Out of the jam: reducing congestion on our roads - Transport Committee Contents


5  The relevance of the Highway Code and road user behaviour

51.  The overwhelming view from the evidence we received was that aspects of poor road user behaviour lead to increased congestion, particularly in two key respects. Firstly, by directly causing incidents and accidents, often linked to safety issues; and secondly, by inappropriate road use, which is not necessarily unsafe, but which adversely affects the flow of traffic. Assistant Chief Constable Nick Croft cited road rage, 'undertaking' and bad lane discipline as all making incidents and accidents more likely to happen, thereby adversely affecting the general flow of traffic[96] and Nich Brown, of the Motorcycle Action Group gave the example of when vehicle users are told that a two-lane road will narrow into one lane 800 metres ahead, and everyone attempts to get into the open lane at once, instead of filtering alternatively and keeping the traffic flowing.[97] The Minister, Mike Penning MP, said he was concerned about how to ensure that drivers were taught not just to pass a driving test, but to drive responsibly:

Whether it is with young people or older people, they should drive appropriately. Have they been educated? Do they have the skills to do that and does the test produce that for them? My personal view is that at the moment the test is better than it was, but we are still teaching people to pass a test, not giving them skills so that they do not drive inappropriately on our roads.[98]

52.  Some of the more innovative local authorities have established road safety policies that highlight road use behaviour. Surrey County Council, for example, highlights its DriveSMART initiative:

We should work with and not against motorists. So our road safety policy focuses more on helping people to be safe rather than on penalising them for unsafe driving. We also work closely with Surrey Police to tackle inconsiderate driving. This includes tackling actions which might not be unsafe but which do annoy or cause distress to residents—for example inconsiderate parking. A couple of years ago we introduced an initiative called DriveSMART as a joint programme with Surrey police. This aims to improve safety and reduce inconsiderate driving mainly by education and encouragement, although we will take enforcement action when justified. DriveSMART includes poster campaigns and advice on good driving.[99]

53.  The DfT launched an annual £4 million Road Safety Partnership Scheme, which invites bids from all local highway authorities in England. The scheme promotes joint partnership among road safety professionals, schools, the youth service, the voluntary sector and health sector and encourages the dissemination of best practice across local areas. Welcome though the Road Safety Partnership Scheme undoubtedly is, we question whether there are sufficient funds for highway authorities to take up successful schemes more widely, especially when road safety funds are no longer ring-fenced and local authorities are under financial pressure. Furthermore, we again urge the Government to prioritise work on making the driving test more rigorous, in order to ensure that young drivers are better trained and safer. We made recommendations on this in March of this year and our predecessors also made recommendations in 2007. We are not persuaded that the Government is prioritising this issue and we will return to it in our forthcoming inquiry into the new strategic framework for road safety.

54.  The Department publishes the Highway Code, which sets out legislation and guidance applying to all road users, including pedestrians and cyclists, as well as motorists. We scrutinised the role that the Highway Code could play in improving road user behaviour. The Institute of Highway Engineers argued that there was no problem with the contents of the Code, but road users do not always keep up with changes to road signs, guidance on the law after they have passed their driving test and, as a result, "the Highway Code is ... largely ineffective as a means of engaging with the vast majority of road users".[100] It is not only motorists who do not adhere to the Highway Code. Majeed Neky of Living Streets told us about the problem of some cyclists' road behaviour:

We would very much support the role of cycle training and encouraging responsible cycling that meets the interests of all road users, including pedestrians. [...] We recognise there is a minority of cyclists who engage in antisocial cycling behaviour, such as failing to stop at crossings, riding on pavements, etc. We advocate vigorous and renewed enforcement of that, but we also want to see it within the broader picture of conditions on the roads for cyclists and pedestrians.[101]

55.  Cadence Driver Development advocated a simplified version of the Highway Code:

Much of what is written could be extracted to form additional modules, thereby enhancing the novice driver curriculum and could be used to form a simplified, user-friendly and pocket-sized legal guide, with the emphasis on 'legal' as this would assist drivers in knowing their responsibilities. It would be cost-effective to send copies directly to schools, colleges, libraries and local government offices. The general public could receive their copies at the same time as their applications for a Driving Licence or at the time of annual VED [Vehicle Excise Duty] renewal. [102]

Evidence from ITS UK also suggested ways of making the Highway Code more relevant:

It needs to be disseminated and generally publicised in a way that it is seen as having direct and immediate relevance on a daily basis. The use of web, 'podcast', 'apps', and other 'new media 'should be considered in the dissemination of such messages.[103]

The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) website is the first port of call for anyone renewing their car tax disc and for applying or renewing their driving licence. While there are direct links to sites including 'Direct Gov', 'Think! Road Safety' and the Department's own website, there is no link to the Highway Code website. Such a link would be simple to include and would reach a large number of road users.

56.  The Department for Transport should take steps to make the Highway Code more readily available to all road users, in particular more experienced drivers and cyclists. The Government should work with the various road user groups to promote better adherence to the Highway Code. The DVLA website should clearly link to the Highway Code, for all those applying for or renewing a driving licence. A leaflet drawing attention to the Code, highlighting any recent changes, should be posted to drivers with tax disk or licence renewal letters and other correspondence. The Department should consider options for a free Highway Code 'App', which gives useful and new information about The Highway Code, and other ways in which new communication media could be utilised for this purpose. These cost-effective recommendations would go a long way to disseminate information included in the Highway Code and help improve driver behaviour.


96   Ev 50 Back

97   Ev 4 Back

98   Ev 67 Back

99   Ev 97 Back

100   Ev 107 Back

101   Ev 8 Back

102   Ev 184 Back

103   Ev 83 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 15 September 2011