2 Local energy in the UK
8. In this section we explore: the role of local
energy in the UK's energy mix and the different models of ownership
of local projects, such as community, local authority, private
and joint ventures. We look at current examples of projects in
these categories and the potential for further developments.
The potential for local energy
in the UK's energy mix
9. Local energy could provide a significant proportion
of the UK's energy capacity, although it seems likely that larger
scale, centralised projects will continue to provide the majority
of our energy supply in future. In 2011, the UK had a total of
89GW of electricity generation capacity.[12]
The Combined Heat and Power Association (CHPA) said that decentralised
energy already made up 8.2% of UK electricity capacity (although
this included projects that were larger than 50MW in size).[13]
Utilyx Asset Management suggested that decentralised energy (consisting
of anerobic digestion, CHP, solar PV, trigeneration[14],
waste-to-energy, and wind) could provide 17GW of capacity by 2030.[15]
10. DECC told us that at present, 4.5GW of renewable
electricity generation comes from medium-sized projects and there
is a further 10.9GW that has either received consent or is going
through the planning system.[16]
In terms of the total potential, the UK Energy Research Centre
(UKERC) noted that there "is a lack of detailed analysis
of the potential for energy generation at this medium 5-50MW scale".[17]
Renewable Energy Systems (RES) pointed out that most onshore wind
farms fell within the 5-50MW scale and that the Government's estimate
for onshore wind capacity in 2020 was 10-13GW.[18]
Ownership
COMMUNITY-OWNED
11. Communities undertake local energy projects
for a range of different reasons. According to the UK Community
Energy Survey, most projects are motivated by a desire to save
money on energy bills (reported by 83% of projects) and to reduce
carbon emissions (80% of projects).[19]
Other reasons include improving local energy independence, community
empowerment and generating income for the community. A number
of projects also wanted to reinvest any surplus in energy efficiency
or fuel poverty measures. [20]
12. Many community energy schemes are co-operatives;
that is, businesses that are owned and run by and for their members.[21]
These can be further sub-divided into "share issue"
based co-ops, "community interest" co-ops (such as the
National Trust), "crowdfunding" initiatives (e.g. Abundance[22])
and "locality based" co-ops (where membership is restricted
to people living within a particular geographical area).[23]
An alternative model is the "community ownership" approach,
where projects are owned on behalf of all members of a local community.[24]
Share issues are a common method of financing community projects.
Many projects also rely on grant funding or loans.[25]
13. At the moment, there are only three community-owned
energy projects that fall within the 5-50MW size range: Lochcarnan
Community Windfarm, Westmill Solar Co-operative and Westmill Wind
Co-operative.[26] Several
witnesses cited a piece of research by Camco and Baker Tilly,
which estimated that there is the potential for 3.5GW of community-owned
energy (although the figure includes projects that are smaller
than 5MW).[27]
LOCAL AUTHORITY-OWNED PROJECTS
14. The motivations for local authorities to
undertake energy projects range from addressing fuel poverty to
supporting community regeneration and reducing carbon emissions.
Reducing the authority's own energy bill is another important
driver. Some, such as the London Borough of Sutton, intend to
make a profit from their ventures, which will then be ploughed
back into growing the scheme.[28]
Ownership models include wholly-owned projects (such as London
Borough of Sutton's energy recovery plant), setting up arm's length
companies (such as Aberdeen Heat and Power), and undertaking joint
ventures, once planning permission has been awarded. Finance for
projects can come from a range of sources, including grants, self-finance
and prudential borrowing (for example from the Public Works Loan
Board).[29]
15. The appetite and capacity of local authorities
to invest in local energy projects is variable.[30]
Some examples of authorities taking the lead in this area are:
- London Borough of Sutton
has committed with its partners to deliver a decentralised energy
network in the Hackbridge Sustainable Suburb with a pilot by 2015
and a full network by 2020. This network will be able to supply
energy to businesses, community facilities and homes.
- Lewes District Council
has installed solar PV on council buildings and the local leisure
centre.
- Cornwall Council has
constructed a 4.9MW solar park near Newquay Airport, which is
expected to generate an income of around £70,000.
- Woking Borough Council set
up an Energy Services Company (ESCO), which runs a number of schemes,
including a combined heat and power district energy system.
- Aberdeen Heat and Power
was set up by Aberdeen City Council as an arm's length not-for-profit
company to supply energy to public housing, public buildings and
leisure facilities .
- Orkney Islands Council
has a shareholding in Hammer's Hill 4.5MW wind turbine project.
- Bristol City Council
will install two 2.5MW wind turbines later this year, which will
produce approximately 20% of the Council's current annual electricity
use.
- Isle of Wight Council
is investing £1m in testing facilities for tidal energy as
part of a joint venture with a private sector partner. The Island
Strategic Partnership has launched an "Eco Island" vision
to be self-sufficient in renewable electricity by 2020.
- Warwick Council has
installed 5MW of solar panels on social housing properties.[31]
However, there are a number of structural difficulties
with local authority ownership models. Whilst a number of barriers
to local authority ownership of projects have been removed in
recent years, witnesses told us that considerable difficulties
in financing projects through local authority funds remain.[32]
16. District heating or "community heating"
schemes based on combined heat and power (CHP) plants, such as
those managed by Aberdeen Heat and Power and Woking Borough Council's
Energy Services Company, have the potential to make significant
efficiency savings. CHP schemes generate electricity while capturing
the heat which is a by-product of this process, thereby minimising
energy loss.[33] Community
heating schemes supply heat from a central source to multiple
buildings through a network of heat mains. Such schemes are often
found in relatively dense areas of housing, and are much more
common in countries such as Finland and Denmark where they provide
over half of domestic heating. By contrast, in the UK community
heating forms only 1% of the domestic heating market.[34]
Privately-owned
projects
17. There are a number of different models for
medium-sized energy projects that are owned by private companies,
which have varying motivations. They include:
- independent generators looking
to sell the electricity they generate for a profit (this includes
utilities and independent developers, as well as farmers and landowners);[35]
- companies investing in on-site assets for their
own use, in order to manage energy price risk, to insulate themselves
from rising energy costs and/or to meet environmental commitments;[36]
- companies investing in off-site assets (for the
same reasons as above),[37]
and
- joint ventures with local authorities and community
groups.[38]
Cornwall Energy believed there was potential for
energy intensive companies to benefit from investing in energy
projects:
This [privately-owned medium-sized projects] is a
limited but important subset of the market where generally large,
well-capitalised, well informed energy intensive companies will
invest in generation assets, primarily for on-site use. Our analysis
suggests that in the current environment significant benefits
can be realised by those consumers that do invest in assets for
on-site use. These projects enable the customer to avoid network
charges and the subsidy elements attached to imported power.[39]
18. Privately-owned energy projects may be client,
developer or investor owned:
- Client ownership is where the
client effectively owns the asset through a finance lease. The
asset transfers to the client upon expiry of the contract.
- Developer ownership is where a developer owns
the asset and has sourced project finance through debt and/or
equity. Energy is then sold via a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).
This is the most common form of ownership.
- Where projects are investor-owned, the investor
will fund and own the asset via debt/equity having entered into
a pre-agreed Energy Services Agreement with the client to sell
an agreed volume of energy at an agreed price for an agreed term.[40]
19. Internal funding, or balance sheet financing,
is generally used for smaller industrial and commercial scale
projects where renewable energy is not the core business. Debt
financing is the method often used by independent generators.
However, banks and investors have "made it clear to independent
generators that they are not prepared to invest unless the generators
have already signed a viable long-term contract (15 years typically)
with a large BBB+ credit rated company[41]
that will deliver the power into the electricity market on the
independent generator's behalf."[42]
In other words, generators
will require a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) in order to obtain
the necessary investment (see paragraph 47).
JOINTLY-OWNED
20. There are an increasing number of joint-ownership
projects, primarily between local communities and commercial developers:
In the UK, the total community and local equity in
medium-sized projects is split between joint ventures with developers
(53%) and wholly-owned (47%).[43]
However, joint ventures also occur between other
bodies. For example, the Isle of Wight Council has recently entered
a tidal energy joint venture with a private sector partner.[44]
Joint ventures can help community groups address many barriers:
Partnerships between commercial developers and communities
can provide a good mix of knowledge, skills, access to finance
and local contacts to enable developments to go ahead. Part ownership
enables greater community involvement and benefit than a community
fund allows.[45]
Joint ventures have benefits for developers, for
example they can help secure development sites.[46]
The Isle of Wight Council will re-invest any return from the joint
venture project into subsidising wider business opportunities,
and encouraging entrepreneurial and youth engagement activities.
The joint venture itself will also be used to provide educational
and job opportunities.[47]
21. Given the potential benefits,
DECC should do more to promote joint ventures between community
groups, private and public sectors. We recommend that the
option for a local ownership share in new energy projects should
be added to the industry's Community Benefit Protocol.
22. As we noted in the introduction,
there are a range of different ownership models for projects at
the medium scale, including private landowners, farmers, local
authorities, other public sector organisations and commercial
organisations, as well as those owned by community groups. However,
there is a lack of research showing what the combined contribution
of these different types of projects could be. We recommend
that DECC carries out an assessment of the potential that 5-50MW
projects of all types could play in the UK's energy mix.
12 DECC, Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics
2012, 2012 Back
13
Ev 80 (CHPA) Back
14
Trigeneration or combined cooling, heat and power (CCHP) refers
to the simultaneous generation of electricity and useful heating
and cooling from the combustion of a fuel. Back
15
Ev 33 (Utilyx) Back
16
Ev w43 (DECC) Back
17
Ev 54 (UKERC) Back
18
Ev w24 (RES) Back
19
Ev w1 (Seyfang and Smith) Back
20
Ev w1 (Seyfang and Smith), Ev 48 (Regen SW), Ev 54 (UKERC), Ev
37 (ETI) Back
21
Ev 75 (Co-op Group) Back
22
https://www.abundancegeneration.com/ Back
23
Ev w54 (Simpson) Back
24
Ev 63 (Community Energy Scotland) Back
25
Ev 84 (Good Energy), Ev 75 (Co-op Group), Ev 29 (Westmill), Ev
27 (OVESCO), Ev 40 (TRESOC), Ev w1 (Seyfang and Smith), Ev w13
(CIC), Ev w18 (REA), Ev w8 (Basi), Ev 45 (Cornwall Energy), Ev
48 (Regen SW), Ev 54 (UKERC), Ev 58 (Co-ops UK), Ev 63 (Community
Energy Scotland), Ev w68 (STA) Back
26
Ev w74(ResPublica) Back
27
Ev w40 (Energy4All), Ev 63 (Community Energy Scotland), Ev 75
(Co-operative group), Ev 58 (Co-operatives UK), Ev w8 (Basi),
Ev w62 (Friends of the Earth); Camco and Baker Tilly for The Co-operative
Group, The potential for the Green Investment Bank to support
community renewables, December 2011 Back
28
Ev 79 (LB Sutton), Ev w11 (Hampshire), Ev 37 (ETI), Ev 45 (Cornwall
Energy), Q 53 (Cllr Hall and Mr Weight) Back
29
Q 71, Ev 54 (UKERC), Ev w35 (Heat and the City), Ev w18 (REA) Back
30
Ev w74 (ResPublica), Ev 37 (ETI), Ev w22 (Orkney Islands Council) Back
31
Ev 79 (LB Sutton), Ev 27 (OVESCO), Ev 36 (Cornwall Council); Ev
48 (Regen SW), Ev w13 (Communities for Renewables), Ev w22 (Orkney
Islands Council), Ev 63 (Community Energy Scotland), Ev 48 (Regen
SW), Ev w74 (ResPublica), Ev w35 (Heat and the City), Ev w59 (Isle
of Wight Council), Ev 84 (Good Energy); Regen SW, Woking Borough
Council Energy Services, Case Study 01, March 2007 Back
32
Q53 Back
33
http://www.chpa.co.uk/ Back
34
Energy Savings Trust, Community Energy: A guide, 2004 edition Back
35
Ev 36 (Cornwall Council), Ev w24 (RES) Back
36
Ev 45 (Cornwall Energy), Ev w18 (REA), Ev w24 RES), Ev 75 (Co-Operative
Group), Ev w68 (STA) Back
37
Ev 75 (Co-operative Group), Ev 89 (BT) Back
38
Ev 27 (OVESCO), Ev 58 (Co-operatives UK), Ev w8 (Jasbir Singh
Basil), Ev w40 (Energy4All), Ev 54 (UKERC), Ev 63 (Community Energy
Scotland), Ev w59 (Isle of Wight Council), Ev w62 (Friends of
the Earth) Back
39
Ev 45 (Cornwall Energy) Back
40
Ev 33 (Utilyx) Back
41
A credit rating evaluates the credit worthiness of a debtor, especially
a business (company) or a government. It is an evaluation made
by a credit rating agency of the debtor's ability to pay back
the debt and the likelihood of default. The Standard & Poor's
credit rating scale is as follows, from excellent to poor: AAA,
AA+, AA, AA-, A+, A, A-, BBB+, BBB, BBB-, BB+, BB, BB-, B+, B,
B-, CCC+, CCC, CCC-, CC, C, D. Back
42
Independent Renewable Energy Generators, Route to Market Q&A,
www.r-e-a.net/resources/ Back
43
Ev w74 (Respublica) Back
44
Ev w59 (Isle of Wight Council) Back
45
Ev 48 (Regen SW) Back
46
Q 43 Back
47
Ev w59 (Isle of Wight Council) Back
|