Twenty-seventh Report of Session 2013-14 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


13   Firearms and the internal security of the EU

(35448)

15369/13

COM(13) 716

Commission Communication: Firearms and the internal security of the EU: protecting citizens and disrupting illegal trafficking

Legal base
Document originated21 October 2013
Deposited in Parliament30 October 2013
DepartmentHome Office
Basis of considerationEM of 14 November 2013
Previous Committee ReportNone
Discussion in CouncilNo date set
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

13.1  The UN Firearms Protocol is one of three Protocols to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime. It entered into force in July 2005 and seeks to promote cooperation in preventing, combating and eradicating the illicit manufacture of, and trafficking in, firearms, their component parts and ammunition. We have recently considered a draft Council Decision authorising the EU to ratify those parts of the Firearms Protocol that are within EU competence.[45] The Firearms Protocol and the recently adopted United Nations Arms Trade Treaty establish an international framework for controlling the transfer of, and trade in, firearms and weaponry.

13.2  The EU already has in place minimum harmonised rules on the acquisition, possession and movement of firearms for lawful civilian uses which were adopted in 1991, in anticipation of the lifting of internal border controls on 1 January 1993.[46] The so-called Firearms Directive is intended to ensure public safety within the EU internal market and was amended in 2008 to bring it into line with the requirements of the Firearms Protocol by, for example, strengthening the rules on record keeping, the marking and registration of weapons (to improve traceability), and including provision for regulating the activities of brokers.[47] A further Directive, adopted in 2009, establishes harmonised rules and procedures for the transfer between Member States of defence-related products (including firearms and ammunition), whilst a 2012 Regulation harmonises procedures for authorising the export of non-military firearms to third (non-EU) countries in line with the Firearms Protocol.[48] Other EU measures include Common Positions (replacing an earlier Code of Conduct) on the control of exports of military technology and equipment and on the control of arms brokering, as well as a Strategy agreed in 2005 to combat the illicit accumulation and trafficking of small arms, light weapons and their ammunition. Action to disrupt illicit manufacturing and trafficking in firearms is one of the EU's law enforcement priorities for tackling serious international and organised crime for the period 2014-17.

13.3  Through these measures, the Commission suggests, the EU has sought:

"a balanced approach to regulating the lawful circulation of civilian (i.e. non-military) firearms in the internal market, to disrupting the illicit circulation and use of civilian firearms, and to [developing] standards on the transfer and brokering of conventional military arms."[49]

The Commission Communication

13.4  The Commission estimates that there are approximately 80 million legally-held civilian firearms in the EU. Whilst recognising that these firearms have legitimate civilian uses, the Commission also highlights the devastating impact for citizens and communities if they fall into the wrong hands. It notes the involvement of organised crime in the illegal production, importation and sale of firearms, as well as their use by "terrorists and extremists" to instil fear and carry out mass killings. Since the mid-1990s, powerful military grade weapons have been trafficked to the EU from areas of conflict in the EU's neighbourhood, and there is a growing online trade in firearms and their components, as well as concerns that non-lethal weapons (such as air guns or alarm guns) are being illegally converted into lethal weaponry.

13.5  The purpose of the Communication is to propose "an integrated policy" to address, by means of legislation, operational action, training and EU funding, the manifold security risks associated with the misuse of all types of firearms, civilian or military, whether obtained legally or illicitly. It responds to calls from the European Parliament for more action to "identify and to address vulnerabilities in the lifecycle of firearms, to safeguard lawful production, sale and possession of firearms, to disrupt criminal supply chains and to deter illicit use".[50]

13.6  The Communication identifies four priority areas of activity, each accompanied by a set of tasks to be undertaken between 2014 and 2017. These are listed in Annex 1 at the end of this chapter and include:

  • Safeguarding the licit market for civilian firearms by:
    • clarifying which firearms are banned and which require a licence;
    • establishing an EU standard on the marking of firearms, components and ammunition; and
    • simplifying the rules for firearms licensing and considering the need for compulsory registration and screening of brokers.
  • Reducing the diversion of firearms into criminal hands by:
    • updating controls on the sale and illegal manufacture or diversion of firearms, with a particular focus on arms fairs and online sales;
    • preventing theft and loss of legally-held firearms;
    • reducing the threat of diversion from third (non-EU) countries; and
    • promoting destruction rather than deactivation as the preferred means of disposal of surplus firearms.
  • Increasing pressure on criminal markets by:
    • updating guidance to law enforcement officers;
    • strengthening cross-border cooperation to prevent illegal possession and circulation of firearms;
    • building cooperation to trace firearms used by criminals; and
    • strengthening deterrence by ensuring greater consistency amongst Member States in the definition of criminal offences associated with the misuse of firearms and in the level of criminal sanctions.
  • Building a better intelligence picture by:
    • gathering more accurate and comprehensive data on firearms-related crime; and
    • better targeting of law enforcement training.

13.7  The Commission says that it will only put forward new and proportionate legislative proposals if they are necessary, after carrying out further, thorough analysis of the problems identified in the Communication and the underlying causes, and consulting stakeholders. The timing of any new legislative action will be determined by a report to be produced by the Commission by July 2015 on the application of the existing Firearms Directive.[51]

The Government's view

13.8  The Minister for Crime Prevention (Norman Baker) says that the UK has comprehensive firearms controls as well as "some of the toughest gun laws in the world".[52] He expresses the Government's full support for the general objectives of the Communication, which seek to protect citizens and disrupt illegal trafficking in firearms, and notes that the Government's recent Serious and Organised Crime Strategy (published in October 2013) highlights the threat presented by illegal firearms and the need to do more to develop effective counter measures and capabilities. He particularly welcomes discussions on strengthening cooperation, improving intelligence sharing, and increasing pressure on criminal markets.

13.9  Turning to the justification for further action at EU level, the Minister continues:

"Overall the objective of protecting citizens and disrupting illegal trafficking is, by reason of the international nature of the problem, better addressed at the Union level. Therefore, we are satisfied that this is a proper area of Europe-wide discussion, and that proposals for collaborative working between Member States complies (sic) with the principle of subsidiarity."[53]

13.10  He adds that any legislative proposals brought forward by the Commission in 2015 will require separate analysis to determine whether they are compliant with the subsidiarity principle.

Conclusion

13.11  Protecting citizens against the misuse of firearms and establishing better controls on illegal trafficking are clearly of paramount importance. We think it a leap of faith to conclude, as the Minister suggests, that these general objectives, "by reason of the international nature of the problem", can be better addressed at EU level. We note that some of the ideas put forward in the Communication — for example, the introduction of mandatory health checks to supplement existing criminal record checks — may prove to be contentious. We are therefore pleased to note that no new legislation will be proposed until the Commission has undertaken a further, thorough analysis and produced an accompanying impact assessment. Once it has done so, we expect the Government to provide a far more detailed assessment of the legal and policy implications of, and justification for, further EU action. Meanwhile, we are content to clear the Communication from scrutiny while drawing it to the attention of the House.


45   See (34793) 7933/13: HC 86-xxxix (2012-13), chapter 10 (24 April 2013). Back

46   Council Directive 91/477/EEC, OJ No. L 256, 13.09.91, p.51. Back

47   See Directive 2008/51/EC, OJ No. L 179, 08.07.08. Back

48   See Regulation 258/2012, OJ No. L 94, 30.03.12. Back

49   See p.7 of the Communication. Back

50   See p.7 of the Communication. Back

51   See Article 1(12) of Directive 2008/51/EC amending Council Directive 91/477/EEC on the acquisition and possession of weapons. Back

52   See para 16 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back

53   See para 14 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2013
Prepared 23 December 2013