1 Apr 2014 : Column 549W

Written Answers to Questions

Tuesday 1 April 2014

Cabinet Office

Electoral Register

Chris Ruane: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office pursuant to the answer of 25 November 2013, Official Report, columns 80-1W, on Electoral Register, if his Department will use information gathered on the amount spent by local authorities on voter registration to inform policy on registration levels. [193857]

Greg Clark: The Government do not hold information on the amounts spent by local authorities on electoral registration.

Employment: Brigg

Andrew Percy: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many disabled people were in paid work in Brigg and Goole constituency in each of the last five years. [194258]

Mr Hurd: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Joe Grice, dated March 2014:

On behalf of the Director General for the Office for National Statistics (ONS), I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many disabled people were in paid work in Brigg and Goole constituency in each of the last five years. (194258)

The ONS compiles employment statistics for local areas from the Annual Population Survey (APS) following International Labour Organisation (ILO) definitions. However, estimates of the number of disabled people in employment in Brigg and Goole constituency are not available due to small sample sizes.

National and local area estimates for many labour market statistics, including employment, unemployment and claimant count are available on the NOMIS website at

http://www.nomisweb.co.uk

Older People

Mr Gregory Campbell: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what estimate the Government have made of the likely change in the number of people in the UK who will be aged 90 years and over between 2012 and 2023. [194120]

Mr Hurd: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Caron Walker, dated March 2014:

On behalf of the Director General for the Office for National Statistics I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking the Minister for the Cabinet Office what estimate

1 Apr 2014 : Column 550W

the Government has made of the likely change in the number of people in the UK who will be aged 90 years and over between 2012 and 2023. [194120]

Estimates of future population are available as population projections. The most recent national population projections are based on mid-year population estimates for 2012 published in 2013. They project the number of persons aged 90 and over in the United Kingdom to increase by 311,000, from 513,000 in mid-2012 to 824,000 by mid 2023.

National population projections are not forecasts and do not attempt to predict the impact of future government policies, changing economic circumstances or the capacity of an area to accommodate a change in population. They provide an indication of the future size and age structure of the population if recent demographic trends continued.

Rents: Greater London

Fiona Mactaggart: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office if he will request that the Office for National Statistics publishes the evidential basis for the comment by the Minister for Housing of 3 March 2014, Official Report, column 606, on changes in rents in London. [194170]

Mr Hurd: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have the asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Joe Grice, dated March 2014:

On behalf of the Director General for the Office for National Statistics (ONS), I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question asking the Minister for the Cabinet Office if the ONS will publish the evidential basis for the comment by the Minister for Housing of 3 March 2014, Official Report, column 606, on changes in rents in London (194170).

ONS publishes the experimental Index of Private Housing Rental Prices (IPHRP), which tracks the changes in the price charged for renting private housing. The IPHRP excludes properties rented by housing associations and local authorities, and any other forms of social housing. The IPHRP measures the change in the price of renting residential property from private landlords, thereby allowing a comparison between the prices tenants are charged in the current month compared with the same month in the previous year. The index does not measure the change in advertised rental prices.

The available information is provided in the table for the period January 2011 to December 2013.

Experimental index of private housing rental prices, percentage change over 12 months
Not seasonally adjusted
   Countries
  Great BritainEnglandWalesScotland

Percentage change on a year earlier

    

2011

Jan

0.3

0.3

 

Feb

0.4

0.3

 

Mar

0.5

0.4

 

Apr

0.6

0.4

 

May

0.8

0.5

 

Jun

0.9

0.5

 

Jul

1.0

0.7

 

Aug

1.1

0.6

 

Sep

1.2

0.6

 

Oct

1.2

0.7

 

Nov

1.3

0.8

1 Apr 2014 : Column 551W

 

Dec

1.3

0.8

      

2012

Jan

1.4

1.4

0.7

1.3

 

Feb

1.4

1.4

0.8

1.3

 

Mar

1.4

1.4

0.7

1.2

 

Apr

1.4

1.5

0.8

1.2

 

May

1.4

1.5

0.7

1.2

 

Jun

1.4

1.5

0.8

1.1

 

Jul

1.4

1.5

0.6

1.0

 

Aug

1.4

1.5

0.7

0.8

 

Sep

1.4

1.5

0.8

0.5

 

Oct

1.4

1.5

0.8

0.4

 

Nov

1.4

1.5

0.7

0.3

 

Dec

1.4

1.5

0.8

0.4

1 Apr 2014 : Column 552W

      

2013

Jan

1.4

1.5

1.0

0.4

 

Feb

1.4

1.4

1.1

0.5

 

Mar

1.3

1.4

1.2

0.6

 

Apr

1.3

1.3

1.4

0.8

 

May

1.3

1.3

1.5

1.0

 

Jun

1.2

1.2

1.5

1.2

 

Jul

1.2

1.2

1.4

1.2

 

Aug

1.2

1.1

1.3

1.3

 

Sep

1.2

1.1

1.2

1.4

 

Oct

1.1

1.1

1.2

1.4

 

Nov

1.1

1.0

1.2

1.3

 

Dec

1.0

1.0

1.2

1.3

Not seasonally adjusted
  Regions  
  North EastNorth WestYorkshire and the HumberEast MidlandsWest MidlandsEastLondonSouth EastSouth WestGB1England1

Percentage change on a year earlier

           

2011

Jan

0.1

0.4

0.4

-0.1

0.3

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.1

0.3

 

Feb

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.0

0.3

0.2

0.5

0.5

0.2

0.3

 

Mar

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.1

0.3

0.3

0.6

0.6

0.3

0.4

 

Apr

0.3

0.5

0.5

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.8

0.7

0.4

0.5

 

May

0.4

0.6

0.5

0.3

0.5

0.6

1.0

0.9

0.5

0.6

 

Jun

0.4

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.6

0.6

1.2

1.1

0.6

0.7

 

Jul

0.4

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.6

0.7

1.5

1.1

0.7

0.8

 

Aug

0.4

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.7

0.8

1.7

1.1

0.8

0.8

 

Sep

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.8

1.8

1.2

0.7

0.8

 

Oct

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.9

1.9

1.3

0.8

0.9

 

Nov

0.4

0.7

0.5

0.7

0.7

1.0

2.0

1.4

0.9

0.9

 

Dec

0.3

0.7

0.6

0.7

0.7

1.0

2.1

1.4

0.9

0.9

             

2012

Jan

0.3

0.8

0.7

0.7

0.7

1.0

2.2

1.5

0.9

1.0

1.0

 

Feb

0.2

0.8

0.6

0.8

0.7

1.1

2.2

1.5

0.9

1.0

1.0

 

Mar

0.2

0.8

0.7

0.8

0.8

1.1

2.3

1.5

0.9

1.0

1.0

 

Apr

0.1

0.7

0.7

0.8

0.8

1.1

2.3

1.5

0.9

1.0

1.0

 

May

0.1

0.7

0.6

0.8

0.7

1.0

2.4

1.4

0.9

1.0

1.0

 

Jun

0.1

0.7

0.6

0.8

0.8

1.0

2.4

1.4

0.9

1.0

0.9

 

Jul

0.0

0.7

0.6

0.7

0.8

1.1

2.4

1.4

0.9

0.9

0.9

 

Aug

0.0

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

1.1

2.4

1.4

0.8

0.9

0.9

 

Sep

-0.1

0.6

0.6

0.8

0.7

1.0

2.4

1.4

0.9

0.9

0.9

 

Oct

-0.1

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.7

1.0

2.5

1.4

0.9

0.9

0.9

 

Nov

-0.1

0.5

0.7

0.8

0.7

1.0

2.5

1.3

0.9

0.8

0.9

 

Dec

-0.1

0.5

0.7

0.8

0.6

1.0

2.5

1.4

0.9

0.9

0.9

             

2013

Jan

-0.1

0.5

0.7

0.7

0.6

1.0

2.5

1.3

0.9

0.8

0.9

 

Feb

-0.1

0.5

0.7

0.7

0.6

0.9

2.4

1.3

0.9

0.8

0.8

 

Mar

-0.1

0.5

0.7

0.7

0.6

0.9

2.3

1.3

0.9

0.8

0.8

1 Apr 2014 : Column 553W

1 Apr 2014 : Column 554W

 

Apr

-0.1

0.4

0.7

0.7

0.6

0.9

2.3

1.2

0.9

0.8

0.8

 

May

-0.1

0.4

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.8

2.2

1.2

0.9

0.8

0.8

 

Jun

0.0

0.4

0.6

0.6

0.5

0.8

2.1

1.1

0.9

0.8

0.8

 

Jul

0.1

0.4

0.6

0.6

0.5

0.7

1.9

1.1

0.9

0.8

0.7

 

Aug

0.1

0.3

0.6

0.6

0.5

0.8

1.9

1.1

0.9

0.8

0.7

 

Sep

0.1

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.8

1.8

1.1

1.0

0.8

0.7

 

Oct

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.8

1.7

1.1

0.9

0.8

0.7

 

Nov

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.7

1.6

1.1

0.9

0.8

0.7

 

Dec

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.4

0.7

1.6

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

1 Excluding London Source: Office for National Statistics.

Communities and Local Government

Housing: Carbon Emissions

Cathy Jamieson: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when he will publish the Government’s response to the consultation on their commitment to implement zero carbon homes by 2016. [193636]

Stephen Williams: The Government are currently considering the responses to the consultation on “Next steps to zero carbon homes—Allowable Solutions” and will publish their response shortly.

Land: Contamination

Joan Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 28 January 2014, Official Report, column 476W, on land: contamination, what proportion of the revenue support grant arises from a calculation of the cost to local authorities of fulfilling their duties under part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. [193553]

Brandon Lewis: Revenue support grant is not ring-fenced. It is an unhypothecated block grant and it is therefore not possible to break it down for any particular category of funding. From April 2013, the new business rates retention scheme also allows local authorities to retain a portion of business rates collected.

Deputy Prime Minister

Constituencies

Chris Ruane: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 12 June 2012, Official Report, column 444W, on constituencies, what comparative assessment he has made of the accuracy of the (a) electoral register and (b) census. [193801]

Greg Clark: Using population figures derived from census data would not provide a better basis for a review of constituency boundaries than using the electoral register. The electoral register is updated annually, whereas the census takes place every ten years; in addition, census figures will include persons who are not eligible to register to vote, for example on grounds of citizenship or age.

Devolution and Decentralisation

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister What recent discussions he has had with ministerial colleagues about the Government’s policy on devolution and decentralisation. [193672]

The Deputy Prime Minister: I meet regularly with ministerial colleagues to discuss this Government's policy of decentralising responsibility to the most appropriate levels.

Electoral Register

Chris Ruane: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 24 January 2013, Official Report, column 392W, on the electoral register if he will place in the Library a copy of the guidelines for the issuing of fixed penalty notices for non-registration. [193800]

Greg Clark: Guidance from the Electoral Commission on the use of civil penalties for failure to respond to a notice of requirement to register was published in September 2013.

I have placed a copy in the Library of the House.

Chris Ruane: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 27 January 2014, Official Report, column 386W, on the electoral register, what is the (a) earliest and (b) latest age a person is allocated their national insurance number; and what the earliest date is that an attainer can be registered to vote. [193836]

Greg Clark: National insurance numbers are sent automatically when individuals reach the age of 15 years and 9 months. There is no upper age limit to apply for a national insurance number.

The law provides that an attainer will be included on the register if they will reach the age of 18 before the end of a 12-month period starting from the next 1 December after the application is made.

1 Apr 2014 : Column 555W

Chris Ruane: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 28 January 2014, Official Report, columns 509-10W, on the electoral register, with which national organisations his Department is working to encourage people to register to vote. [193837]

Greg Clark: Five national organisations have received funding as part of the Government's measures to maximise voter registration.

The Government are working with a number of other groups such as the British Youth Council and Operation Black Vote.

Chris Ruane: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 20 May 2013, Official Report, column 443W, on electoral register, what progress he has made with private sector credit reference agencies on ensuring the completeness and accuracy of the electoral register. [193919]

Greg Clark: The Government are using public data to confirm the vast majority of electors on the register when the transition to individual electoral registration takes place this year.

There are no plans to use private sector credit reference agency data.

Electoral Register: Fraud

Chris Ruane: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister with reference to the answer of 3 September 2012, Official Report, columns 93-4W, on electoral register: fraud, what assessment he has made of the reasons there have been no successful prosecutions for postal vote fraud since 2011. [193880]

Greg Clark: The Government have made no such assessment.

Chris Ruane: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister with reference to the answer of 19 June 2012, Official Report, columns 923-24W, on electoral register: fraud, how many successful prosecutions for electoral registration fraud there were in (a) 2012, (b) 2013 and (c) 2014 to date. [194030]

Greg Clark: The Government do not collect this data.

Electoral Register: Northern Ireland

Chris Ruane: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 22 January 2014, Official Report, column 189W, on the electoral register: Northern Ireland, if he will discuss the lessons from the registration for schools programme in Northern Ireland with the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. [193838]

Greg Clark: I have discussed the Northern Ireland schools initiative with the Minister of State, Northern Ireland Office, my right hon. Friend the Member for South Leicestershire (Mr Robathan).

1 Apr 2014 : Column 556W

Electoral Register: Young People

Chris Ruane: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 28 January 2014, Official Report, column 510W, on the electoral register: young people, how the £4.2 million funding to maximise the rate of voter registration ahead of the transition to individual electoral registration has been spent; and what measures are in place to monitor the effectiveness of this spending. [193839]

Greg Clark: Funding has been provided to all 363 local authorities and valuation joint boards in Great Britain, and five national organisations, to support the cost of activities for maximising registration as part of the transition to individual electoral registration.

Guidance has been made available to support them in evaluating the success of activity delivered through this funding. Government officials will continue to work closely with funding recipients to monitor and measure the outcomes.

Health

NHS: Working Hours

16. Charlotte Leslie: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress has been made by the taskforce reviewing the effects of the Working Time Directive on the NHS. [903434]

Dr Poulter: There are significant clinical concerns about the effect that the European working time directive has on continuity of care for patients and the quality of training for doctors. Therefore we have set up an independent taskforce chaired by Norman Williams, president of the Royal College of Surgeons. The taskforce will report shortly.

NHS

19. David Tredinnick: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps he has taken to improve patient choice in the NHS. [903438]

Norman Lamb: We are committed to patients having greater choice and control over their health care. Today, we will bring parity to patient's choice of provider in mental and physical health, and in October this year, we will enable patients to register with GP practices out-of-area, and introduce legal rights to have personal health budgets.

General Practitioners: Rural Areas

22. Tim Farron: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if his Department will provide support for small rural GP surgeries additional to that provided through the new GP surgery funding formula. [903442]

Dr Poulter: The Department recognises that the withdrawal of the minimum practice income guarantee (MPIG) for general practices has raised concerns about the viability of some small practices. That is why we are taking the next seven years to implement the change to MPIG funding fully. Phasing the changes over this period will allow the minority of practices that lose funding to adjust gradually to the reduction in payments.

1 Apr 2014 : Column 557W

NHS England area teams are working with the small number of practices which are particularly affected. They are considering whether different arrangements are needed to ensure there are appropriate primary medical services for local populations.

Abortion

Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what evidence his Department has assessed on whether giving birth to a baby of a particular gender constitutes a greater risk to the mother’s physical or mental health than termination of the pregnancy; [193284]

(2) what steps he is taking to ensure that the British Pregnancy Advisory Service is not undertaking abortions based on gender. [193312]

Jane Ellison: Abortion on the grounds of gender alone is illegal. The 1967 Abortion Act states that two practitioners have to be

“of the opinion, formed in good faith”

that the woman has grounds for an abortion according to the criteria set out in that Act.

The Department has made this position clear to all providers, including the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, and will do so again in the forthcoming further guidance.

Mr Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Congleton of 25 February 2014, Official Report, column 156W, on sex-selective abortion, if he will ensure that the Government’s forthcoming guidance on compliance with the Abortion Act 1967 addresses the question of whether or not it is necessary for registered medical practitioners to see a woman in order to form an opinion in good faith that the continuance of the pregnancy would adversely affect her mental or physical health; and if he will make a statement. [193295]

Jane Ellison: The purpose of the guidance is to clarify for medical practitioners what is required of them when making a decision under the Abortion Act. This guidance is currently in development and will be published in due course.

Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the impartiality of abortion counselling advice provided by Marie Stopes and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service. [193314]

Jane Ellison: Guidance on the provision of non-judgmental counselling was included in the Government’s Framework for Sexual Health Improvement published in March 2013.

Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many abortion notification HSA4 forms have been referred to (a) to the General Medical Council and (b) the police following scrutiny by his Department since 2006. [193618]

Jane Ellison: There have been no referrals to the General Medical Council nor to the police in relation to HSA4 forms submitted to the chief medical officer.

1 Apr 2014 : Column 558W

Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Congleton of 20 March 2014, Official Report, column 722W, on abortion, on how many occasions departmental medical practitioners have requested further details from a patient's medical records via the doctor approving termination in each of the last five years for which records are available. [193683]

Jane Ellison: This information is not recorded.

Air Pollution: Death

Luciana Berger: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate his Department has made of the number of deaths attributable to long-term exposure to particularate air pollution in each of the last five years. [194102]

Jane Ellison: In 2010, the Department of Health's expert advisory committee on the medical effects of air pollutants published an estimate of the mortality effect in 2008 of long-term exposure to particulate air pollution arising from human activities. The mortality burden for the United Kingdom was estimated as an effect equivalent to nearly 29,000 deaths.

Estimates of the fraction of mortality in English local authority areas in 2010 and 2011 attributable to long-term exposure to particulate air pollution arising from human activities are published by Public Health England as one of the indicators in the Department's Public Health Outcomes Framework. For England as a whole, this figure is approximately 5.5%.

All-Party Groups

Chris Ruane: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what his Department’s policy is on allowing officials to appear before all-party parliamentary groups. [193559]

Dr Poulter: I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by the Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General, my right hon. Friend the Member for Horsham (Mr Maude), on 26 March 2014, Official Report, column 300W.

Ambulance Services

Andrew George: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) if he will estimate the resource implications of requiring all ambulance trusts to meet category A eight-minute response time in all rural locations; [193611]


(2) what comparative assessment he has made of the performance of ambulance trusts serving predominantly (a) rural and (b) urban areas against the (i) eight-minute and (ii) 19-minute response time targets for category A patients; [193612]


(3) what plans he has to review ambulance response targets for category A and category C call-outs; [193613]


(4) if he will review the (a) response time targets and (b) resources available for ambulance trusts which serve largely or predominantly rural areas; [193614]

1 Apr 2014 : Column 559W


(5) if he will make a comparative assessment of response (a) outcomes and (b) times for category A calls for ambulance trusts in (i) rural and (ii) urban locations. [193615]

Jane Ellison: No comparative assessment has been made of the performance of ambulance trusts serving predominantly (a) rural and (b) urban areas against the (i) eight-minute and (ii) 19-minute response time targets for category A patients because ambulance trusts are not confined to given areas and so can and do work across locations, including across urban and rural areas.

A comparative assessment of response (a) outcomes and (b) times for category A calls for ambulance trusts in (i) rural and (ii) urban locations will not be made because data on ambulance performance are collected at national and trust level and as a result do not distinguish between rural and urban areas. Previous ambulance response time standards based on rural and urban areas were discontinued in the early 2000s, partly due to definitional issues and inconsistency of response.

Work is currently being undertaken collaboratively between the Department and NHS England on how data can possibly be used differently to provide more insight into any variations in performance at a more in-depth level. However, it is important to recognise that ambulance performance data sit within a suite of data, including clinical outcome indicators, collected to provide a richer picture of the delivery of services to patients across the field of urgent and emergency care.

No estimate will be made of the resource implications of requiring all ambulance trusts to meet category A eight-minute response time in all rural locations. Each ambulance trust is required to plan to provide appropriate resources to meet local demand. How a trust organises itself operationally to take into account its particular geography and any related challenges is its responsibility.

NHS England has, however, done an assessment on the resources available for ambulance trusts which serve rural areas. This assessment shows ambulance services use advanced technology to accurately predict where demand is most likely to come from, given past call history. They then station vehicles accordingly. Ambulance trusts also include the incorporation of first responder and co-responder schemes based out in the community to ensure skilled help reaches patients as quickly as

1 Apr 2014 : Column 560W

possible. Longer term, local ambulance trusts are working closely with their local health economies to find innovative ways of managing demand, including more use of telephone triage and appropriate referral to suitable local health providers where that is clinically appropriate.

Ambulance trusts constantly review their operational deployment regimes to attempt to maximise response times to rural areas. NHS England expects ambulance trusts to deal with all emergency calls on the appropriate basis, no matter whether they are from a rural or urban locality.

As commissioners of ambulance services, clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) supported by area teams must work with ambulance trusts directly to address any concerns they may have about performance standards generally and delivery of services to patients. The Department expects CCGs to ensure that the appropriate services are provided to their populations, in both urban and rural areas.

NHS England is currently undertaking a review of urgent and emergency care, which is considering the way the system delivers services, including ambulance services. As part of the review, NHS England is working closely with the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives to see what can be done to improve ambulance performance, including performance in rural areas.

NHS England is focusing on whole system change to the delivery of urgent and emergency care, including new models of care for ambulance services; as a result the clinical and performance standards which underpin this new offer from the ambulance service may be very different to those of the present. Therefore, it does not make sense to make piecemeal changes to the current performance standards before we know the outcome of NHS England's review.

Andrew George: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the response outcomes were for each ambulance trust for category B calls in each of the 10 years for which records are available up to 2011. [193685]

Jane Ellison: The information is shown in the following table, but is not directly comparable between years.

Percentage of category B calls1,2 responded to within 19 minutes by ambulance trust, 2004-05 to 2010-11
Ambulance Trust32004-054 (October to March)2005-062006-075,62007-082008-0972009-102010-118,9

England

87.8

87.3

90.5

91.5

91.0

91.0

91.2

North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust

85.6

85.6

91.2

91.0

87.6

85.9

87.0

Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust

88.4

86.9

91.9

92.4

90.6

91.1

93.7

East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust

78.8

83.4

91.0

94.2

95.0

94.5

88.3

West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust

93.1

91.6

95.6

96.0

95.4

94.1

95.0

East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust

93.5

95.1

94.2

92.7

93.3

94.0

93.1

London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

81.2

75.2

81.2

84.4

84.5

86.4

87.2

1 Apr 2014 : Column 561W

1 Apr 2014 : Column 562W

South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

94.0

94.3

93.8

95.2

94.6

93.4

94.3

South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

92.0

92.0

91.4

91.0

88.0

88.3

91.4

Great Western Ambulance Service NHS Trust

80.4

81.8

83.0

85.7

87.4

90.8

91.7

South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

90.7

89.9

93.4

93.7

94.2

95.8

95.6

Isle of Wight NHS Trust

97.2

98.3

97.9

98.3

96.2

96.7

97.8

1 From 2007-08 urgent calls are included (previous years relate to emergency calls only). 2 Category B; presenting conditions which, though serious, are not immediately life threatening and must receive a response within 19 minutes in 95% of cases. 3 Prior to 2006-07 there were 31 ambulance services: these have been mapped to match the later years for comparability purposes. On 1 October 2007 Staffordshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust merged with West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust. For comparability, data for these two trusts have been merged for all previous years. 4 Up to October 2004 category B was merged with category C, and we are unable to separate the categories prior to this point. 5 For 2006-07 the 14/19 minute response times were dropped with the urban/rural split and replaced with 19 minutes for all trusts. 6 From 2006-07 the number of calls, where following the arrival of a response no ambulance was required, were excluded from the calculation of the response rate within 19 minutes. Data will therefore not be directly comparable with previous years. 7 From 2008-09 the starting point for response time measurement was changed, data relating to 19 minute responses from 2008-09 are not comparable with previous years. 8 Due to changes in the category B 19 minute definitions for 2010-11 these data are not fully comparable with previous years. 9 Category B ceased at the end of 2010-11 and is no longer available. Source: Health and Social Care Information Centre

Cancer

Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress he has made in implementing (a) the National Cancer Survivorship Initiative recommendations and (b) the National Cancer Survivorship Initiative recommendation that services to treat complex problems arising from cancer treatment be commissioned on a national basis; and what assessment he has made of complex problems arising from bone marrow transplant in the context of such treatments. [193649]

Jane Ellison: NHS England is supporting a two-year programme of work in collaboration with Macmillan Cancer Support to develop and implement evidence- based findings from the National Cancer Survivorship Initiative. There are four agreed priorities:

implementation of the four components of the Recovery Package;

promoting the benefits of physical activity as part of treatment and follow-up care;

implementation of risk stratified pathways supported by evidence- based surveillance; and

improved knowledge and management of consequences of treatment.

Improvement in knowledge of the late effects of cancer treatment, including haematological cancers, to inform commissioning of services is one of four priority work areas for the next two years. There are already examples of services being commissioned directly by NHS England to meet complex and rare late effects of cancer treatment. If the emerging evidence indicates the need for additional services which fulfil the criteria for NHS England prescribed services, then this would be the advice provided by the National Cancer Survivorship Initiative to the NHS England Board.

Colorectal Cancer

Mr Baron: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were eligible for and participated in the bowel cancer screening programme in (a) England, (b) each of the five regional programme hubs and (c) each of the 59 regional screening centres in (i) 2009-10, (ii) 2010-11, (iii) 2011-12, and (iv) 2012-13. [194093]

Jane Ellison: The requested information has been provided in the following table.

Number of people who were eligible and participated in the bowel cancer screening programme in England by regional programme hubs and screening centres
Number of people who were eligible and who participated in the bowel cancer screening programme—England
 2009-102010-11
EnglandInvited1Adequately screened2Uptake (%)InvitedAdequately screenedUptake (%)

Total

2,642,091

1,445,596

54.71

3,460,901

1,976,445

57.11

1 Apr 2014 : Column 563W

1 Apr 2014 : Column 564W

Number of people who were eligible and who participated in the bowel cancer screening programme—England
 2011-122012-13
EnglandInvitedAdequately screenedUptake (%)InvitedAdequately screenedUptake (%)

Total

3,623,950

1,996,623

55.10

3,839,325

2,245,471

58.49

Number of people who were eligible and who participated in the bowel cancer screening programme—Programme Hub
 2009-102010-11
HubInvitedAdequately screenedUptake (%)InvitedAdequately screenedUptake (%)

Eastern

578,535

329,403

56.94

696,296

418,378

60.09

London

284,975

125,565

44.06

371,715

167,613

45.09

Midlands and North West

636,800

341,418

53.61

846,664

472,703

55.83

North East

426,920

243,605

57.06

588,772

345,346

58.66

Southern

714,861

405,605

56.74

957,454

572,405

59.78

Total

2,642,091

1,445,596

54.71

3,460,901

1,976,445

57.11

Number of people who were eligible and who participated in the bowel cancer screening programme—Programme Hub
 2011-122012-13
HubInvitedAdequately screenedUptake (%)InvitedAdequately screenedUptake (%)

Eastern

692,416

400,322

57.82

767,696

466,903

60.82

London

405,566

183,249

45.18

404,338

194,613

48.13

Midlands and North West

945,292

506,000

53.53

956,914

543,938

56.84

North East

572,604

323,811

56.55

629,048

375,662

59.72

Southern

1,008,072

583,241

57.86

1,081,329

664,355

61.44

Total

3,623,950

1,996,623

55.10

3,839,325

2,245,471

58.49

Number of people who were eligible and who participated in the bowel cancer screening programme—Screening Centre
 2009-102010-11
CentreInvitedAdequately screenedUptake(%)InvitedAdequately screenedUptake(%)

Bath, Swindon and Wiltshire

43,935

25,225

57.41

49,875

28,957

58.06

Bedfordshire

43,114

22,770

52.81

32,042

18,329

57.20

Berkshire

45,602

23,039

50.52

58,104

33,240

57.21

Bolton

33,504

16,423

49.02

50,710

27,834

54.89

Bradford and Airedale

26,325

15,113

57.41

40,180

22,039

54.85

Bristol and Weston

53,141

28,089

52.86

46,708

26,774

57.32

Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes

22,135

11,929

53.89

43,111

24,354

56.49

Calderdale, Kirklees and Wakefield

57,504

31,093

54.07

58,238

32,538

55.87

Cambridge

35,242

20,847

59.15

54,798

34,248

62.50

Cheshire

40,063

23,943

59.76

46,036

27,421

59.56

Cornwall

22,028

12,532

56.89

43,989

25,937

58.96

County Durham and Darlington

28,720

18,040

62.81

45,137

26,956

59.72

Coventry and Warwickshire

40,873

26,052

63.74

67,309

42,197

62.69

Cumbria and Morecombe

45,530

26,781

58.82

48,609

31,554

64.91

Derbyshire

60,039

35,701

59.46

79,970

47,281

59.12

Dorset

51,710

30,757

59.48

69,849

46,339

66.34

East and North Hertfordshire

31,754

18,093

56.98

31,560

19,115

60.57

East Kent

52,437

28,903

55.12

43,538

24,554

56.40

Gloucestershire

34,162

21,301

62.35

49,866

30,580

61.32

Hampshire

50,942

29,349

57.61

61,712

39,860

64.59

Harrogate

53,091

27,845

52.45

73,168

41,206

56.32

Heart of England

37,091

21,192

57.14

50,641

28,137

55.56

1 Apr 2014 : Column 565W

1 Apr 2014 : Column 566W

Herefordshire and Worcestershire

32,907

19,073

57.96

54,413

32,490

59.71

Hull and East Yorkshire

76,889

46,370

60.31

87,587

53,738

61.35

Kettering and Northamptonshire

97,985

53,466

54.57

100,217

58,643

58.52

Lancashire

82,534

43,869

53.15

96,171

54,932

57.12

Lincolnshire

12,814

7,559

58.99

53,135

32,041

60.30

Merseyside and North Cheshire

87,704

44,280

50.49

133,863

68,333

51.05

NE London

52,176

22,234

42.61

68,539

30,265

44.16

North and East Devon

35,567

20,727

58.28

42,140

25,351

60.16

North Essex

60,800

35,011

57.58

79,933

48,721

60.95

North of Tyne

41,656

23,478

56.36

66,105

40,509

61.28

North Staffordshire

48,874

26,135

53.47

44,133

25,711

58.26

Norwich

70,387

44,597

63.36

92,630

59,033

63.73

Nottinghamshire

52,152

28,741

55.11

51,949

31,721

61.06

Oxfordshire

4,983

2,669

53.56

40,134

22,209

55.34

Pennine

41,379

19,660

47.51

30,645

16,798

54.81

Peterborough and Hinchingbrooke

25,544

14,314

56.04

34,050

19,757

58.02

Sandwell and West Birmingham

47,797

20,750

43.41

48,774

23,035

47.23

Shropshire

18,201

10,474

57.55

31,705

18,492

58.33

Solent and West Sussex

39,940

24,887

62.31

65,131

39,333

60.39

Somerset

35,069

20,463

58.35

44,629

29,324

65.71

South Devon

46,802

29,065

62.10

55,732

34,635

62.15

South East London

59,434

25,028

42.11

63,085

29,943

47.46

South Essex

43,712

23,148

52.96

57,046

32,672

57.27

South of Tyne

37,128

21,175

57.03

49,858

27,629

55.42

South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw

69,071

39,167

56.71

113,509

69,782

61.48

St George's, London

54,759

26,788

48.92

70,723

33,961

48.02

St Marks, London

48,364

22,176

45.85

58,246

26,442

45.40

Surrey

89,702

48,917

54.53

89,750

54,273

60.47

Sussex

44,990

25,080

55.75

76,554

44,413

58.02

Tees

47,141

27,818

59.01

61,822

35,177

56.90

University College London

43,329

19,963

46.07

55,110

25,320

45.94

West Herts

29,045

15,957

54.94

27,383

15,740

57.48

West Kent and Medway

41,712

22,692

54.40

75,238

41,793

55.55

West London

35,637

13,937

39.11

59,580

23,549

39.53

Withington

18,411

8,700

47.25

60,872

29,861

49.06

Wolverhampton

58,554

32,211

55.01

72,653

40,257

55.41

Unknown screening centre3

-

-

-

2,707

1,112

41.08

       

Total

2,642,091

1,445,596

54.71

3,460,901

1,976,445

57.11

Number of people who were eligible and who participated in the bowel cancer screening programme—Screening Centre
 2011-122012-13
CentreInvitedAdequately screenedUptake (%)InvitedAdequately screenedUptake (%)

Bath, Swindon and Wiltshire

52,485

31,037

59.13

58,120

35,215

60.59

Bedfordshire

29,985

15,844

52.84

40,692

23,359

57.40

Berkshire

65,548

33,836

51.62

69,469

40,550

58.37

Bolton

57,381

28,195

49.14

61,898

34,550

55.82

Bradford and Airedale

38,166

20,392

53.43

42,606

24,099

56.56

Bristol and Weston

44,355

23,542

53.08

61,933

36,630

59.14

1 Apr 2014 : Column 567W

1 Apr 2014 : Column 568W

Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes

43,425

24,672

56.82

39,643

23,135

58.36

Calderdale, Kirklees and Wakefield

62,166

35,232

56.67

74,502

42,549

57.11

Cambridge

62,917

36,870

58.60

69,753

42,965

61.60

Cheshire

49,722

28,859

58.04

48,334

29,499

61.03

Cornwall

44,043

26,172

59.42

39,792

24,251

60.94

County Durham and Darlington

41,375

24,508

59.23

45,514

27,836

61.16

Coventry and Warwickshire

68,543

41,124

60.00

69,536

43,692

62.83

Cumbria and Morecombe

62,017

36,875

59.46

57,349

36,901

64.34

Derbyshire

91,530

53,743

58.72

99,373

60,292

60.67

Dorset

77,809

46,501

59.76

81,985

54,367

66.31

East and North Hertfordshire

45,455

25,388

55.85

39,909

24,740

61.99

East Kent

38,383

21,934

57.15

45,823

27,009

58.94

Gloucestershire

48,959

30,106

61.49

55,292

35,314

63.87

Hampshire

75,359

44,023

58.42

76,221

49,053

64.36

Harrogate

60,291

34,524

57.26

67,832

39,734

58.58

Heart of England

48,870

26,697

54.63

64,075

36,248

56.57

Herefordshire and Worcestershire

62,632

37,544

59.94

71,065

43,248

60.86

Hull and East Yorkshire

95,878

56,724

59.16

95,792

59,303

61.91

Kettering and Northamptonshire

78,474

43,402

55.31

124,391

74,720

60.07

Lancashire

117,229

62,737

53.52

111,042

64,294

57.90

Lincolnshire

47,876

28,778

60.11

33,967

20,687

60.90

Merseyside and North Cheshire

136,052

68,233

50.15

136,739

71,998

52.65

NE London

71,822

30,679

42.72

65,560

29,759

45.39

North and East Devon

38,180

23,321

61.08

38,169

23,718

62.14

North Essex

60,975

36,291

59.52

82,279

50,468

61.34

North of Tyne

63,704

35,469

55.68

67,722

41,478

61.25

North Staffordshire

52,068

28,883

55.47

48,282

29,058

60.18

Norwich

92,431

58,603

63.40

95,526

60,393

63.22

Nottinghamshire

50,025

28,675

57.32

55,265

34,409

62.26

Oxfordshire

32,329

18,295

56.59

30,954

17,872

57.74

Pennine

57,044

27,745

48.64

35,854

19,216

53.60

Peterborough and Hinchingbrooke

32,803

19,194

58.51

27,070

15,789

58.33

Sandwell and West Birmingham

62,281

26,925

43.23

63,568

30,366

47.77

Shropshire

33,926

20,176

59.47

32,267

19,463

60.32

Solent and West Sussex

78,381

47,340

60.40

84,676

52,723

62.26

Somerset

51,671

30,145

58.34

51,101

33,168

64.91

South Devon

55,989

34,380

61.40

57,143

35,954

62.92

South East London

73,760

33,088

44.86

69,653

34,747

49.89

South Essex

51,460

26,883

52.24

60,614

35,280

58.20

South of Tyne

49,932

28,239

56.55

57,025

32,587

57.15

South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw

115,653

63,068

54.53

115,165

71,078

61.72

St George's, London

83,180

40,958

49.24

86,436

44,694

51.71

St Marks, London

57,299

27,515

48.02

56,899

27,840

48.93

Surrey

115,466

64,327

55.71

119,185

73,620

61.77

Sussex

76,885

44,315

57.64

80,822

48,517

60.03

Tees

61,855

35,652

57.64

70,494

41,674

59.12

University College London

60,107

27,546

45.83

62,359

30,636

49.13

West Herts

39,556

20,966

53.00

44,227"

26,674

60.31

West Kent and Medway

68,480

39,136

57.15

90,837

53,144

58.50

West London

59,356

23,402

39.43

63,229

26,862

42.48

Withington

60,520

30,604

50.57

67,825

34,363

50.66

1 Apr 2014 : Column 569W

1 Apr 2014 : Column 570W

Wolverhampton

68,833

36,843

53.53

75,551

43,185

57.16

Unknown screening centre3

1,054

468

44.40

921

498

54.07

       

Total

3,623,950

1,996,623

55.10

3,839,325

2,245,471

58.49

1 Routinely invited: Those that are invited to participate in Faecal Occult Blood test (FOBt) screening, as opposed to those that self-refer into the programme. 2 Adequately screened: reaching a definitive FOBt outcome of either ‘Normal' or ‘Abnormal' from potentially multiple FOBt test kits. 3 Patients with a negative FOBt result who have changed their address or GP during the screening process and therefore were never assigned a local screening centre. Source: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes