The Unified Patent Court: help or hindrance? - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


3  The draft unitary patent Regulation and agreement on the UPC

Legal base in the EU Treaties

18.  The basis of EU action in the field of intellectual property rights and their protection is Article 118 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU):

    In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish measures for the creation of European intellectual property rights to provide uniform protection of intellectual property rights throughout the Union and for the setting up of centralised Union-wide authorisation, coordination and supervision arrangements.

Articles 3 and 6 to 8 of the draft unitary patent Regulation and co-decision negotiations

19.  Since political agreement ("a general approach") on the unitary patent Regulation was reached in June 2011,[10] it has been the subject of negotiations between the Presidency, the European Parliament and the Commission under the co-decision procedure, with a view to agreeing a deal at first reading. The Council's position in these negotiations was based on the text agreed at the general approach, which we set out below.

20.  Article 3 defines the unitary patent. Articles 6 and 7 define what acts amount to a direct and indirect infringement of the unitary patent, and Article 8 lists areas of activity which are typically patent-free. It is of note that the draft unitary patent Regulation does not define what amounts to a valid unitary patent, or what the scope of a unitary patent should be.

ARTICLE 3—EUROPEAN PATENT WITH UNITARY EFFECT

21.  Article 3 of the Regulation is intended to provide for the creation of the uniformly protected intellectual property right mentioned in Article 118 TFEU:

    (1)  European patents granted with an identical scope of protection in respect of all participating Member States shall benefit from unitary effect in the participating Member States provided that their unitary effect has been registered in the Register for unitary patent protection referred to [...]

    (2)  A European patent with unitary effect shall have a unitary character. It shall provide uniform protection and shall have equal effect in all participating Member States.

    A European patent with unitary effect may only be limited, transferred, revoked or lapse in respect of all the participating Member States.

    A European patent with unitary effect may be licensed in respect of the whole or part of the territories of the participating Member States.

ARTICLE 6—RIGHT TO PREVENT THE DIRECT USE OF THE INVENTION

22.  Article 6(1) provides that "the European patent with unitary effect" (the unitary patent) "shall confer on its proprietor the right to prevent any third party not having the proprietor's consent from the following:

(a)  making, offering, placing on the market or using a product which is the subject matter of the patent, or importing or storing the product for those purposes;

(b)  using a process which is the subject matter of the patent or, where the third party knows, or should have known, that the use of the process is prohibited without the consent of the proprietor of the patent, from offering the process for use within the Member States;

(c)  offering, placing on the market, using, importing or storing for those purposes a product obtained directly by a process which is the subject matter of the patent".[11]

ARTICLE 7—RIGHT TO PREVENT THE INDIRECT USE OF THE INVENTION

23.  Article 7(1) provides that the unitary patent "shall confer on its proprietor the right to prevent any third party from supplying or offering to supply within the participating Member States any person without the proprietor's consent, other than a party entitled to exploit the patented invention, with means, relating to an essential element of that invention, for putting it into effect therein, when the third party knows, or should have known, that those means are suitable and intended for putting that invention into effect."

24.  By virtue of Article 7(2) paragraph 1 above "shall not apply when the means are staple commercial products, except where the third party induces the person supplied to perform any of the acts prohibited by Article 6."

25.  By virtue of Article 7(3) "[p]ersons performing the acts referred to in Article 8(a) to (d) shall not be considered to be parties entitled to exploit the invention within the meaning of paragraph 1."

ARTICLE 8—LIMITATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT WITH UNITARY EFFECT

26.  Article 8 stipulates that the rights conferred by the unitary patent shall not extend to certain acts, including acts done privately for non-commercial purposes, experiments on a patented invention, and trials relating to human and veterinary medicines.

CO-DECISION NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

27.  On 19 January 2012 the Minister wrote to update us on the progress of the co-decision negotiations. She summarised the main changes as follows:

  • New Recital 11a makes reference to provisions on damages in the enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC), not governed by the unitary patent Regulation.
  • Recital 16 and corresponding Article 15(2) refer to taking account of the needs of small and medium sized enterprises in setting fees.
  • New Recital 21b urges participating Member States to ratify the Agreement on the unified patent court in accordance with national constitutional and parliamentary procedures and take steps for the court to be operational as soon as possible.
  • Articles 6-10 are clarified to refer only to territories where the patent has unitary effect (see Article 22).
  • Article 12(2) is expanded to clarify that the Select Committee of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation will consist of representatives of the participating EU Member States, together with an observer from the Commission, and will take decisions with due regard for the position of the Commission.
  • Article 20 is changed so the Commission reports on the operation of the system after three years from the first unitary patent taking effect, and every five years thereafter (from six and six previously).
  • Article 21 is amended to require participating Member States to notify the Commission of implementing measures, adopted by the date in Article 22, or the date from which the unified patent court has exclusive jurisdiction in that Member State.
  • Article 22(2) sets out the application date of the Regulation as being 1 January 2014 or the date of entry into force of the Agreement on the unified patent court, whichever is later. European patents shall only have unitary effect for the participating Member States in which the unified patent court has exclusive jurisdiction at the date of registration (of the unitary effect). The consequence of this should be that the European patent has effect as a national patent in other States designated in the application, providing any national requirements are met.
  • Article 22(4a) distinguishes between the date of 1 January 2014 for ensuring administrative arrangements are in place at the European Patent Office as required by Article 12, and the date for implementation of measures ensuring that unitary effect can be inscribed in the European Patent Register which must be by the time the unified patent court has exclusive jurisdiction for the state concerned.

Overview of the draft Agreement to establish the UPC

28.  Article 1 establishes the creation of the UPC as a court common to the contracting States with exclusive jurisdiction for European patents and European patents with unitary effect (unitary patents). Article 2 provides definitions for certain terms used in the agreement. Article 3 describes the scope of the UPC's jurisdiction. Articles 3a and 3b deal with legal status and liability of the UPC. Article 4 specifies that the UPC will be made up of a court of first instance, a court of appeal and a registry. Articles 5-9 outline the functions of these parts of the court.

29.  Articles 10-14 outline the duties and obligations of judges of the UPC, including eligibility criteria, appointment and training (see further below).

30.  Article 14a specifies that the UPC shall respect the primacy of EU law and apply the entire body of EU law. Article 14b makes provisions to ensure the proper application and uniform interpretation of EU law. Specifically, provisions are made to ensure the UPC refers questions on the interpretation of EU law to the Court of Justice. Article 14c sets out joint liability of the contracting States should the UPC fail to apply EU law. Article 14d requires that the contracting States ensure the UPC complies with their obligations under EU law. Decisions of the UPC will be directly attributable to the contracting States.

31.  Article 14e-14i sets out the applicable law for the UPC, including listing allowable defences within the court. Articles 15 (bifurcation—see further below) and 16 describe the jurisdiction of the UPC. Article 17 allows for the creation of mediation and arbitration centres.

32.  Articles 18-21 set out the financing requirements of the UPC (see further below). The court shall be self-financing with fees set and reviewed periodically by an administrative committee. Any shortfall in the budget of the court would be provided by the contracting States.

33.  Articles 21a-28 set out the organisational and procedural provisions relating to the UPC; this includes outlining who is responsible for representing parties in the UPC.

34.  Articles 29-31 describe the language arrangements of the Court (see further below). Articles 32-34 set out the procedures before the UPC and the rules for evidence.

35.  Articles 34a-44a deal with the powers of the UPC, including the provision of temporary and permanent injunctions. Articles 45-47 set out how appeals will be dealt with.

36.  Articles 49-56 describe the method that the UPC will use to reach decisions and then to ensure that the decisions are enforced.

37.  Articles 57-57b present the details of how the UPC will be implemented and operated following agreement.

38.  Article 58 outlines the transitional arrangements for pre-existing European patents (see further below). In particular, it allows holders of European patents applied for or granted before the UPC is created to opt-out of the jurisdiction of the UPC.

39.  Articles 58a-60 set out the requirements for the entry into force of the agreement.

Key Articles of the Agreement

SEPARATION OF INFRINGEMENT AND VALIDITY—BIFURCATION

40.  Article 15 provides that if in a claim for infringement a defendant raises a counterclaim that the patent is invalid, the local and regional divisions have a discretion to either:

  • hear both claims together; or
  • hear the infringement claim and refer the validity claim to the Central Division; or
  • suspend the infringement claim and refer the validity claim to the Central Division; or refer both claims to the Central Division (if both parties agree).

41.  Infringement cases may be brought in a local or regional division provided that Member State or region is where:

  • the alleged infringement occurred; or
  • the defendant resides or carries out business.

42.  If there is no appropriate local or regional division, infringement cases can be brought in the Central Division.

43.  Validity claims must be brought in the Central Division. However, if the patent concerned is already the subject of infringement proceedings in a local or regional division, then the validity claim must be brought in the same local or regional division.

COSTS

44.  Article 18 provides that the UPC will be funded by contracting States during the transition period. Afterwards, it will be self-financing; court fees shall consist of a fixed fee and a value-based fee above a certain threshold which is yet to be defined.

45.  By virtue of Article 19 contracting States which host central, regional or local divisions will be responsible for providing the necessary facilities; contracting States' contributions to the UPC are yet to be defined.

LANGUAGES

46.  Article 19 obliges local divisions to use the language of that contracting State and regional divisions to use the language designated by the States sharing it. If both parties agree, or the panel of judges so decides, the language of proceedings can be changed to that of the patent.

47.  The Central Division will use the language of the patent (English, French or German).

JUDGES

48.  Article 10 provides that judges of the UPC "shall ensure the highest standards of competence and proven experience in the field of patent litigation." Technically qualified judges must have expertise in both patent litigation and the relevant area of technology.

49.  Article 14 states that a framework for the continuous training of judges will be established.

50.  Article 6 concerns judges of the court of first instance. No panel may have three judges with the same nationality. For local divisions with little experience, panels must have one judge from the hosting Member State and two with different nationalities. The remaining local divisions must have panels with two judges from the hosting Member State and one with a different nationality. Any party or panel may request that an additional technically qualified judge is allocated to the panel.

51.  Panels of the Central Division must have one judge with qualifications in the area of the technology concerned.

52.  Article 7 concerns the court of appeal. Panels must have five judges. Three judges must be both legally qualified and of different nationalities. Two judges must have technical qualifications in the area of technology concerned.

EXCLUSIVITY AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS

53.  Article 15 gives the UPC exclusive competence for European patents and unitary patents.

54.  By virtue of Article 58 the transition period for the UPC will be seven years. During this period, proceedings concerning (non-unitary) European patents may still be initiated before national courts. Existing holders of European patents and those applying for European patents may also opt in or out of the exclusive competence of the UPC during this period.

55.  A review of the UPC will be carried out five years after the UPC Agreement comes into force. Following this review, the transition period may be extended by up to another seven years.

The Statute of the UPC

56.  The draft Statute outlines the institutional and financial arrangements for the UPC. Articles 2-9a set out the requirements for judges, including the eligibility criteria, their appointment and how they should serve in office. Articles 10-12a outline the arrangements for governing the new court system. Articles 13-15 set out how the Court of First Instance should function including the composition of panels. Article 16 sets out the requirements for the composition of panels of the Court of Appeal. Articles 17-20 define the functions of the Registrar. Articles 22-32 present the financial arrangements for the UPC. This includes the framework for adopting the budget each year. Articles 33-37 deal with the process of reaching decisions within the UPC and how dissenting opinions with be dealt with. Annex II to the Statute lists the topics to be included within the Rules of Procedure.


10   The Committee lifted the scrutiny reserve on the draft Regulation, under paragraph 3(b) of the scrutiny reserve resolution, in order for the Minister to be able to agree to the general approach. Back

11   The text of the Regulation and the proposed revisions can be found on the Council's website in the form of a limité document which has been made public: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/11/st17/st17578.en11.pdf ("Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection - Analysis of the final compromise text"). Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2012
Prepared 3 May 2012