Audit and inspection of local authorities - Communities and Local Government Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Mid Kent Internal Audit

It is suggested that the following issues require attention:-

1.  A review and re-statement of the accounting rules for Local Authorities. This issue is currently before the Economic Affairs Committee of the House of Lords. A critical question has arisen upon the appropriateness or otherwise of the IFRS, which came via an EU Directive and was effectively meant for company Group Accounts. Questions are raised as to whether it would be relevant to return to GAPP. Whilst there are particular conflicts between IFRS and Company law which do not apply to Local Authorities, it should be noted: 1.That the IFRS standards have been mandatorily applied to Local Authorities by the Audit Commission at an additional cost. 2. If it is decided that the private sector should return to GAPP, then there would be an anomaly in retaining IFRS for the public sector.

2.  The question essentially before the Committee is the appointment of the external auditors. There would be a contradiction with the rationale put forward by the Secretary of State to alter the current arrangement of the internal auditors being appointed within the Local Authority. The reasons are: 1. there would be still be an inherent supervision cost 2.The internal auditor is also concerned increasingly and correctly with the review of RISK appraisal.

3.  Hitherto, the choice or selection of the external auditor by the Local Authority has been restricted. There has been an upward spiral of auditing fees lead by the Big Four, which has coalesced with the fees of the Audit Commission. To take an example, the audit fees for a parish council are often disproportionate to the work involved. While more work is clearly required for a District Council concern must be expressed at the standard charges. Again, there cannot be a need for the External Auditor to attend every meeting of the Council Audit Committee.

4.  In summary; there should not be a restriction of market choice, no reduction in quality of firms with competence in Local Authority accounting.

5.  Lastly, it is noted that the NOA will report to Parliament upon ".. the economy, efficiency and productivity of these sectors." Yet the question arises how will this become more focussed and taken forward between the different Authorities.

John Horne
Chairman, Audit Committee
MBC

12 November 2010


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 7 July 2011