Government reform of Higher Education - Business, Innovation and Skills Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by the Sutton Trust

INTRODUCTION

The Sutton Trust is an independent charity, founded and chaired by Sir Peter Lampl, that aims to improve social mobility and address educational disadvantage. Since 1997 the Trust has funded over 100 research studies, and has profoundly influenced the national agenda on social mobility and education. The Trust has spent over £35 million on a wide range of projects to improve opportunities for non-privileged children, from the early years, through primary and secondary schooling and access to higher education and the professions.

These initiatives have been thoroughly evaluated and those that have been shown to be cost effective, for example the Trust's university summer schools, have been taken up by others, notably Government. In April 2011 the Government awarded £125 million to the Sutton Trust as the lead charity supported by the Impetus Trust to establish a new major programme to boost the attainment of poor children in underperforming schools.

In this short briefing we summarise the main evidence and policy issues that relate to access and widening participation in higher education, and the Trust's access work, focusing in particular on access of non-privileged pupils to leading research universities.

Social mobility and access to elite universities

Over and above access to higher education more generally, entry to selective universities matters because the graduates of these institutions go on to dominate the most sought-after and influential careers and, in general, earn significantly more over their lifetimes. Social mobility at the top is an important barometer of equality of opportunity in wider society.

The following table, based on Sutton Trust studies, shows the continuing dominance of the privately educated across a range of professions.

The proportion of non-privileged students at the UK's most academically selective universities remains depressingly low. While there may have been progress in widening access to higher education more broadly, Government Performance Indicators in 2002-03, for example, showed that one in five young degree entrants to Russell Group institutions were from the four lower class groups, and one in two of the wider population. These proportions were essentially unchanged in 2007-08.

Our research also shows that entrants to selective universities come from a relatively small number of schools and colleges. There are approximately 3,500 providers of post-16 education in the UK, but in the period 2002 to 2006, just 200 schools accounted for nearly 30% of admissions to the 13 elite Sutton Trust universities, and 48% of entry to Oxbridge.

Earlier educational gaps

While the focus of this briefing is on access to higher education specifically, these admission trends are driven largely by earlier gaps in attainment, as the graph below shows for one "cohort" of pupils who undertook GCSEs in 2005/06 and entered university in 2007-08. Independent school pupils are over 22 times more likely to enter a highly selective university than state school children entitled to Free School Meals, and 55 times more likely than FSM pupils to gain a place at Oxford or Cambridge.

The Trust has compiled evidence on the drivers of these earlier education gaps, finding for example:

Advice and guidance regarding higher education is too often poor and ill-timed at school—at least half is judged by young people to be inadequate, not objective or unrealistic.

Almost half of state school teachers said they would not encourage their brightest students to apply to Oxbridge, while three fifths thought less that 30% of the entry to Oxbridge was from state schools (when it stood at 54%).

University admissions

Even when armed with the right A-level grades, students from non-privileged backgrounds are less likely to apply to the most selective universities. Sutton Trust research has found:

High achieving independent school pupils on average make twice as many applications to leading research universities than similarly high achieving pupils from comprehensive schools.

If pupils in the state sector in England had the same participation rates as pupils from independent schools with similar "academic" A level results, over 4,500 extra students could enter the 500 courses with the highest average entry qualifications by age 19.

University degree results

At the same time, students from comprehensive schools are likely to achieve higher class degrees at university than independent and grammar school students with similar A-levels and GCSE results, a study commissioned by the Sutton Trust and the Government showed

A comprehensive school student with A-level grades BBB for example is likely to perform as well in their university degree as an independent or grammar school student with A-level grades ABB or AAB—ie one to two grades higher. Comprehensive school pupils also performed better than their similarly qualified independent and grammar school counterparts in degrees from the most academically selective universities and across all degree classes, awarded to graduates in 2009.

Student finances

The Trust has a number of major concerns about the Government's decision to allow universities in England to charge fees of up to £9,000 a year from 2012.

A recent poll commissioned by the Sutton Trust found that less then half of school pupils said they would apply to university if fees rose to £7,000 a year.

Only 45% of the pupils aged 11-16 at schools in England and Wales said they would be likely to continue to university if fees were raised to £7,000 - and this percentage falls to 26% with a major hike up to £10,000.

Graduate debt in England is set to reach the highest levels in the world. According to a national survey by the Project on Student Debt charity, US students graduating in 2009 from four year bachelor programmes in public and private colleges left with an average of $24,000 (£15,000) in student loan debt. The College Board meanwhile has estimated similar levels of debt: in 2007-08 for graduates at state colleges it was $17,700 (£11,000); while at private institutions, it was $22,400 (£14,000).

Depending on the assumptions made, taking into account for example maintenance grants to the poorest students, graduate debts are likely to range between £40,000 and £50,000 for a three year programme. In other words, English graduates will face two to three times the debt of graduates in the US.

The Trust is at present undertaking a research study on the likely impact of fees over the lifetimes of graduates.

Trust project work

Given the rise in fees, the Trust believes that university outreach work will need to be bolstered in coming years. The Trust currently supports the following schemes:

Summer schools

During the last 12 years, over 10,000 students have attended one week Sutton Trust summer schools at Bristol, Cambridge, Nottingham, Oxford and St. Andrews' Universities. Students attending these one-week tasters of university life are considerably more likely to apply to, and to take up undergraduate places, at one of the host universities compared with similar students.

Pathways to Law

The Pathways to Law programme—a £1.5 million initiative developed by the Sutton Trust and the College of Law, with support from major law firms, inspires and supports academically-able students from non-privileged backgrounds interested in a career in law. The scheme is delivered by five universities—Leeds, London School of Economics, Manchester, Southampton and Warwick.

Reach for Excellence

The Reach for Excellence (RfE) programme at Leeds University is an extended outreach scheme that provides support for a group of local highly-able 16 year olds from disadvantaged backgrounds with the aim of raising their chances of enrolling at a research intensive university.

Academic Enrichment Programme

The Academic Enrichment Programme, which runs at Manchester, Birmingham and Nottingham Universities, is a year-long programme offering Year 12 the opportunity to explore the university experience in depth. It aims to develop the skills that will lead to success at A-level and beyond and also provides on-going guidance and support.

STEP Easter scheme at Cambridge

An example of a highly focussed programme, this scheme targets state school pupils who already have a conditional offer from Cambridge in maths.

Sutton Trust Academic Routes (STAR) programme at Exeter and Leeds

The scheme—which is a modification of a US% scheme, attached to a comprehensive access programme—aims to support a number of academically able students from local schools serving disadvantaged areas on a clear pathway to a research-led university. These are the first access schemes in the UK to be evaluated using a randomised control trial.

Policy areas

Apart from more outreach work, the Trust also believes a number of policies could help university access:

Universities are right to take into account the educational context of students when deciding whom to admit—alongside other information on their achievements and potential.

The Office for Fair Access (OFFA) should remain independent and be strengthened to include figures from outside the higher education sector.

25% or more of extra fee income to universities should be spent on proven outreach work such as summer schools and mentoring.

The Trust plans to publish Higher Education destination statistics for each individual school in the country, showing the numbers of pupils entering higher education, and selective universities in particular.

In addition to concerns about the increase in fee levels in England, the Trust also has concerns about the demise of the national Aimhigher programme and the reduction in funding for the Educational Maintenance Allowance.

27 April 2011


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 10 November 2011