2 The engineering skills gap
Needs of engineering employers
7. The UK's engineering sector comprises over
half a million engineering companies employing 5.4 million people.[10]
The Royal Academy of Engineering explained that "the current
engineering skills base is complex as engineering skills are deployed
in all sectors of the economy".[11]
It estimated that there are 2.3 million "skilled people in
the engineering-related skills base" making up eight per
cent of the UK workforce.[12]
This engineering workforce
produces "one fifth of the national [Gross Domestic Product]
and half of UK exports".[13]
Engineering UK stated:
In 2010, the engineering sector generated £1.15
trillion turnover, 25% of all UK turnoverthree times the
size of the financial services sector. Of the 2.1 million businesses
in the UK, 550,000 are engineering businesses employing 5.6 million
people19% of the work force.[14]
8. We wanted to determine whether there was a
need to improve engineering education and skills in the UK and
particularly whether the current skills base met the needs of
engineering employers.[15]
Despite the size and productivity of the engineering sector, the
evidence put forward by engineering employers overwhelmingly pointed
to a worsening skills gap, both in the number and quality of engineers.
For example, the Engineering Employers Federation (EEF) stated:
Companies strived to hold onto skills during the
recession, and as demand has picked up again, more and more businesses
are reporting difficulties in recruiting skilled workers they
need to occupy jobs. Furthermore, manufacturers expect the problem
to escalate with two-thirds of manufacturers predicting difficulties
recruiting production staff in the next five years. This concern
is shared by all companies, regardless of size or sector.[16]
9. The Royal Academy of Engineering has estimated
that around 820,000 science, engineering and technology (SET)
professionals will be required by 2020, with 80 per cent of these
required in engineering.[17]
Lyn Tomkins, UK Operations Director, Sector Skills Council for
Science, Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies (SEMTA), stated
"we need something like 82,000 engineers and technicians
just to deal with retirements to 2016".[18]
Engineering UK stated "the demand for skilled engineers and
technicians is strong; for example, the Technician Council estimates
there will be a demand for 450,000 technicians by 2020".[19]
One indicator that the economy needs more graduate level engineers
is "a persistent, sizeable wage premium for people holding
engineering degrees" that has grown over the last 20 years.[20]
Professor Alison Wolf's 2011 Review of Vocational Education
noted that "the shortage of maths and science skills [...]
is reflected in the fact that virtually every home student who
applies for an engineering degree is offered a place,
at a time when more and
more applicants, overall, do not secure entry to university".[21]
Differences in career routes for engineers and technicians are
explored in the next chapter.
10. As well as the sheer gap in numbers, the
quality of engineers entering the workforce was also a focus of
concern. For example, National Grid stated:
We are able to fill our vacancies currently, but
this does not mean that we are generally satisfied with the adequacy
of the engineering skill base in the UK. We currently screen some
25,000 applications in order to get some 280 trainees. Our observation
is that the number of applicants with the competence and qualities
we seek is not appreciably greater than the number we recruit,
which implies a significant underlying weakness in supply for
the skills we require.[22]
British Airways has found that while "the applicants
and intake for industrial apprentices are of a high standard academically",
they "lack hand skills and airmanship" such as "an
understanding of working in an industrial area and of safety and
regulatory requirements in an engineering situation".[23]
The quality of engineering
education and skills provision will be covered in more detail
in the next chapter of this Report.
11. As a consequence of the skills gap, the engineering
industry "is struggling to recruit engineers" and consequently
some companies have to recruit from outside the UK.[24]
SEMTA stated that "31% of high tech manufacturing firms 'had
recruited people from outside the UK owing to a lack of suitably
qualified people from within the UK'".[25]
However, as the Royal Academy of Engineering highlighted, recruiting
from the international labour market is complicated by visa restrictions
and "in certain sectors (such as defence) this is not an
option".[26]
Why we need more engineers
12. The UK's need for engineers will be driven
by various factors, including replacement demand due to engineers
leaving the labour market and expansion in some sectors, such
as nuclear new build and Information and Communications Technology
(ICT).[27] The Royal
Academy of Engineering highlighted the need for 830,000 SET professionals
by 2020 "with a high proportion being engineers" and
stated that "surveys [...] show that this demand will not
be met by fresh graduates from UK universities" as there
were "only 89,000 STEM graduates per year".[28]
13. Economic growth is a central ambition of
the Government and crucial to the UK's global competitiveness.[29]
The Government stated in its 2011 Plan for Growth that
"we should determine to become a world-leader in, for example,
advanced manufacturing, life sciences, creative industries, green
energy and non-financial business services".[30]
The Government considers that "manufacturing
has been, and continues to be an important part of the UK economy".[31]
The Plan for Growth noted that "manufacturing
is the third largest sector in the UK economy after professional
and business services and the retail sector in terms of share
of UK GDP" yet acknowledged that "the supply of STEM
skills still falls short of anticipated demand for technicians
and engineers".[32]
In November 2012, Lord Heseltine's report No stone unturned
in pursuit of growth stated that "UK industry [...] appears
to be relatively less skills intensive and employs fewer graduates
in professional and technical occupations than its major competitors"
and that "no boom in growth can be achieved without a significant
rethink as to how we develop skills in this country - both funding
training and its delivery".[33]
When we asked Matthew Hancock MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary
of State for Skills, how improving engineering skills fitted into
the Government's growth agenda, he confirmed that it was "critical".[34]
14. Other engineering sectors are also crucial
to the achievement of Government policies and ambitions. Two recent
examples are: the Energy and Climate Change Committee expressed
concern at the shortage of skilled scientists and engineers in
its 2012 report on the Future of Marine Renewables in the UK,[35]
and the Lords Science and Technology Committee noted that nuclear
new build plans required significant numbers of STEM graduates
over the next decade.[36]
In general, the UK needs to:
maintain capability in civil engineering, engineering
construction, electricity production and distribution, gas, water
and sanitation, transportation, process manufacture, nuclear engineering,
electronics, food manufacture, fuels, high-value materials, consumer
products, IT, software and healthcare services. All depend on
engineering knowledge and skills.[37]
15. Despite the Government's
recognition of the importance of engineering skills, particularly
to the growth agenda, there is a persistent gap in the numbers
of engineers required to achieve economic growth, which is likely
to worsen unless radical action is taken.
Diversity in engineering
16. The statistics we received on the under-representation
of women in engineering varied, no doubt due to different methods
of gathering data, but are stark nonetheless. The Royal Academy
of Engineering stated that "only six per cent of people in
engineering occupations are women".[38]
The EEF provided international comparisons: "only nine per
cent of engineering professionals are women compared to 18 per
cent in Spain, 20 per cent in Italy and 26 per cent in Sweden".[39]
The EEF added that "nearly two-thirds of men who graduated
in engineering and technology disciplines entered employment within
engineering and technology", whereas "for women this
figure was [...] 45.8 per cent".[40]
Education for Engineering (E4E) explained that under-representation
was not due to a lack of ability as, for example, "a higher
proportion of females achieve A*-C grades in at least two science
GCSEs and in mathematics GCSE compared with males".[41]
A leakage of female students then progressively occurs in physics
A-level, an important precursor to engineering undergraduate degrees,
as "only around 20% of the cohort for physics A level are
female" and in higher education "the proportion of women
in engineering subjects falls to around 12%".[42]
17. Several written submissions also mentioned
the representation of ethnic minorities in engineering, which
was less straightforward. E4E differentiated between different
ethnic groups, stating that "there is considerable variation
in participation and attainment in sciences and mathematics at
[Key Stage 4] across different ethnic groups".[43]
For example, "there is under-representation of Black pupils
in high-attaining maths/science cohorts at GCSE while there is
substantial over-representation of Chinese/Asian pupils in high-attaining
science and maths cohorts at GCSE".[44]
EADS UK stated that because it "is not unusual now to see
over 30% of the [higher education and postgraduate] intake from
overseas", the student body "is far more diverse than
the UK population, except for gender".[45]
Therefore a crucial point was that "the issue here is not
so much about having [diversity] as the opportunity (or lack of
it) for different groups in UK society".[46]
18. Engineering employers recognised the need
to improve diversity, particularly given the demand for skilled
engineers. SEMTA stated that "enabling the entry of underrepresented
groups and particularly women into professions which are traditionally
and predominantly male is economically vital".[47]
Andrew Churchill, Managing Director, JJ Churchill Ltd., stated
that women were "half of our potential pool of recruits,
and to ignore it would be criminal at a time when we are short
of skills. It is unconscionable and it makes bad sense".[48]
19. The lack of gender and ethnic diversity in
engineering adds to the already significant skills gap. This is
not a new issue and several organisations and initiatives exist
to improve diversity in STEM[49]
subjects and the workforce. For example, the Royal Academy of
Engineering runs a "Diversity in Engineering programme that
is funded [by Government] to the order of about £250,000
per year over the four-year spending review period".[50]
However, EADS UK, an aerospace and defence company, indicated
that many organisations exist to improve diversity but "tend
to focus on gender equality" even though "under-represented
ethnic groups also need support".[51]
Richard Earp, Education and Skills Manager at National Grid, stated
"the reality [...] is that we have not moved the dial very
far, for instance, in terms of female participation in engineering
degrees. [...] One could conclude that none of this effort has
been successful".[52]
More optimistically, the Baker Dearing Educational Trust considered
that "a lot of good work is already being done to promote
careers in [STEM]" and that "these efforts are making
a difference and must continue".[53]
20. In this chapter we have outlined the gaps
in the engineering skills base with regards to the numbers, quality
and diversity of engineers, in order to provide a backdrop for
the remainder of the Report. These issues will be explored further
throughout the Report. The next chapter focuses on the different
educational and training options in engineering available for
people aged 14-19 years.
10 "Engineering UK 2013: The state of Engineering",
Engineering UK, www.engineeringuk.com Back
11
Ev 56 para 4 Back
12
Ibid Back
13
Ibid Back
14
Ev w50 Back
15
This report focuses mostly on the needs of engineering businesses;
however, the issues will generally also apply to public sector
employers. Back
16
Ev 74 para 5 Back
17
Ev w30 para 2 Back
18
Q 3 Back
19
Ev w50 Back
20
"Jobs and Growth, The importance of engineering skills to
the UK economy", Royal Academy of Engineering, September
2012, www.raeng.org.uk Back
21
Department of Education, Review of Vocational Education -
The Wolf Report, March 2011, page 76 Back
22
Ev 53 para 4.1 Back
23
Ev w70 para 1.1 Back
24
Ev w51 Back
25
Ev 64 para 3 Back
26
"Jobs and Growth, The importance of engineering skills to
the UK economy", Royal Academy of Engineering, September
2012, www.raeng.org.uk Back
27
"Jobs and Growth, The importance of engineering skills to
the UK economy", para 4, Royal Academy of Engineering, September
2012, www.raeng.org.uk; Q 141 [Dr Bill Mitchell] Back
28
"Jobs and Growth, The importance of engineering skills to
the UK economy", Royal Academy of Engineering, September
2012, www.raeng.org.uk Back
29
HM Treasury, The Plan for Growth, March 2011, page 3 Back
30
HM Treasury, The Plan for Growth, March 2011, page 3 Back
31
"Manufacturing", Department for Business, Innovation
and Skills, webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk Back
32
HM Treasury, The Plan for Growth, March 2011, page 85 Back
33
Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, No stone unturned
in pursuit of growth, October 2012, page 21 Back
34
Q 191 Back
35
Energy and Climate Change Committee, Eleventh Report of Session
2012-13, The Future of Marine Renewables in the UK, HC
1624 Back
36
House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, Third Report
of Session 2010-12, Nuclear Research and Development Capabilities,
HL 221, paras 118-127 Back
37
"Jobs and Growth, The importance of engineering skills to
the UK economy", Royal Academy of Engineering, September
2012, www.raeng.org.uk, page 5 Back
38
Ev 59 [RAEng] para 20 Back
39
Ev 77 para 40 Back
40
Ev 78 para 41 Back
41
Ev w40 para 44 Back
42
Ibid Back
43
Ev w38 para 19 Back
44
Ibid Back
45
Ev w25 para 5.5 Back
46
Ibid Back
47
Ev72 para 29 Back
48
Q 36 Back
49
Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths Back
50
Q 155 [Dr Matthew Harrison] Back
51
Ev w25 para 5.3 Back
52
Q 37 Back
53
Ev w8 para 37 Back
|