|
In September 2012, the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) announced a consultation process on proposals to merge the British Antarctic Survey and National Oceanography Centre. It argued that there was a strong strategic case for the merger, arising from scientific synergies between the organisations, a drive to maximise the social and economic impact of scientific research output and a need to make the most cost-effective use of marine and polar infrastructure. NERC was due to make its final decision on merging these institutes in December 2012. However, in October 2012, it announced that this decision would be brought forward, citing concerns about the effects of uncertainty regarding the future of the organisations.
A number of serious concerns have been raised with us about the prospect of merging the British Antarctic Survey and National Oceanography Centre, and the way in which the consultation has been handled. We consider it important that these concerns are addressed by NERC before any further action is taken. NERC has not properly consulted on whether a merger is the best way to achieve its objectives for marine and polar science. It has not provided an adequate evidence base to support its case for a merger, with the absence of projected cost savings being particularly notable. In addition, NERC does not appear to have given adequate consideration to the British Antarctic Survey's geopolitical role when drafting its consultation proposals. Nor has it demonstrated an awareness of UK political commitments on protecting the environment, and polar regions in particular.
We recognise that NERC is facing a number of financial challenges. However, it has not made the case that merging the British Antarctic Survey and National Oceanography Centre would help meet these challenges. NERC should consider whether its aims could be achieved by means other than a merger. Future consultations should be carried out with better engagement with scientists and other stakeholders.
|
