Documents considered by the Committee on 15 January 2014 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


8 Statistics

(34914)

9396/13

COM(13) 247

Draft Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No. 691/2011 on European environmental economic accounts
Legal baseArticle 338(1) TFEU; co-decision; QMV
DepartmentOffice for National Statistics
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 13 January 2014
Previous Committee ReportsHC 83-v (2013-14), chapter 9 (12 June 2013) and HC 83-xx (2013-14), chapter 15 (6 November 2013)
Discussion in CouncilNot known
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionNot cleared; further information requested

Background

8.1 Environmental accounts are "satellite accounts" to the main National Accounts — that is extensions to the National Accounts which allow for analysis of the wider impact of economic change, in this case the interaction of the economy with the environment. The accounts use similar concepts to those employed in the National Accounts and reflect the recommended EU and United Nations frameworks for developing such accounts. Regulation (EU) No. 691/2011, the Environmental Accounts Regulation, introduced modules for three such satellite accounts — air emissions accounts, environmentally related taxes and economy-wide material flow accounts. The Regulation provided for the possibility of additional modules.

8.2 With this draft Regulation the Commission proposes introduction of three additional modules of accounts:

·  environmental protection expenditure accounts;

·  environmental goods and services sector accounts; and

·  physical energy flow accounts.

8.3 When we last considered this proposal, in November 2013, we noted that:

·  there had been a number of improvements to the draft Regulation, during Council working party negotiations;

·  these changes, if secured in negotiations between the Council and the European Parliament, would result in significant savings to UK producers of these statistics, especially in the development phase;

·  the first reading of the proposal was to continue in the Council working party on 10 October, but with the matters already agreed considered by the Presidency to be closed; and

·  the UK and other Member States were seeking further changes to the draft Regulation, in particular to secure a change from delegated act to implementing acts to decide the detailed breakdowns of the statistics.

8.4 We said that we hoped to hear of further progress before the Council adopted a first reading general approach. Meanwhile the document remained under scrutiny.[29]

The Minister's letter

8.5 The Minister for Civil Society, Cabinet Office (Mr Nick Hurd), tells us that, following further discussion in the Council working party on statistics, Coreper has now agreed a mandate for an informal trilogue with the European Parliament. He says that this current mandate adequately alleviates the Government's concerns about difficulties with the proposal in respect of reference years, transmission deadlines and the use of delegated acts to decide the detailed breakdowns of these statistics in the future. He notes in particular that:

·  Member States have agreed to the use of implementing acts for deciding the future detailed breakdown of statistics; and

·  those improvements described to us previously have been maintained, including importantly, that the first reference year for the transmission schedule will be 2015.

8.6 The Minister says that:

·  the Greek Presidency will now take forward negotiations with the European Parliament with a view to reaching an early first-reading agreement; and

·  he will, "as far as the emerging Council timetable allows", ensure that the Committee is updated on developments before the proposal goes to the Council for approval.

Conclusion

8.7 We are grateful to the Minister for his latest account of where matters stand on this proposal. We expect to hear of further progress before the Council adopts the proposal. (In that connection we remind him that his caveat, "as far as the emerging Council timetable allows", is not compatible with the House's Scrutiny Reserve Resolution.) Meanwhile the document remains under scrutiny.





29   See headnote. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 23 January 2014