Localisation issues in welfare reform - Communities and Local Government Committee Contents



SUPPLEMENTARY WRITTEN SUBMISSION FROM THE
DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

DCLG SELECT COMMITTEE: WELFARE REFORM

In the Select Committee Evidence session on welfare reform on Wednesday 6 July, Mr Rotheram asked if it was correct that under the proposed localisation of Council Tax Benefit, councils in deprived areas stood to be four times off worse off than other councils.

I was not able to respond in detail at the time, as I did not have the analysis to hand. My officials have now looked at the analysis set out in the New Policy Institute Report of October 2010 into the localisation of Council Tax Benefit, on which I understand Mr Rotheram's question was based.

I would like to reassure the Committee that the consultation that we will be issuing shortly will be looking at all aspects of localisation. This will include the principles for distributing the grant which local authorities will be able to use to fund support for council tax in their area. The analysis assumes a straight 10% cut in grant across all authorities. In practice, how this grant is distributed, and what factors the distribution takes account of, will determine the level of saving that individual authorities will need to find. We will actively seek the views of local authorities and others on what factors they believe should be taken into consideration.

By giving local authorities a stake in providing support for council tax, this reform is intended to strengthen the incentive for local authorities to support residents back into employment and so reduce demand for support and lessen the effect of the funding reduction. Localisation also reintroduces the link between council tax levels and the costs of providing support, reinforcing local financial accountability.

July 2011




 
previous page contents


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 13 October 2011