exporters of music. Last year approximately one in every ten albums sold in North America and Canada was made by a British artist. Earlier this year UK Music published our vision of the future, an industrial manifesto for growth, "Liberating Creativity". It unveils our single ambition for the next decade: to challenge the United States as the largest music-producing nation in the world. We know that there is a desire for high-quality, well-produced, musical content; it is this demand, which will be core to our ability to deliver on our growth potential.

2.  Exports in the music sector take a variety of forms. We have a long history of exporting music on physical formats such as CD. Other types of international income that music generates include online and mobile music sales; licensing of music rights to international broadcasters; licensing of music rights to international partners for distribution; licensing of music rights to film, televison and games - particularly in the USA; touring and live performance; and professional services (eg music production, recording services). Particular strengths in recent years have been collective international music rights licensing, licensing to film, tv and games, and live music (through both touring and the tourists that it attracts). For example Visit Britain suggest that music is the second most popular reason that tourists choose Britain, after our museums.

3.  The ratio of international to domestic income will vary depending on the product and the partnerships of the company selling or licensing it. In the case of recorded music, international income can be a substantial slice. Where the product and trading partners are exceptionally strong, it can be over 50% of the income generated.

4.  The music sector has a culture of international trade. For example, a survey conducted by the Association of Independent Music showed that a very high proportion were exporting, with 65% in the EU, 62% in the USA and 36% in Japan. The majority of the companies surveyed are micro-businesses, and the figure is high when compared with other small businesses. For example under a quarter of Federation of Small Business members export.

5.  However accessing the finance and market access to fully exploit international opportunities is a problem. Companies who have been able to establish a base have been very successful. British record company and music publisher Beggars Group have established a 35 person office in the USA, which has allowed them to achieve great success in the American market.

THE GOVERNMENT TRADE WHITE PAPER

6.  UK Music did not make a submission to the Government's Trade White Paper, and refers the committee to the submissions by our members PRS for Music and the BPI.

7.  We highlight the calls of the collection society PRS for Music for "an appropriate legal and operational infrastructure which supports the licensing of music rights [internationally], and to ensure that there is value for IP in those markets". They forecast that there is significant potential international revenue growth for their members, which could be boosted by Government placing IP prominently in the UK's trade negotiations and reducing barriers to trade.

8.  We also highlight the BPI's comments from the perspective of recording companies that it can be challenging in both emerging and established music markets to realise the value of their exports where there is widespread unlicensed use of British music, and where their rights are not always recognised or respected.

The role of UKTI with regard to identifying opportunities in established markets, emerging markets, key sectors and working with businesses both large and small to take advantage of these opportunities

9.  UK Music recognises the vital role provided by the specialist team at UK Trade & Investment. Through the Music Export Group, and close relationships with employers and trade associations, UKTI have developed a strategy that works well for our industry. UKTI prioritise the USA, Japan, France and Germany as the essential established markets for music. They have also been instrumental in offering intelligence on our sector to the international trade teams around the UK and within the commercial divisions in key embassies. We would hope that with the abolition of the Regional Development Agencies, and introduction of Local Economic Partnerships, that these effective support systems for businesses that want to trade internationally are maintained.

10.  UK Music recognises that there is a strategy to prioritise emerging markets and large infrastructure projects or major contracts. However this will not deliver export growth in our sector. Our industry, which is made up of mainly micro and small businesses, has asked that in a climate of limited resources that UKTI focus on established markets where firms can guarantee returns. In emerging markets, we would urge Government to support the development of strong IP frameworks. This will provide the base from which music exports can subsequently develop.

11.  UKTI and the Music Industry have worked together effectively to maximise the value of their investment. They have created a collective "British Music @" brand which has been used to promote British Music at trade fairs, used the collective buying power of the industry to drive down trade fair costs, and run pre-exporting workshops at no cost to ensure that firms accessing support are market-ready.

12.  UK Music suggests that Government benchmark its support for creative industries with those of other nations. For example, that France have a French Music Export Bureau with a staff of 22 including offices in Paris, Tokyo, New York, London, Berlin and Sao Paulo. The US has IP attachés in key territories to champion their IP based industries.

The effectiveness of the Export Credit Guarantee Department and the flow of trade credit

13.  UK Music members have made little use of the Export Credit Guarantee Scheme, due to our industry structure.

How other countries, similar to the UK, export to emerging markets and what our Government could learn, if anything, from them.

14.  UK Music refers the committee to the work done by the EU and USA to champion IP frameworks internationally, as detailed in the written evidence provided by PRS for Music and the BPI.

The role of the British Business Ambassadors

15.  UK Music members have had little experience of the British Business Ambassadors. However we are interested in the Publisher's Association proposal that IP attachés be used to champion and co-ordinate support for British IP internationally.

3 February 2011



 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 11 July 2011