Audit and inspection of local authorities - Communities and Local Government Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Mrs J Kissel

1. The Audit Commission should be fit for purpose but because of restrictions and method of delegation it is not. It has expertise.

2. £500,000 million of tax payer's money is demanded annually by Parish and Town Councils (parish councils) which cannot be questioned by District Councils who must tax and collect the sum demanded and pass on to Parish councils as the Precept.

3. I am an elector who did scrutinise Parish Council accounts and who was successful after many years of objections in the publication on the Chipping Campden Town Council on 14 March 2007 of REPORT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE AUDIT COMMISSION ACT 1998 ON DEFICIENCIES IN THE FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS OF THE COUNCIL. (see Audit Commission website).

4.   RESTRICTIONS

4(i)  Can only make "recommendations". No enforcement powers.

4(ii)  Too often Council and clerk seem to do their utmost by delay or intimidaten to avoid scrutiny by electors and the Audit Commission has no power to step in early leaving an elector on his own.

5.   DELEGATION

5(i)   The private commercial accounting firms under contract to Audit Commission oversight is too lax;

5(ii)    Private commercial accounting firms prefer to rubber stamp.

5(iii)   Private commercial accounting firms are not keen to scrutinise unless pushed i.e. by an objection

5(iv)   Private commercial accounting firms rely too heavily on clerk and councillors of the Parish Council for response without investigating themselves.

6.  CONCLUSION/SUGGESTION

6(i)   Proper scrutiny of the spending of £500 million by 70,000 councillors is required

6(ii)   Safeguarding taxpayer's money cannot be undertaken without the power to enforce.

6(iii)   Electors should not have to stand up in place of the auditor.

6(iv)   Private commercial accountancy firms are not the answer.

6(v)   MP's expenses have been resolved. Perhaps similar steps could be utilised and duplicated for councillors spending or an all party investigation of the underlying council procedures in order to clarify the rules required to be administered by the Audit Commission to safe guard tax payers money.

Mrs J Kissel

January 2011


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 7 July 2011