Scrutiny of Arms Exports (2012): UK Strategic Export Controls Annual Report 2010, Quarterly Reports for July to December 2010 and January to September 2011, the Government's Review of arms exports to the Middle East and North Africa, and control issues - Business, Innovation and Skills Committee Contents


4  The Committees' questions on the Government's quarterly information on arms export licences

16. The Export Control Organisation (ECO) within the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, publishes details of the arms export licences that have been granted, refused or appealed for each Quarter. These are known as the Pivot Reports. The information in these Reports is of great importance, and the Quarterly Reports are subject to detailed scrutiny by the Committees. This invariably results in the Committees putting a series of detailed questions to the Government, to which the Government provides answers to the CAEC.

17. The Committees wish to see the maximum disclosure by the Government of information about UK arms exports that is consistent with safeguarding the UK's security and trade interests. The Chairman of the CAEC wrote to the Foreign Secretary on 24 October 2011 strongly resisting the Government's decision to classify as "Restricted for CAEC eyes only" the entirety of its answers to the Committees' questions on the Quarter 3 and Quarter 4 2010 Arms Export Licensing information provided by the Government.[21] The Chairman, Sir John Stanley, proposed a substantial declassification of the information the Committees had received. The Chairman wrote a further letter to the Foreign Secretary on 16 December 2011 pressing for a reply to his letter of the 24 October.[22] No reply having been received by the time the Foreign Secretary gave Oral evidence to the Committees on 7 February 2012, the Chairman again pressed the Foreign Secretary for the outstanding reply.[23] The reply was finally received in the Foreign Secretary's letter to the Chairman of 21 February in which the Foreign Secretary accepted in large part the disclosure proposals put to the Government by the Chairman on behalf of the Committees.[24] The Committees' questions on the Government's arms export licensing decisions and the Government's non-classified answers for Quarter 3 and Quarter 4 of 2010 and for Quarters 1, 2, and 3 for 2011 are set out in full in Annex 1 of this Report. This information is being made public in the Committees' Report for the first time.

18. We conclude that the Government was right to accept the Chairman of the CAEC's representations on behalf of the Committees that to a substantial degree the Government's answers to the Committees' questions on the Government's Quarterly arms export reports could be declassified and thereby made available to Parliament and the wider public in this Report as from Q3 2010 for the first time. The Committees recommend that both in the Government's Quarterly arms export reports and in its answers to the Committees' questions on those reports, the Government should provide the maximum disclosure of information on a non-classified basis consistent with safeguarding the UK's security and trade interests.

Errors in export controls to Somalia

19. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the FCO, Alistair Burt, wrote to the Committees on 6 February 2012 to inform the Committees that following their questions on the Quarter 2 2011 Report the Government had found that there had been a potential breach of UN sanctions relating to an export licence issued for Somalia.[25] The licence was for body armour for a humanitarian de-mining organisation. When the application was initially assessed the export had been considered as temporary when it should have been considered as permanent. Due to this error an incorrect exemption under the arms embargo was applied and the UN Sanctions Committee was not notified of the proposed export. Following discovery of this error a review of all export licence applications for Somalia was undertaken and a further two cases in 2009 where the Sanctions Committee should have been notified were identified. Both of these licences authorised the export of armoured vehicles for the protection of UNICEF staff.

20. The Minister advised the Committees that a review of export licences for a number of other embargoed countries from 1 January 2009 onwards had been carried out. He stated in his letter that: "I am satisfied that these three cases were isolated administrative errors and there is no wider systemic failure in our handling of export licence applications for embargoed countries."[26]

21. The CAEC concludes that the Government was correct in informing the Committees of a potential breach by the UK Government of UN sanctions relating to three export licences issued for Somalia after 1 January 2009. The Committees recommend that in its Response to this Report the Government provides an assurance to the Committees that they will be informed, and informed promptly, of any future actual or potential breaches of arms export controls by the UK Government, whether in relation to embargoed countries or in relation to any or all UK strategic export controls that are in place.


21   Ev 148 - Letter to the Foreign Secretary dated 24 October 2011 Back

22   Ev 151 - Letter to the Foreign Secretary dated 16 December 2011  Back

23   Q 108 Back

24   Ev 167 - Letter from the Foreign Secretary dated 21 February 2012 Back

25   Ev 164 - Letter from Alistair Burt dated 6 February 2012 Back

26   Ev 164 - Letter from Alistair Burt dated 6 February 2012 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2012
Prepared 13 July 2012