Twenty-fifth Report of Session 2013-14 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


13 Roma integration

(35137)

11738/13

COM(13) 460

Draft Council Recommendation on effective Roma integration measures in the Member States
Legal baseArticles 19(1) and 292 TFEU; unanimity; EP consent
DepartmentCommunities and Local Government
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 19 November 2013
Previous Committee ReportHC 83-xiii (2013-14), chapter 8 (4 September 2013)
Discussion in CouncilExpected to be adopted on 9 December 2013
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background and previous scrutiny

13.1 Roma —a generic term encompassing a variety of groups of people sharing broadly similar cultural characteristics, including Gypsies and Travellers — constitute the EU's largest ethnic minority (estimated at 6 million). 80% of the Roma population is sedentary and is disproportionately affected by unemployment, poverty, bad housing and poor health standards. The treatment of Roma has risen up the political agenda because of the accession to the EU in 2004 and 2007 of Member States with a significant Roma population.[31]

13.2 In 2011, Member States endorsed an EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies which invited them to develop their own strategies incorporating four common "Roma integration goals" covering access to education, employment, healthcare, and housing and other essential services.[32] The Commission considered that a specific framework for Roma was needed because EU equality legislation, while important, was insufficient to combat the "prejudice, intolerance, discrimination and social exclusion" which Roma encountered in their daily lives. The Commission also recognised, however, that the size of the Roma community as a proportion of the total population in each Member State varied significantly, and that the scale of the challenges which Member States faced, as well as their starting points for tackling Roma exclusion, were likely to differ in magnitude.

13.3 The purpose of the draft Council Recommendation is to encourage ongoing political commitment to the four Roma integration goals by providing practical guidance to enhance the effectiveness of national Roma integration measures and strengthen the implementation of national strategies. It would introduce an annual reporting mechanism for Member States to inform the yearly progress reports produced by the Commission and, where appropriate, the development of Country Specific Recommendations as part of the European Semester. The Commission considers that further action at EU level is justified because the absence of a coordinated approach has resulted in increasing discrepancies in the laws and policies applied by Member States which could, in turn, result in migration to Member States with more favourable conditions. The draft Recommendation is not legally binding and is intended to complement existing EU anti-discrimination legislation, notably the Race Directive.[33] Our Thirteenth Report of 4 September 2013 provides a more detailed overview of the draft Recommendation and the Government's position.

13.4 Whilst accepting that it is appropriate for the Commission to monitor progress towards better Roma integration, the Government considers that the draft Recommendation is too prescriptive and fails to reflect the differences in situation of the Roma across the EU and the diversity of approaches taken by Member States to promote integration. It told us that it would seek to play an active and constructive role in negotiations and to achieve "a flexible Council Recommendation that takes account of the different situations in different Member States and gives maximum discretion on how to approach this issue."[34]

13.5 We noted that more effective policies to promote the social and economic integration of Roma communities could help to defuse the political tensions that have arisen in recent years as Roma have sought to exercise their free movement rights, but agreed with the Government that a prescriptive, top-down approach was not appropriate. We could see no reason why the Government should not succeed in achieving its negotiating objectives, given that unanimity within the Council would be required to endorse the draft Recommendation, but asked to be kept informed of the progress of negotiations.

The Minister's letter of 19 November 2013

13.6 The Minister for Communities (Stephen Williams) tells us that the Government has succeeded in securing "numerous changes" to the draft Council Recommendation and considers that the revised text is "flexible, proportionate and realistic." He invites us to clear the proposal from scrutiny so that the Government is in a position to support its adoption at the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs (EPSCO) Council on 9 December. He highlights the following changes:

·  a clear recognition that the social and economic situation of the Roma varies widely across the EU and affirmation that Roma integration is primarily the responsibility of Member States;

·  the removal of prescriptive language in the key policy areas of education, health, employment and housing, as well as the inclusion of possible measures at national level that remain optional for Member States;

·  flexibility for Member States to determine how to target EU funding according to national priorities;

·  the removal of "top-down" targets which are at odds with the UK's approach of providing mainstream services through locally delivered, flexible provision; and

·  more proportionate monitoring and reporting arrangements which are broadly in line with current practice in the UK.

13.7 The Minister concludes:

"The Government wants all EU Member States, particularly those with large and disadvantaged Roma populations, to take effective action to integrate their Roma citizens. We believe that the latest text of the Roma Recommendation will assist with this, while avoiding the prescriptive top-down approach that was such a strong feature of the original Commission proposal. I therefore hope that the Committee will be able to clear the draft Council Recommendation from scrutiny in time for the EPSCO meeting on 9 December."

Conclusion

13.8 We thank the Minister for his report on the outcome of negotiations. We agree with his analysis of the changes to the draft Council Recommendation and consider that the proposal strikes an appropriate balance between practical guidance on Roma integration measures and the need for a diversity of approaches to reflect the different challenges Member States face, as well as their different starting points for tackling Roma exclusion. We are now content to clear the draft Recommendation from scrutiny.




31   Roma constitute more than 7% of the population of Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia.  Back

32   See: 8727/11 (32664); HC 428-xxvi (2010-12), chapter 7 (11 May 2011).  Back

33   Council Directive 2000/43/EC; OJ L No. 180, 19.07.2000, pp. 22-26.  Back

34   See the Explanatory Memorandum of 24 July 2013 submitted by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Mr Don Foster).  Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2013
Prepared 6 December 2013