Documents considered on 11 September 2013 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


2 Civil aviation safety~

(35041)

12864/13

Draft Commission Regulation (EU) No ... /... of XXX amending Regulation (EU) No. 965/2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No. 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Legal baseArticle 100(2) TFEU; co-decision; QMV
DepartmentTransport
Basis of considerationTransport Committee's Report of 9 September 2013
Previous Committee ReportHC 83-vi (2013-14), chapter 4 (19 June 2013)
Discussion in CouncilNot known
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionFor debate in European Committee A

Background

2.1 Regulation (EC) No. 216/2008 concerned civil aviation safety, partly in the context of the Chicago Convention (the 1944 Convention on International Civil Aviation and its annexes). It established the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to assist the Commission in the development and implementation of legislative and non-legislative safety measures.

2.2 In June the Government drew our attention to the probable issue of a draft Commission Regulation setting flight and duty time limitation (FTL) requirements for the crew of aeroplanes involved in commercial air transport. The proposal is a safety measure designed to protect crew from levels of fatigue which would affect their ability to carry out their duties safely. (Separate legislation already sets limits on working time for social reasons.) The proposal is based on an Opinion published by the EASA in October 2012[6] and takes the form of an amendment to Commission Regulation 965/2012, which established safety standards for air operations.[7]

2.3 When we considered this issue we noted that it had been the subject of a Transport Committee report[8] and a Westminster Hall debate.[9] So we said that, before considering the proposal again, we should welcome, in terms of Standing Order No. 143(11), an Opinion on it from the Transport Committee. Meanwhile the proposal remained under scrutiny.[10]

The Transport Committee's Opinion

2.4 The Transport Committee's response to our request is in its Report of a short inquiry into the Commission's new proposal.[11] Whilst recognising that this is an improvement on the EASA's earlier proposal, the Transport Committee records a number of continuing concerns and makes a number of suggestions for Government action. It also recommends that we should ask the Commission to:

  • address the matters raised in the report, including ensuring effective monitoring of the new flight time Regulation; and
  • provide an assessment of the Regulation two years after its implementation.

Conclusion

2.5 We are grateful to the Transport Committee for its response, against a tight deadline, to our request. We note its conclusions, including its recommendations to us.

2.6 In the light of the Transport Committee's continued reservations about the Commission's proposals and its suggestions to the Government as to how matters might be improved, we recommend that the document be debated in European Committee A. This will allow Members to examine the issues with the Minister. The debate should take place before the Council's final decision on the matter, which we understand is likely to be in October.

2.7 As for the Transport Committee's recommendations to us we are writing to the Commission as suggested.


6   See http://www.easa.europa.eu/agency-measures/docs/opinions/2012/04/EN%20to%20Opinion%2004-2012.pdf. Back

7   See http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/13/st12/st12864.en13.pdf. Back

8   First Report from the Transport Committee, 2012-13, Flight time limitations, HC 164 and Fifth Special Report from the Transport Committee, 2012-13, Flight time limitations: Government Response to the Committee's First Report of Session 2012-13, HC 558. Back

9   HC Deb, 22 November 2012, cols. 231WH-248WH. Back

10   See headnote. Back

11   Transport Committee, Sixth report of Session 2013-14, Flight time limitations: follow up, HC 641: see http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmtran/641/64102.htm.  Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2013
Prepared 8 October 2013