Lessons from PFI and other projects - Public Accounts Committee Contents


Supplementary written evidence from Infrastructure UK, HM Treasury

NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE—THE PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF HOSPITAL PFI CONTRACTS 17 JUNE 2010

1.  I am writing to you following your request for updated information arising from the above-mentioned NAO report. This was requested at the 15 June 2011 Public Accounts Committee hearing.

2.  In paragraph 13 of the Summary of the NAO's report it stated that nine of the contracts had no-one assigned to contract management.

13  Some Trusts are not, however, devoting sufficient resources to contract management. Many Trusts have recently increased the resources they devote to the management of their PFI contracts. These Trusts realised that managing the contracts was a greater challenge than they had at first thought. However, nine of the 76 PFI contracts (12%) have no one assigned to contract management.

However in paragraph 3.6 of the main body of the report, the NAO state that the nine contracts have less than 0.2 Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") staff managing the contract.

3.6  But some Trust teams are too small to cover the basic list of tasks necessary to protect value for money. We consider that the minimum requirement to run even a small PFI contract effectively is one contract manager spending the majority of his or her time managing the contract. Twenty-seven Trusts (36%) have less than one full time person managing their contract. A further nine (12%) do not have anyone spending a day a week managing their PFI contract (Figure 12 overleaf).

I asked the NAO to clarify this and their position remains that a resource of less than 0.2 FTE is equivalent to "no one assigned to contract management".

3.  I wrote to the Chief Executives of all of the Trusts that previously reported less than 0.2 FTE contract management resource to confirm the level of contract management resource now available, and reminded them of the NAO's recommendation. In response,

2 Trusts previously reported less than 0.2 FTE now report 1 or more FTE contract management resource.

1 Trust previously reported less than 0.2 FTE now reports 5.5 FTE contract management resource across their six PFI projects.

2 Trusts previously reported less than 0.2 FTE now report 0.25 FTE contract management resource. Both PFI projects are hard FM only.

2 Trusts previously reported less than 0.2 FTE now report 0.2 FTE contract management resource. Both PFI projects are Hard FM only.

1 Trust previously reported less than 0.2 FTE is currently reorganising its project management resource with a view to combining their resource with a neighbouring Trust which has existing PFIs.

1 Trust previously reported less than 0.2FTE continues to report less than 0.2 FTE contract management resource. This is hard and soft fm but is a small project with an annual service payment of £2.4 million.


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 1 September 2011