Written Questions: Government Responses

Ms Harman: To ask the Secretary of State for Education pursuant to question 177099 tabled on 20 November 2013 for answer on 25 November 2013, when he plans to answer that question. [180698]

Elizabeth Truss: I have answered the hon. Member's question today.

18 Dec 2013 : Column 687W

Justice

Contempt of Court

John Hemming: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people were received into custody for contempt of court in each month since January 2012. [180224]

Jeremy Wright: The following tables set out the number of people who were received into custody for contempt of court between January 2012 and June 2013 (the latest available figures). Contempt of court covers a wide variety of conduct which undermines or has the potential to undermine the course of justice. I welcome the Law Commission's report on contempt and look forward to discussing its recommendations.

Month in 2012Number of people received into custody for contempt of court

January

11

February

12

March

7

April

7

May

12

June

7

July

12

August

13

September

14

October

10

November

16

December

10

18 Dec 2013 : Column 688W

Month in 2013Number of people received into custody for contempt of court

January

8

February

8

March

10

April

15

May

11

June

8

Driving Offences

David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people in each region were convicted of (a) a motoring offence that resulted in a fatality and (b) careless driving in 2012. [171917]

Jeremy Wright: The UK has one of the best road safety records in the world, but more can be done to prevent deaths and serious injuries. By improving the skills and attitudes of drivers and riders, providing better safety education and actively enforcing existing laws we are working to reduce the number of serious road traffic collisions and the appalling impact they can have on victims and their families.

The total number of defendants found guilty of causing death by driving and careless driving, by region, in England and Wales, in 2012, can be viewed in the following table.

Defendants found guilty of (a) a motoring offence that resulted in a fatality and (b) careless driving in England and Wales 20121,2
 Region
OffencesEastEast MidlandsLondonNorth EastNorth WestSouth EastSouth WestWalesWest MidlandsYorkshire and HumbersideEngland and Wales

Motoring offence that resulted in a fatality

38

43

34

14

62

45

32

29

40

40

377

Of which:

           

Causing Death by Dangerous Driving3

11

12

14

4

21

7

12

9

12

14

116

Causing Death by Careless Driving when under the influence of Drink or Drugs4

1

3

1

0

6

5

1

3

1

2

23

Causing Death by careless or inconsiderate driving5

24

27

16

8

33

32

19

15

24

23

221

Causing death by driving unlicensed, disqualified or uninsured drivers6

0

1

2

2

1

1

0

2

3

1

13

Causing Death by Aggravated Vehicle Taking7

2

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

4

            

Careless Driving

           

Careless Driving—Without due care and attention or reasonable consideration for other road users8

1,893

1,068

2,165

475

1,110

1,413

1,156

593

1,512

1,179

12,564

18 Dec 2013 : Column 689W

18 Dec 2013 : Column 690W

1 The figures given in the table on court proceedings relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. 2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. 3 An offence under S.1 Road Traffic Act 1988 as amended by Road Traffic Act 1991 and Criminal Justice Act 2003 4 An offence under S.3A Road Traffic Act 1988added by Road Traffic Act 1991 and amended by Criminal Justice Act 2003 5 An offence under S.2B Road Traffic Act 1988added by Road Safety Act 2006 6 An offence under S.3ZB Road Traffic Act 1988added by Road Safety Act 2006 7 An offence under S. 12A(2)(a) [dangerous driving] or 12 A(2)(b) [injury/death] Theft Act 1968 8 An offence under S.3 Road Traffic Act 1988 Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice

Family Proceedings

John Hemming: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice which foreign Governments have complained to the UK (a) before 2013 and (b) in 2013 about the treatment of their citizens in family court proceedings. [179792]

Mr Vara: This information is not collected centrally. I refer the hon. Member to the reply he received from my hon. Friend the Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Mr Timpson) on 30 January 2013, Official Report, column 813W.

Knives: Crime

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) pursuant to the answer of 1 July 2013, Official Report, column 480W, on knife crime, what the length was of each of the eight immediate custodial sentences contained in Table 8 of the Knife Possession Sentencing Quarterly Brief for the first quarter of 2013 which were handed down for the offence of threatening with a knife; [166328]

(2) which of the defendants in each sentencing category referred to in Table 8 of the Knife Possession Sentencing Quarterly Brief for the first quarter of 2013 (a) had a previous knife-related conviction, (b) had a previous violence-related conviction, (c) had any other previous conviction and (d) were sentenced for more than one offence at the same time as the offence of threatening with a knife. [166329]

Jeremy Wright: I understand that you have now received a response to your parliamentary question and I apologise for the delay.

Oakwood Prison

Ian Lucas: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice when he took the decision to have HMP Oakwood run by a private sector business. [170958]

Jeremy Wright: The right hon. Member for Blackburn (Mr Straw), who was Secretary of State for Justice in the Labour Government at the time, announced on 27 April 2009 the Government's intention to compete the operation of four existing prisons and one new build (HMP Oakwood). My right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Rushcliffe (Mr Clarke), my predecessor as Secretary of State for Justice in the coalition Government, announced on 31 March 2011 the outcome of the competition for HMP Oakwood.

Sadiq Khan: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many sex offenders are held at HMP Oakwood; and how many places on sex offender treatment programmes are available at that prison. [179774]

Jeremy Wright: As of 30 September 2013 there were 299 prisoners held at HMP Oakwood with an index offence of a sexual nature. The prison acts as a treatment support site for HMP Stafford. As a consequence Oakwood have recently increased the number of staff trained in completing appropriate sex offender assessments and is planning to have all offender supervisors appropriately trained. Oakwood have run sex offender only Thinking Skills Programmes to meet identified needs.

Sadiq Khan: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what the (a) agreed and (b) actual staffing levels have been at HMP Oakwood in each month since that prison opened; [180654]

(2) how many prison officer equivalent staff work on the wings at HMP Oakwood; and how many such staff are accredited and fully trained; [180660]

(3) how many staff at HMP Oakwood had no previous service in the prisons system when they went to work at HMP Oakwood; [180670]

(4) how many occasions prisoners have been (a) denied access to visits or (b) locked in their cells because of staffing shortages at HMP Oakwood since that prison opened. [180671]

Jeremy Wright: The information requested could not be obtained within the time scale. I will write to the right hon. Member in due course.

Sadiq Khan: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many staff at HMP Oakwood have less than one year's service. [180659]

Jeremy Wright: Staff working at HMP Oakwood are employed by a number of providers, to deliver a range of services. These include, for example, probation services, education and health care, as well as custodial services.

While G4S, the main provider, is not able to provide information covering staff employed by all these providers, within the last 12 months 385 people have been cleared to work at the prison. Most of these are employees of the various providers, but the figure also includes volunteers, such as Independent Monitoring Board members and lay visitors.

18 Dec 2013 : Column 691W

Prisoners: Suicide

Sadiq Khan: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many incidences of (a) suicide, (b) attempted suicide and (c) self-harm there were in (i) HMP Oakwood and (ii) on average in all adult prisons in each of the last three years. [179775]

Jeremy Wright: We are committed to open and transparent reporting of data relating to self-harm incidents and deaths in custody. It remains a priority to reduce the number of deaths and violence in prisons.

Statistics on the number of (a) self-inflicted deaths and (c) self-harm incidents for each prison establishment are published on an annual basis in the Safety in Custody statistics bulletin, published at:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/safety-in-custody-statistics

Statistics on self-inflicted deaths by establishment can be found in Table 1.16 in the annual tables which accompany each publication, and the number of self-harm incidents in table 2.13.

Figures for the rate of self-inflicted deaths and self-harm incidents in prison custody are given in tables 1.1 and 2.1 of the same bulletin. An attempted suicide will be recorded as a self- harm incident.

Prisons: Crimes of Violence

Jenny Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many assaults were committed against prisoners in each prison in England and Wales in each year since 2010. [178798]

Jeremy Wright: The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) and the Prison Officers Association (POA) are jointly committed to a zero tolerance approach to assaults on staff, visitors and prisoners.

NOMS takes the issue of assaults in prisons very seriously. It currently has systems in place to deal with perpetrators quickly and robustly, with serious incidents referred to the police for prosecution.

NOMS is committed to exploring options to continue to improve how violence is tackled in prisons to keep both staff and prisoners safe. It is currently looking at the policy and practice of the management of violence.

The number of prisoner-on-prisoner assaults, including fights, in each prison in England and Wales in each year is provided in Table 1. Statistics on assaults in prison custody are published at a national level on a quarterly basis and annually for prison establishments and are published at:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/safety-in-custody-statistics

Table 1: Number of prisoner-on-prisoner assaults, England and Wales
 Year
Prison201020112012

Altcourse

265

282

261

Ashfield

453

934

533

Ashwell

9

0

0

Askham Grange

1

0

0

Aylesbury

200

127

102

Bedford

80

72

83

18 Dec 2013 : Column 692W

Belmarsh

39

45

45

Birmingham

93

132

143

Blantyre House

0

0

1

Blundeston

36

13

17

Brinsford

37

229

273

Bristol

65

86

67

Brixton

95

100

57

Bronzefield

70

128

81

Buckley Hall

37

18

31

Bullingdon

91

51

39

Bullwood Hall

17

19

21

Bure

14

16

24

Canterbury

30

24

22

Cardiff

17

14

13

Channings Wood

54

65

35

Chelmsford

165

222

137

Coldingley

17

24

31

Cookham Wood

124

55

152

Dartmoor

20

20

19

Deerbolt

238

205

163

Doncaster

141

228

351

Dorchester

30

38

34

Dovegate

116

80

103

Dover

27

27

24

Downview

16

31

26

Drake Hall

22

13

31

Durham

125

136

82

Eastwood Park

20

23

21

Edmunds Hill

40

11

0

Erlestoke

28

23

30

Everthorpe

62

50

48

Exeter

65

111

94

Featherstone

57

63

81

Feltham

658

702

590

Ford

6

5

6

Forest Bank

202

260

262

Foston Hall

9

2

4

Frankland

52

55

39

Full Sutton

49

31

24

Garth

54

69

67

Gartree

14

9

8

Glen Parva

355

319

354

Gloucester

43

38

36

Grendon/Spring Hill

0

1

0

Grendon/Spring Hill: Grendon

3

1

2

Grendon/Spring Hill: Spring Hill

2

1

2

Guys Marsh

48

50

55

Haslar

4

5

9

Hatfield

0

0

2

Haverigg

58

79

88

Hewell

140

157

166

High Down

101

186

205

Highpoint

67

129

174

Hindley

238

299

287

Hollesley Bay

0

4

1

18 Dec 2013 : Column 693W

Holloway

26

40

43

Holme House

106

111

89

Hull

93

91

92

Huntercombe

86

4

21

IOW: Albany

20

20

25

IOW: Camp Hill

53

38

45

IOW: Parkhurst

30

25

35

Isis

10

162

198

Kennet

22

16

14

Kingston

3

1

1

Kirkham

0

0

4

Kirklevington

2

1

0

Lancaster Castle

6

1

Lancaster Farms

225

277

173

Leeds

72

77

127

Leicester

41

72

73

Lewes

64

86

90

Leyhill

3

1

0

Lincoln

66

125

125

Lindholme

35

49

74

Littlehey

80

170

170

Liverpool

191

160

137

Long Lartin

37

30

24

Low Newton

44

47

42

Lowdham Grange

49

82

100

Maidstone

11

7

12

Manchester

140

116

116

Moorland

82

28

30

Moorland Open

2

0

0

Morton Hall

14

11

37

Mount

44

52

39

New Hall

23

12

1

North Sea Camp

8

11

6

Northallerton

95

58

23

Northumberland

99

Northumberland: Acklington

79

98

21

Northumberland: Castington

146

30

14

Norwich

58

66

108

Nottingham

71

108

85

Oakwood

29

Onley

119

111

70

Parc

339

338

256

Pentonville

206

231

186

Peterborough

258

249

180

Portland

131

135

121

Preston

100

140

107

Ranby

68

79

94

Reading

32

22

24

Risley

63

70

57

Rochester

216

183

118

Rye Hill

35

65

60

Send

11

15

12

18 Dec 2013 : Column 694W

Sheppey: Elmley

91

115

108

Sheppey: Standford Hill

9

3

0

Sheppey: Swaleside

50

76

47

Shepton Mallet

1

3

3

Shrewsbury

17

22

24

Stafford

69

74

43

Stocken

62

40

65

Stoke Heath

410

138

108

Styal

32

29

24

Sudbury

0

0

2

Swansea

23

32

16

Swinfen Hall

89

168

191

Thameside

107

Thorn Cross

16

22

13

Usk\Prescoed

9

3

0

Verne

13

27

22

Wakefield

34

25

31

Wandsworth

67

72

52

Warren Hill

273

174

231

Wayland

68

97

116

Wealstun

46

52

55

Wellingborough

78

85

56

Werrington

148

165

192

Wetherby

433

507

439

Whatton

10

8

11

Whitemoor

32

36

17

Winchester

43

56

45

Wolds

31

40

39

Woodhill

76

90

110

Wormwood Scrubs

137

77

96

Wymott

39

37

50

Escort Areas

4

5

8

Total

11,244

12,316

11,584

Nicholas Soames: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many assaults on (a) prisoners and (b) prison staff there were (i) in HMP Lewes and (ii) on average in all adult prisons in each of the last three years. [180475]

Jeremy Wright: The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) and the Prison Officers Association (POA) are jointly committed to a zero tolerance approach to assaults on staff, visitors and prisoners.

NOMS takes the issue of assaults in prisons very seriously. It currently has systems in place to deal with perpetrators quickly and robustly, with serious incidents referred to the police for prosecution.

NOMS is committed to exploring options to continue to improve how violence is tackled in prisons to keep both staff and prisoners safe. It is currently looking at the policy and practice of the management of violence.

There are a number of factors that affect the number of assault incidents at any individual establishment. These include, but are not restricted to, the size of the population held at the prison, the type and role of the prison and the gender of the prisoners accommodated.

18 Dec 2013 : Column 695W

For example, younger, male prisoners are more likely to be involved in an assault than other prisoners. Differences in population size of establishments mean it would not necessarily be correct to conclude that a prison with a higher number of incidents than the average is a less safe prison; nor that a prison with a lower number of incidents than the average is a safer prison.

Statistics on the number of assaults on staff for each prison establishment are published on an annual basis in the Safety in Custody statistics bulletin, published at:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/safety-in-custody-statistics

They can be found in Table 3.15 of the annual tables accompanying each quarterly release.

Prisons: Drugs

Paul Flynn: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many and what proportion of jails are free of illegal drug use. [180268]

Jeremy Wright: Prisons have achieved considerable success in reducing the level of drug misuse against a background of a continuing high demand for drugs. Drug misuse as measured by random mandatory drug testing (MDT) has fallen 17.4 percentage points over the past 16 years despite the fact that more drugs are being tested for.

MDT, which runs to standardised procedures across prisons, has three main aims, one of which is to supply detailed information on patterns of drugs-misuse in prisons and is used by the National Offender Management Service to measure the level of drug misuse in prisons.

A single episode of drug misuse over a defined period, strictly interpreted, would deprive a prison of drug free status. Prisons can perform very well in keeping drugs out of prison but technically not be drug free.

Over the 2012-13 financial year, three prisons in England and Wales reported no drug misuse as measured by random MDT. 96 prisons in England and Wales reported no drug misuse, as measured by random MDT, in at least one month of the 2012-13 financial year.

The data in this answer have been drawn from live administrative data systems which may be amended at any time. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. The data are not subject to audit.

Probation

Mr Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what assessment he has made of the risks posed to the Transforming Rehabilitation Probation programme by (a) insufficient and (b) delayed guidance from his Department; [180272]

(2) what assessment he has made of the risk posed to the Transforming Rehabilitation Probation programme

18 Dec 2013 : Column 696W

of a failure of the programme to be delivered either in scope or within the timescale set by Ministers; [180274]

(3) what assessment he has made of the risks posed to the Transforming Rehabilitation Probation programme of insufficient Ministry of Justice capacity to manage the process due to its scale and a lack of coordination between different Ministry of Justice work streams; [180275]

(4) what assessment he has made of the risks posed to the Transforming Rehabilitation Probation programme of insufficient attention and support from his Department due to other demands; [180291]

(5) what assessment he has made of the risks posed to the Transforming Rehabilitation Probation programme by the scale and speed of the programme making it unachievable or achievable only superficially; [180292]

(6) what assessment he has made of the risks posed to the Transforming Rehabilitation Probation programme of a failure of poorly designed operational processes; [180293]

(7) what assessment he has made of the risks posed to the Transforming Rehabilitation Probation programme of a failure of poor engagement with trusts and failure to take on board their views; [180294]

(8) what assessment he has made of the risks posed to the Transforming Rehabilitation Probation programme of insufficient testing of operational design; [180295]

(9) what assessment he has made of the risks posed to the Transforming Rehabilitation Probation programme of a failure due to a lack of resources and preparation. [180296]

Jeremy Wright: We are introducing radical reforms to the way offenders are rehabilitated, to finally tackle our stubbornly high reoffending rates that currently see almost half of all prisoners commit further crime within a year of release. Nevertheless, the Department is overseeing the reforms in a careful way which ensures public safety remains our top priority. We have developed the design of the new system through consultation and engagement, and we have taken on board the experience from the payment by results pilot programmes across government to ensure lessons learned are being applied.

We are delivering reform at pace, nevertheless we are also testing the design of the new system rigorously to ensure the changes are introduced safely and effectively.

Mr Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the cost per annum to the Probation Service in England and Wales is of supervising a person on licence for (a) 12 months, (b) 24 months and (c) 36 months. [180273]

Jeremy Wright: Probation unit costs are published on an annual basis by the Ministry of Justice at the following page of the Gov.uk website:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prison-and-probation-trusts-performance-statistics-201213