Rebalancing the Economy: Trade and Investment - Business, Innovation and Skills Committee Contents


Written evidence from The International Chamber of Commerce UK ("ICC UK")

ICC UK COMMENTS ON UKTI STRATEGY "BRITAIN OPEN FOR BUSINESS"

Overview

1.  The International Chamber of Commerce UK ("ICC UK") supports the Government's recent efforts to realise fully the contribution that UKTI can make to improving UK export performance and driving inward investment.

2.  Whilst we welcome the core elements of the "Britain Open for Business" strategy, we think that more detail is required about how the proposals will work in practice—and specifically what needs to change to deliver a better service. In this connection, it is our view that careful consideration needs to be given to how the various strands of the strategy can best be implemented to provide real "value-added" for UK businesses.

3.  In this context, a number of recommendations are set out below with specific reference to individual elements of UKTI's revised strategy. Our core messages can be summarised as follows:

  • (a)  it is not immediately clear how some of the services will be rolled out and how they will be priced (eg bespoke services for high value deals). This makes an analysis of likely take-up and impact difficult;
  • (b)  the OMIS is a valuable resource for businesses but delivery is patchy. Government needs to identify areas of weakness and ensure a high-quality service for all markets. This should be a real priority;
  • (c)  UKTI needs to ensure that the skills and knowledge of its staff are sufficiently high to deliver existing and planned services. Previous commercial experience and high quality staff training are essential in this regard;
  • (d)  UKTI needs to look carefully at how it can better raise awareness of its services. Partnering with business associations can play a key role in this regard;
  • (e)  the strategy has too narrow a conception of "commercial diplomacy". Government needs to look at using its overseas network to address a wider range of issue which affect companies when operating internationally (eg non-tariff barriers); and
  • (f)  the strategy to boost inward investment is to be commended, but domestic policies need to be improved to encourage multinational firms to invest in the UK (CFCs, top rate of income tax). UKTI should look to feed in recommendations to Whitehall about policies that deter (or by contrast encourage) investment.

FREE BUSINESS MENTORING

4.  It is certainly good to see Government looking at innovative ways to help SMEs start trading internationally—including through the provision of free business mentoring for first time exporters.

5.  Delivery and coverage. We are, however, unclear as to how the new "Catalyst UK" network will work to deliver this mentoring service. Three questions arise in particular: one, will this network of circa 100 business ambassadors be able to provide sufficient market coverage? Two, is the aim to target a small number of SMEs, rather than having an "open door" policy for companies which are thinking about getting into international markets? Three, how will this service fit/complement support currently provided (free-of-charge) by UKTI's International Trade Advisors?

6.  Awareness. UKTI will need to think carefully about how it can ensure that SMEs are made aware of this service. In this connection we think that there is scope to work more effectively with key business organisations, trade press and other multipliers, eg freight forwarders.

OVERSEAS MARKET INTRODUCTION SERVICE (OMIS)

7.  Quality of product. Many SMEs tell us that the OMIS is at best very patchy. A common complaint is that reports from some posts do not offer substantially more intelligence on overseas markets than a simple internet search. Government needs to think carefully about how to raise standards across the network in order to enhance the support given to UK exporters.

8.  Content of OMIS reports. From an SME perspective, we think that the OMIS should provide companies with:

  • (a)  a quick and accurate snapshot of the prospects for their exports so that a company can decide whether to explore the market seriously;
  • (b)  first-hand knowledge of potential partners (eg distributors) whom overseas posts should speak to in preparing a list of potential partners;
  • (c)  insight on the subtle differences between markets which look superficially alike; and
  • (d)  hidden pitfalls (tariffs are easy to get information on, but companies also need to know about relevant non-tariff barriers (eg environmental standards)).

9.  Cost vs quality. Whilst some companies complain about the cost of OMIS reports, we think this would be less of an issue if the quality of reports were higher across the board. The OMIS needs to be positioned as a premium service, but to do so the consistency of the product needs to be improved.

10.  Need for benchmarking of delivery. We think there would be merit in conducting an assessment of OMIS reports currently provided by posts with a view to benchmarking best practice. Industry bodies (such as ICC) may be able to assist with such an exercise.

11.  Global service. The proposal to develop a "Global OMIS" should be an attractive proposition for firms operating in multiple markets; however, this should not be seen to obviate the need for an upgrading of the service provided by some posts. Indeed, if companies are paying for a global service they should be entitled to expect a consistently high-quality product across all markets.

BESPOKE SERVICE

12.  The planned introduction of a bespoke service to support companies to win major trade contracts is to be welcomed, and represents a useful extension of the existing UKTI services.

13.  Need for greater clarity. However, in order to comment in more detail, it would be helpful to receive further information on: (i) the type of contracts for which UKTI envisages providing this service; (ii) the kinds of support UKTI will provide under the bespoke programme.

14.  Pricing. As a general comment, we welcome the plan to introduce performance related fees for bespoke services. We acknowledge that "success fees" could provide a useful performance incentive for UKTI, but would welcome greater clarity about how these will be calculated. We would also note that the service should be priced in such a way to make it an attractive proposition for mid-market firms in particular.

EXPERTISE

15.  The strategy rightly notes that UKTI needs to ensure that it has the right in-house expertise and skills. Indeed, is our view that is the single most important element of the new strategy—particularly given that some of the planned services (eg bespoke support) will require real expertise in a range of markets and sectors.

16.  Developing contacts is also critical. For example in providing lists of potential partners, as referred to in paragraph 7b above, it is not enough to list a few candidate partners. Rather, staff need to get under the skin of potential partners to understand how the chemistry would work—eg what makes a really good partner for product x? Management within UKTI need to encourage a more proactive approach to developing contacts with overseas industry to help with this.

17.  Notwithstanding budgetary constraints, we think that better training is absolutely key. Previous commercial expertise should also be a pre-requisite for front line posts—ultimately businesses want to be advised by people who have "walked the walk" before them!

INVESTMENT PROMOTION

18.  The strategy to boost inward investment is to be commended, but "talking up" Britain abroad needs to be backed by domestic policies that help reposition the UK as a centre for international business.

19.  We understand that the UK's tax regime—and in particular the framework for taxing companies overseas profits—remains a deterrent for many multinational firms. The Government needs to ensure that planned reforms in this area make the UK a more attractive place to locate international operations. Moreover, the personal tax burden for senior executives remains an issue that needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency.

20.  We think that UKTI should look to feed in recommendations to Whitehall departments about policies that deter investment based on discussions with overseas firms. This should help provide a sound evidence base for domestic policies aimed at enhancing the competitive position of the UK.

GOVERNMENT/GOVERNMENT CONTACTS

21.  Wider conception of trade diplomacy needed. We believe that there is a real opportunity to create openings for UK businesses operating (or looking to operate) internationally through government to government contacts. But to do so, we think that UKTI's work must embrace trade diplomacy in the widest sense. This means going further than simply trying to help strike deals with overseas authorities. Instead, the focus should be on how UKTI and the FCO contribute to all barriers facing UK firms in overseas markets.

22.  NTBs are a major problem. Non Tariff Barriers (or technical barriers) to trade are currently one of the biggest current problems facing UK business operating in overseas markets. A number of markets use local regulatory approvals processes—such as requirements for environmental standards certification—to impede the free flow of foreign goods and services.

23.  Need for a professional and pro-active response. UKTI and the FCO need to be properly equipped to respond to these problems. This means placing staff with specialist expertise (eg IP, tax) in overseas posts with a view to engaging with local officials where problems arise. Posts need to be alert to the impact regulations could have on international trade. Ideally they need to be ahead of the curve so that there is a chance of diplomatic intervention before a new regulation is adopted. ICC UK would be happy to work with the FCO/UKTI in developing key indicators in this area.

24.  We would like to see UKTI positioned as the primary point of call in cases where companies face barriers doing business in overseas markets. Currently many companies do not know who they should speak to when issues arise, and likewise how Government can help. This could be remedied by having a proper system in place to allow companies to lodge their concerns with officials in local markets.

10 June 2011



 
previous page contents


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 11 July 2011