DFID's programme in Zambia - International Development Committee Contents


7  Graduation from aid

70. DFID's Annual Report and Accounts for 2011-12 state that 'DFID's key challenge is to help Zambia grow into a sustainable middle income country using its own resources.... and graduate from aid'.[92] The Report and Accounts do not make a similar statement about any other country, including countries with similar per capita incomes such as Ghana or neighbouring countries such as Tanzania and Kenya or countries with large GDPs such as India. Zambia, as this report has shown, suffers from severe rural poverty and is off-track on several MDGs.

71. We raised the issue of graduation from aid with the DFID team in Zambia and questioned the Minister about it. He replied:

    In Zambia, we do not have a timetable for graduation...The right mindset for the way we design our programmes and approach for all of us, beyond humanitarian, is that we should all be seeking over time to graduate from being in an aid relationship, and to move towards proper state-to-state trade and other diplomatic and political relations. Whether that is going to be in five years or 50 years-on certain projections, one could look at Zambia and extrapolate figures that suggest it could be 70 years.

    ..this approach helps to school and discipline the thinking behind making sure that we are doing the right things either to address MDGs or to put in place essential basic services...[93]

72. DFID's Annual Report and Accounts for 2011-12 states that DFID is working to help Zambia graduate from aid. We note that no similar comment is made in the Report and Accounts about any other country, including those with a similar per capita incomes. We agree that DFID should work towards graduating from aid, but this should apply to all countries. Given the extent of poverty we do not believe that Zambia will be in a position to graduate from aid for many years and are pleased that the Minister agrees.


92   DFID, Annual Report and Accounts, 2011-12, p 71 Back

93   Q 65 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2012
Prepared 6 September 2012