9 The broadband investment environment
(35312)
13566/13
COM(13) 5761
| Commission Recommendation on consistent non-discrimination obligations and costing methodologies to promote competition and enhance the broadband investment environment
|
Legal base |
|
Document originated | 11 September 2013
|
Deposited in Parliament | 1 October 2013
|
Department | Culture, Media and Sport
|
Basis of consideration | EM of 19 October 2013
|
Previous Committee Report | None
|
Discussion in Council | None
|
Committee's assessment | Politically important
|
Committee's decision | Cleared
|
Background
9.1 The Digital Agenda for Europe (DAE), a flagship initiative
of Europe 2020 strategy for a smart, sustainable and inclusive
economy, has set a goal to make every European digital and ensure
Europe's competitiveness in the 21st century. The DAE broadband
targets are:
- basic broadband for all by 2013;
- Next Generation Networks (NGN) (30 Mbps or more)
for all by 2020; and
- of households having 100 Mbps subscriptions or
higher.
9.2 The Commission says that its policy framework
to achieve these targets encourages both private and public investment
in fast and ultra-fast networks.[26]
The Commission Recommendation
9.3 The Recommendation aims to promote competition,
through the application of tougher non-discrimination rules; and
investment, by allowing for flexibility in the pricing of new
wholesale next generation access (NGA) services, while ensuring
stable wholesale "copper access" prices. The Recommendation
applies only to the market for wholesale network infrastructure
access and the wholesale broadband access market. It consists
of four sets of measures covering:
- non-discrimination;
- compliance monitoring of the non-discrimination
obligation;
- costing methodology; and
- the non-imposition of regulated wholesale prices
on NGA networks.
9.4 Each of these sub-headings is analysed and
commented upon by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for
Culture, Communications and Creative Industries at the Department
for Culture, Media and Sport (Edward Vaizey) in his Explanatory
Memorandum of 10 October 2013 as follows:
NON-DISCRIMINATION
"The Recommendation states that an effective
level playing field between an incumbent operator with a position
of Significant Market Power (SMP) and alternative operators is
best achieved through the application of Equivalence of Inputs
(EOI).[27] It requires
national Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) to examine whether it would
be proportionate to provide relevant wholesale inputs on this
basis.
"We agree that EOI is the surest way to achieve
effective protection for non-discrimination. BT's NGA product
(Virtual Unbundled Local Access -VULA) is already subject to the
obligation of EOI and, as a result, the current UK regulatory
framework already produces outcomes that are consistent with the
Recommendation.
COMPLIANCE MONITORING OF THE NON-DISCRIMINATION OBLIGATION
"The Recommendation states that compliance with
the non-discrimination obligation is to be assured through the
use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) agreed between incumbent
(SMP) operators and alternative access seekers. These KPIs should
be fostered by the NRA if necessary. They should also be supplemented
by Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and Service Level Guarantees
(SLGs).
COSTING METHODOLOGY
"The Recommendation provides guidance on the
costing methods that NRAs should adopt when modelling the costs
of wholesale NGA and copper access products providing detailed
guidance on the following important elements:
- "How to calculate the
costs of an NGA network;[28]
- "How to value re-usable civil engineering
assets, such as ducts;[29]
and
- "How calculate the costs of wholesale copper
access services.
- "The Recommendation anticipates
that application of the proposed costing methods will lead to
stable copper access prices within a band between 8 and
10 (net of all taxes) expressed in 2012 prices.[30]
"Overall, we share the aim of achieving stable
copper prices during a period of technological change. Like the
Commission, we see an environment of relatively stable copper
prices as likely to be conducive to efficient investment in NGA
and to provide a safeguard to access seekers and ultimately consumers.
We also agree with the Commission that copper networks will be
replaced by fibre (NGA) networks and from a UK perspective an
FTTC network is the network topology being implemented by BT.
THE NON-IMPOSITION OF REGULATED WHOLESALE PRICES
ON NGA NETWORKS (I.E. FIBRE NETWORKS)
"The Recommendation provides guidance on the
conditions which need to be satisfied before NRAs can lift (or
decide not to impose) strict wholesale pricing obligations on
new NGA services. Regulators should decide not to impose, or to
remove, pricing obligations on NGA wholesale inputs only when
these inputs are subject to the EOI obligation and significant
competitive constraints.
"The current UK regulatory framework already
results in an outcome which is consistent with the Commission's
recommended approach BT's NGA product (VULA) is subject
to the obligation of EOI, but not any pricing obligations.
"We agree with the Commission that (wholesale)
pricing flexibility has an important role to play in investment
in new technology, as it enables operators to trial different
pricing arrangements in the early (uncertain) period of such investments.
However the Recommendation goes further and stresses that such
pricing flexibility is particularly important when, in addition
to the competitive constraints, SMP operators have also implemented
EOI effectively. While we recognise the strength of this argument,
pricing and non-discrimination obligations affect the market in
different ways and therefore are not necessarily substitutable.
However, the text of the Recommendation is sufficiently flexible
that, should competitive safeguards fail to constrain the wholesale
price of new NGA services, NRAs could still consider the imposition
of pricing obligations even where EOI was in place."
The Government's view
9.5 In addition to his comments above, the Minister
notes that the Recommendation is adopted as part of a wider package
which includes the Proposal for a Regulation laying down measures
concerning the European single market for electronic communications
and to achieve a Connected Continent.
9.6 He also says that the Recommendation was
widely discussed and considered during 2012 and 2013, prior to
which Ofcom had responded to an initial Commission consultation
in October 2011 (through BEREC);[31]
and that BEREC provided a formal Opinion on the draft Recommendation
at the end of March 2013.
9.7 With regard to its implications, the Minister
says that, as Commission Recommendations are only to be "taken
utmost account of'", and as many of the specific recommendations
are already consistent with the way that Ofcom approaches issues
of costing and non-discrimination in the UK, he does not think
that it will lead to the imposition of costs on business in the
UK.
9.8 Finally, the Minister says that the Recommendation
was adopted at the July COCOM meeting, and will not be considered
by the Council.[32]
Conclusion
9.9 Given their non-legislative nature, it
is not customary for such Commission Recommendations to be deposited,
particularly if they are non-contentious. In this instance, however,
the Minister chose to do so because of its being part of the Commission's
latest "telecoms package", which we consider elsewhere
in this Report.[33]
9.10 We therefore consider it warrants reporting
to the House, and now clear it.
26 For full information, see https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/about-broadband. Back
27
EOI means the provision of services and information to internal
and third-party access seekers on the same terms and conditions,
including price and quality of service levels, within the same
time scales using the same systems and processes, and with the
same degree of reliability and performance. Back
28
The proposed methodology is to be based on the incremental capital
and operating costs borne by an efficient provider of access services
and add a mark-up for recovery of common costs. Back
29
The proposed methodology is to value these at their indexed net
book value. It is recommended that regulators employ a Regulatory
Asset Base (RAB) which consists of the civil engineering assets
valued at current costs reduced by elapsed economic life (and
hence costs already recovered). Once an asset is fully depreciated
it is no longer part of the RAB and no longer represents a cost
for the alternative access seeker. Back
30
Full LLU monthly rental fee (voice + ADSL services) UK: 9.05
= GBP 7.66 at today's exchange rate. EU27 average 7.97
= GBP 6.74 (Cullen research March 2013). Back
31
Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications http://berec.europa.eu/
. Back
32
The COCOM is a committee composed of Member State representatives.
Its main role is to provide an opinion on the draft measures
that the Commission intends to adopt. The COCOM deals with the
current issues which form the Digital Agenda, such as:
Commission Implementing Regulation on
Roaming;
The regulation on the measures applicable
to the notification of personal data breaches;
The call for expressions of interest
for the selection of the "EU Top Level Domain Registry";
The implementation of the single European
emergency number 112.
The COCOM operates:
o through advisory and examination procedure
in accordance with Comitology Regulation;
o through regulatory procedure with
scrutiny in accordance with Comitology Decision.
The COCOM was established in 2002 under
the Framework Directive.
Members of the Committee meet usually
five times a year in Brussels. Observers from candidate and EEA
countries participate in the meetings. Moreover, experts from
European telecommunications associations may be invited in the
meeting for specific agenda points. See https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/communications-committee
for full information. Back
33
See (35304) 13555/13 at chapter 2. Back
|