Documents considered on 11 September 2013 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


4 The European Social Fund ~

(35269)

13121/13

COM(13) 560

Draft Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 as regards the financial allocation for certain Member States from the European Social Fund

Legal baseArticle 177 TFEU; co-decision; QMV
Document originated25 July 2013
Deposited in Parliament27 August 2013
DepartmentBusiness, Innovation and Skills
Basis of considerationEM of 9 September 2013
Previous Committee ReportNone, but HC 83-xiii (2013-14), chapter 20 (4 September 2013) is relevant
Discussion in Council30 September 2013
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionNot cleared; further information requested

Background

4.1 At its meeting on 27/28 June, the European Council agreed Conclusions which set out a number of concrete measures to tackle youth unemployment and to "mobilise all available instruments in support of youth employment."[15] The measures include €6 billion of funding in 2014 and 2015 from the Youth Employment Initiative for regions with levels of youth unemployment exceeding 25%, and the use of the European Social Fund (ESF) to support the creation of new jobs for young workers.

4.2 In July, the Commission put forward its seventh draft amending budget for 2013, followed in August by a draft Decision on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument.[16] This Instrument allows the financing of clearly identified expenditure which could not be financed within the limits of the ceilings available for one or more Headings of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF).

4.3 The draft amending budget proposed an increase of €150 million (£131 million) in commitment appropriations in Heading 1b of the current MFF covering the period 2007-13. This increase was intended to allow for additional commitments to the 2013 ESF allocations for France, Italy and Spain in recognition of "the special effort needed to address the specific situations of unemployment, in particular youth unemployment, and of poverty and social exclusion in these Member States."

4.4 In presenting the proposal the Commission indicated that:

  • it has "the aim of addressing certain issues resulting from the final outcome of the negotiations of the MFF for the years 2014-2020, affecting France, Italy and Spain";
  • the June European Council "considered that a budgetary solution should be given to that matter"; and
  • the most appropriate way to assist the three Member States is by increasing the ESF.

4.5 The Commission proposed that the increase in commitment appropriations would be covered by the margin under the ceiling of Heading 1b, that is €16 million (£14 million), and by mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for €134 million (£117 million). Our Thirteenth Report of 4 September 2013 provides a more detailed overview.

4.6 The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Greg Clark) told us that the Government supported the content of the Commission's proposals, as part of a wider commitment to tackle youth unemployment, adding that the proposed increase in ESF commitment appropriations in 2013 for France, Spain and Italy was agreed unanimously as part of the June European Council deal. He noted that France, Spain and Italy had the highest youth unemployment rates of all Member States and the extra commitments could be used to complement their Youth Employment Initiative funds.

4.7 Turning to the financial implications of the proposal the Minister told us that:

  • in accordance with the payment rules of the Structural Funds, all payment applications for a programme were assigned to the earliest open commitments and that no additional payments would arise in 2013 for these additional commitments, which would pay out in future years;
  • payment appropriations in 2013 would therefore stay unchanged;
  • the commitments increase would still leave a margin of €1.8 billion (£1.6 billion) in overall 2013 commitment appropriations;
  • since the commitments would turn into payments gradually, the payments flowing out of these commitments would likely be spread over a long period;
  • the UK's contributions to the payments flowing out of these commitments would be determined by its financing share in those years;
  • whilst the lack of information on the annual payment profile of the proposed additional commitments meant that the Government was not yet able to calculate the exact cost to the UK, the UK's post-abatement financing share was currently estimated to be around 12.5% in 2013; and
  • based on that financing share assumption, the seventh draft amending budget for 2013 would cost the UK less than €19 million (£16.60 million), spread over a number of years, if all the commitments were fully implemented. 

4.8 Whilst acknowledging the importance attached by the European Council to tackling youth unemployment, we sought further information on two aspects of the Commission's proposals. First, we asked the Minister to explain what the Commission meant when it referred to "certain issues resulting from the final outcome of the negotiations of the MFF for the years 2014-2020, affecting France, Italy and Spain." Second, we asked what scope there was for transferring commitment appropriations from elsewhere in the 2013 Budget, rather than having recourse to the Flexibility Instrument.

The draft amending Regulation

4.9 The Commission has proposed a draft Regulation which would amend the figures set out in the 2006 Regulation establishing the framework and resources for EU Structural and Cohesion Funds (including the ESF) for 2007-13 in order to reflect the outcome agreed by the European Council in June. In its explanatory memorandum accompanying the draft amending Regulation, the Commission reiterates its earlier statement that:

"In the context of the negotiations of the new Multiannual Financial Framework for 2014-20, certain issues stemming from the final outcome of the negotiations should be addressed."

4.10 The Commission makes clear that the bulk of the additional commitments — €100 million — would be allocated to France, with €30 million for Italy and €20 million for Spain. As the commitment appropriations concern the year 2013, it underlines the need for urgency in agreeing the changes to the 2006 Regulation.

The Government's view

4.11 The Minister for Business and Enterprise (Mr Michael Fallon) explains:

"In the context of the current economic crisis and in recognition of the special effort needed to address the specific situations of unemployment, especially youth unemployment, and poverty and social exclusion in three Member States, France, Spain and Italy, the European Council in June 2013 decided to assist them by increasing their funding from the European Social Fund (ESF) for 2013."[17]

4.12 He confirms that the draft amending Regulation would make provision for additional commitments of €100 million, €30 million and €20 million respectively for France, Italy and Spain as part of their 2013 ESF allocations, adding:

"The compensation will be provided from the 2007-2013 budget covered by the margin under the expenditure ceiling of budget Heading 1b and by the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument."[18]

4.13 The Minister describes the Commission's proposal as "a technical amendment" to the 2006 Regulation which does not alter the scope of the ESF and implements what was agreed unanimously by the European Council in June. He continues:

"France, Spain and Italy will be the highest recipients of the youth employment initiative funding of all the EU Member States and the extra commitments will be used to tackle the problems of youth unemployment in advance of the Youth Employment Imitative funding which will commence in 2014. The UK supports the focus of this funding on tackling youth unemployment."

4.14 The financial implications of the draft Regulation are described in exactly the same terms as in the Explanatory Memorandum provided by the Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Greg Clark) on the seventh draft amending budget for 2013. The Council is expected to consider the proposal on 30 September.

Conclusion

4.15 We are unwilling to clear the draft amending Regulation until the Treasury has responded to the two questions we raised in our Thirteenth Report. First, we would like to hear how this proposal relates to the negotiations on the EU's Multiannual Financial Framework for 2014-20 and which issues stemming from the outcome of those negotiations it is intended to address. Second, we wish to ascertain what efforts have been made to transfer commitment appropriations from elsewhere in the 2013 budget, rather than having recourse to the Flexibility Instrument.

4.16 We note that the increase of €150 million in commitment appropriations would only affect ESF allocations for France, Spain and Italy and is intended to address youth unemployment, poverty and social exclusion in these Member States. We ask the Minister to explain why the European Council unanimously agreed additional commitments for these three Member States, even though Greece has the highest youth unemployment rate in the EU (62.9% in May 2013), the rate in Portugal is comparable to that in Italy (37.4% and 39.5% respectively in July 2013), and France is one of a number of Member States with a rate exceeding 20%. Pending a response to our questions, the draft Regulation remains under scrutiny.



15   See http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/137634.pdf  Back

16   See 12769/13 and 12770/13. Back

17   Para 1 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back

18   Para 2 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2013
Prepared 8 October 2013