The Role of School Governing Bodies - Education Committee Contents


1  Introduction

1.  The Government's ambition is "that every school has a high performing governing body that understands its responsibilities and focuses on its core strategic functions; one that is made up of people with relevant skills and experience; and one which operates efficiently and effectively through appropriate structures and procedures".[1]

2.  In September 2012, the Government introduced regulations allowing local authority maintained schools' governing bodies to reconstitute themselves to be smaller, with an emphasis on skills as opposed to set constitutions. On announcing the new regulations, the DfE stressed that "we will not prescribe any particular model [of governance], as local governing bodies are best placed to do this themselves".[2] However, the new regulations continue to prescribe seven— rather than nine as previously—of the posts of the governing body, to include the headteacher, at least two parent governors, one staff governor, one local authority governor, and foundation or partnership governors as appropriate.

3.  The rapid increase in the number of academies has had implications for school governance. Governing bodies of academies must define their own governance procedures subject to approval by the Secretary of State.

4.  Despite some 300,000 individuals serving as school governors, vacancies on governing bodies continue to be an issue. The actual number of vacancies is disputed, although the DfE understands 11% of governor posts to be vacant.[3] Professor Chris James of the University of Bath explained that

the vacancy picture is complex and overall vacancy figures may be misleading. Governing bodies with a high level of vacancies, for example 25%, at the end of one school term may have none at the end of the next because the vacancies had been filled. Nonetheless, 2-3% of schools persistently have high vacancy rates. There is no clear statistical relationship between governing body effectiveness and [...] vacancies.[4]

5.  The National Governors' Association has found that a large proportion of governing bodies have difficulty in finding skilled governors.[5] The National College for School Leadership (NCSL) has also observed that there is "significant evidence" that governors are recruited for their representative role rather than for a particular skill-set.[6]

6.  Vacancies are a particular issue for primary schools, and Ofsted judgments have found primary school governance to be considerably less effective on average than that seen in secondary schools.[7] In her 2010/11 Annual Report, the former Chief Inspector of Ofsted found "considerable variations" in the quality of governance across different types of school. Governance was judged good or outstanding in 53% of pupil referral units, 55% of primary schools, 64% of secondary schools and 71% of special schools.[8]

7.  In September 2012, the Ofsted inspection framework was updated to include a much sharper focus on school governance. Governors are now assessed as to how well they support and challenge school leaders and hold them to account for the quality of teaching and pupils' achievement, behaviour and safety. The framework will also cover the management of finances, including the use of the pupil premium to overcome barriers to learning. Ofsted's evaluation criteria incorporate five core functions for good governance as developed by the National College. The new framework also places a much greater emphasis on tackling underperformance in schools, recommending external reviews of governance where a school both requires improvement and has weak leadership and management. It also allows Ofsted inspectors to recommend that an Interim Executive Board is set up quickly where a school is in need of special measures.[9]

8.  Our inquiry set out to look at the existing role of governing bodies, and the implications of recent Government policy developments in education for them, as well as a range of issues concerning recruitment, reward and responsibilities.

The evidence base for our inquiry

9.  We announced our inquiry on 5 November 2012, with the following terms of reference:

  • the purpose, roles and responsibilities of school governing bodies, within the wider context of school governance and leadership
  • the implications of recent policy developments for governing bodies and their roles
  • recruiting and developing governors, including the quality of current training provision, and any challenges facing recruitment
  • the structure and membership of governing bodies, including the balance between representation and skills
  • the effectiveness and accountability of governing bodies
  • whether new arrangements are required for the remuneration of governors
  • the relationships between governing bodies and other partners, including local authorities, academy sponsors and trusts, school leaders, and unions
  • whether changes should be made to current models of governance.

10.  We received over 90 written submissions from a range of organisations and individuals including governors, local authorities, national governor infrastructure bodies, training providers, unions, academics, Ofsted and the Department for Education. We held three oral evidence sessions, hearing from five panels of witnesses:

  • serving school governors, the National Governors' Association
  • headteachers, Ofsted and Professor Chris James of the University of Bath
  • School Governors One Stop Shop (SGOSS), GL Education Group, National College of School Leadership (now the National College of Teaching and Leadership) and National Co-ordinators of Governor Services (NCOGS)
  • local authorities, NASUWT, The Haberdashers Company
  • the Minister, Lord Nash, and a DfE official

11.  We also held a seminar with school governors and visited Denmark and the Netherlands as part of our evidence gathering.

12.  We would like to thank our standing specialist adviser, Professor Alan Smithers, for his assistance with this inquiry.



1   Ev 55, para 3 Back

2   http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/leadership/governance/maintained/b00218871/govbodymaintainedschools Back

3   Ev 57, para 23 Back

4   Ev 84, para 3.2.2 Back

5   Ev 71, para 3.1 Back

6   Ev 110 Back

7   The Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector 2010/11, page 66 Back

8   The Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector 2010/11, page 66 Back

9   The Schools Inspection Handbook, Ofsted, April 2013, para 127; Sir Michael Wilshaw, speech to the NGA Conference, 16 June 2012 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2013
Prepared 4 July 2013