Tax in Developing Countries: Increasing Resources for Development - International Development Committee Contents


1  Introduction

1. Tax is an issue of fundamental importance for development. If developing countries are to escape from aid dependency, and from poverty more broadly, it is imperative that their revenue authorities are able to collect taxes effectively. Tax revenues represent a more predictable and sustainable source of revenue than aid flows ever can.[1] In addition, the ability to collect taxes also has implications for the quality of governance. Taxpayers have a legitimate right to expect something in return— namely a functioning state—so are more likely to hold their governments to account if they underperform. Citizens or companies which fall outside the tax 'net' are much less likely to do this.[2]

Country-level tax profiles

2. The position of tax revenues within the wider economy varies widely between countries. In developing countries, tax revenues as a percentage of GDP are generally significantly lower than in developed countries. Table 1 illustrates this:Table 1: tax revenues by country category
Country category Average tax revenues (% of GDP)
Low Income Countries (LICs) 13.0
Lower Middle Income Countries (LMICs) 17.7
Upper Middle Income Countries (UMICs) 20.7
High Income Countries (HICs) / OECD members 35.4

Data source: Ev w85

3. Moreover, the forms of taxation which predominate tend to be very different in developing countries vis-a-vis developed countries. Personal income taxation tends to constitute only a very small proportion of the tax take in developing countries, whilst customs duties and other forms of trade-based taxation constitute a much more significant share.[3] Furthermore, as we were told by Dr Jonathan Di John, Senior Lecturer in Political Economy at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), local property taxation is "a very important tax because it would be the main source of funding for local government, and it is negligible in even middle-income countries, let alone poor ones."[4]

4. Our Report begins (Chapter 2) with a consideration of how the policies of developing country governments affect their ability to collect tax revenues. In Chapter 3, we consider how developing countries' tax revenues are affected by legislation enacted beyond their borders. We make recommendations to the Government, both on measures it could take unilaterally, and on measures which need to be taken at intergovernmental level, and for which it should advocate. In Chpater 4, we assess the work which the UK Government is presently conducting on tax in developing countries, and make recommendations as to how this could be improved.

5. As part of our inquiry, we conducted a case study of Zambia. Our reasons for choosing Zambia were various. Firstly, as illustrated by Table 2, it is a country whose economy is heavily dependent on copper mining:Table 2: exports of fuels and mining products from Zambia
Year2006 20072008 20092010
Exports of fuels and mining products (% of GDP) 2931 2827 37

Data source: adapted from WTO, World Bank

The size of the mining sector makes it a highly relevant case study, not only because a number of major multinational mining companies operate in Zambia, but also because resource-rich countries tend to face particular challenges in respect of taxation.[5] Moreover, Zambia is no longer a Low Income Country (LIC), having been re-classified as a Lower Middle Income Country (LMIC) in 2011[6]—so attention will naturally turn to the question of its graduation from aid, and the role taxation can play in this. Finally, it has a large DFID programme, including the provision of technical assistance to the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA).[7]

6. We received 37 pieces of written evidence from a wide range of organisations, and also held three oral evidence sessions. Witnesses at the oral evidence sessions included the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); leading academics from the London School of Economics (LSE), SOAS, and the Institute of Development Studies (IDS); as well as NGOs, corporations, DFID, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and the Treasury. Finally, we visited Zambia in March 2012, holding meetings with the Ministry of Finance and the ZRA, and visiting the Copperbelt.


1   Q 41 Back

2   Ev w86 Back

3   Ev w85 Back

4   Q 51 Back

5   Paul Collier, The Plundered Planet (London, 2010), p 51-52. Back

6   "Changes in Country Classifications", World Bank, 1 July 2011, data.worldbank.org  Back

7   Ev 93; DFID Zambia, Operational Plan 2011-2015 (updated June 2012) Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2012
Prepared 23 August 2012