Regeneration - Communities and Local Government Committee Contents


7  Conclusion

131. Regeneration to enable growth offers little evidence that the Government has a coherent strategy for addressing the country's regeneration needs. The document lacks strategic direction and fails to target action and resources at the communities most in need. The measures it sets out are unlikely to bring in sufficient resources or to attract the private sector investment that in many areas is badly needed.

132. We have seen and heard about some of the challenges our most deprived communities currently face. Across the country, regeneration projects have stalled or stopped completely as funding reductions and the absence of finance have taken their toll. The cessation of Housing Market Renewal funding in particular has caused problems for many communities, blighting neighbourhoods across the North and Midlands with row upon row of boarded-up houses. Furthermore, the knowledge and skills of those closely involved in regeneration for many years are now at risk of being lost; a clear approach is needed to ensure they are preserved and passed on.

133. Moreover, the Government has apparently paid little regard to the lessons from previous approaches to regeneration. We have heard that there is much that can be learned from both successful and unsuccessful initiatives, and that the past offers particular lessons about the factors contributing to successful regeneration. In Hulme we saw for ourselves an example of an approach that worked: the Government should be learning from this and looking to create more places like Hulme.

134. Our evidence pointed to a number of actions that, as part of a wider approach, could help to get regeneration projects underway again and to incentivise much needed private sector involvement. More must be done to ensure public land and European funding are used to their full potential. We also look forward to the implementation of Tax Increment Financing and to seeing the contribution this can make to regeneration.

135. We agree with the Government that it is right to move towards a localist approach to regeneration. Communities have to be placed at the heart of initiatives affecting their area; the voluntary and community sector has an important role to play in enabling this. Witnesses, however, have suggested that while the "aspirations" for community-led regeneration are in place, the "practical mechanisms" are lacking. It is not clear that Regeneration to enable growth will give communities the support they need to play a greater role in regeneration.

136. A localist approach to regeneration will also involve political leadership and partnership working across the wider local area. The Community Budgets programme has a crucial role to play in enabling this; the second phase of the Local Government Resource Review should give greater consideration to how Community Budgets can be used in regeneration, including their potential for levering in private investment.

137. We heard many times that there was no 'silver bullet' with which all regeneration problems could be solved. Tackling regeneration requires a joined-up approach and a concerted effort. This emphasises the need for clear strategic direction at the national level, something that, as we have seen, is currently lacking. We recommend that the Government publish a national regeneration strategy that sets out a coherent approach to tackling deprivation in the country's most disadvantaged communities. This strategy should:

  • begin by defining what is meant by regeneration and by emphasising its focus on tackling market failure;
  • explain clearly the action the Government will take to target resources at the communities most in need;
  • provide for the "managed wind-down" of the Housing Market Renewal programme;
  • set out action to mitigate the risk of a skills shortage in regeneration;
  • include a plan for bringing in private sector investment, considering, amongst other things, potential sources of gap funding, the role of initiatives such as Tax Increment Financing and Enterprise Zones, and the contribution that can be made by better use of public land and European funding;
  • put in place mechanisms to enable community groups to play a greater role in regeneration; and
  • explore the potential of the Community Budgets initiative to facilitate a joined up approach to regeneration and to lever in additional private finance.

It is crucial that the strategy be based upon a clear understanding of lessons from previous approaches and of the factors that have contributed to successful regeneration. It must also include a clear set of objectives against which its own success can be measured. We hope that our inquiry and this report presage a more determined focus on the part of Government to tackle the deep-seated problems of market failure and deprivation which still blight too many of our communities.


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2012
Prepared 3 November 2011