Documents considered by the Committee on 26 February 2014 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


2 Climate and energy policy: 2020 to 2030

(35754)

5644/14

+ ADDs 1-2

COM(14) 15

Commission Communication: A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030
Legal base
Document originated23 January 2014
Deposited in Parliament28 January 2014
DepartmentEnergy and Climate Change
Basis of considerationEM of 19 February 2014
Previous Committee ReportNone; but see footnotes
Discussion in CouncilSee para 2.20 below
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionFor debate in European Committee A, with the Commission Communication and Recommendation on High Volume Hydraulic Facturing (Fracking) in the EU

Background

2.1 The EU's climate and energy package has sought to achieve by 2020 a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% share for renewable energy, and a 20% increase in energy efficiency. According to the Commission, much has been accomplished, with the Union well on track to meet these targets — an achievement which it describes as all the more significant, given that the European economy has grown by about 45% in real terms since the base year of 1990. However, the Commission comments that much has changed, most notably the effect of the economic and financial crisis on the capacity of Member States to invest; the impact of the high level of fossil fuel prices on the Union's trade balance and energy costs; the substantial shift in global energy demand towards the emerging economies; the increasing price differential with many of the EU's trading partners, most notably the United States; the extent to which the Emissions Trading System (ETS) has failed to drive investment in low-carbon technologies; and the new challenges posed by the further development of renewable energy technologies.

2.2 At the same time, the Commission suggests that there has been further confirmation of the likely impact of human influence on climate change, and of the consequent need for substantial and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. It says that it is therefore now time to consider the policy framework needed until 2030 in the light of the responses to the Green Paper[6] it issued in 2013. In particular, it sees the need to make an ambitious commitment to further reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in line with the cost-effective pathway described in the 2050 roadmaps[7] it produced in 2011, and in the process to provide regulatory certainty for investors, and to spur research and innovation into, and the development of, new technologies. It says that this approach should be based on the full implementation of the 20/20/20 targets, together with:

·  a simplification of the European policy framework, combined with improving coherence between objectives and instruments;

·  within that framework, providing flexibility for Member States to adopt an approach appropriate to their own circumstances, preferred energy mix, and energy security needs;

·  strengthening regional cooperation between Member States;

·  building upon the momentum behind the development of renewables;

·  a clear understanding of the factors which determine energy costs, so as to clarify what can, and cannot, be influenced by national and Union policy;

·  improving energy security, whilst delivering a low-carbon and competitive energy system;

·  enhancing investor certainty by providing clear signals on the policy framework after 2020; and

·  a fair sharing of effort between Member States, which reflects their specific circumstances and capacities.

KEY ELEMENTS

2.3 The Commission says that, although views differed on the level of ambition to be achieved, there was a broad consensus among respondents to its Green Paper that a new target for greenhouse gas emissions is desirable, but that there were mixed views on the need for new targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency. It also says that an analysis confirms the conclusion of the Energy Roadmap 2050, that the costs of a low carbon transition do not differ substantially from those which will be incurred in any event because of the need to renew an aging energy system and rising fossil fuel prices, but that there will be a major shift away from expenditure on fuels towards innovative equipment with a high added value. It also suggests that this process should be assisted by the targeted industrial policy outlined in its Communication[8] for an Industrial Renaissance, and it goes on to observe that increased flexibility for Member States should be combined with a strong European governance framework, which is coherent with the wider principles of European energy policy, including further integration of the internal market and the delivery of a competitive, secure and sustainable energy system.

2.4 The framework would include the following specific elements.

Greenhouse gas emissions target

2.5 The Commission proposes a reduction target for domestic EU emissions of 40% in 2030 relative to those in 1990, noting that existing measures arising from Member States' current obligations will continue to have an effect after 2020, and can be expected to deliver a 32% reduction (which, whilst requiring considerable effort, shows that the proposed target for 2030 is feasible). It adds that this target must be shared between the ETS and the sectors not covered by it, with the ETS delivering by 2030 a reduction of 43% in greenhouse gases compared with 2005 (implying that the annual reduction in the cap on the maximum permitted emissions should increase from 1.74% to 2.2% after 2020), whilst the non-ETS sector would have to make a corresponding reduction of 30%, which will need to be allocated between Member States in an appropriate way. However, unlike the framework to 2020, the Commission does not propose a higher conditional target ahead of any wider international agreement, suggesting that, if a more ambitious EU target is warranted, this could be achieved by access to international credits.

Renewable energy target

2.6 The Commission says that a transition to a more sustainable energy system will not be possible without a significantly higher share for renewable energy, but that its rapid deployment already poses challenges, particularly for electricity systems, which need to adapt to increasingly decentralised and variable production. It also notes that most development of renewables in the EU is driven by national support schemes which can hinder market integration, and that their rapid deployment can affect the competitiveness of other fundamental energy sources and reduce investment incentives for generation capacity. It suggests that renewable energy must in future be exploited in a way which is market driven as far as possible, but it notes that a 40% greenhouse gas reduction target should by itself encourage a greater share of renewable energy in the EU of 27%, and it proposes therefore that this should be the EU's target. However, whilst the target would be binding on the EU, the Commission believes that this should not be the case for individual Member States, but should instead be achieved through clear commitments determined by the Member States themselves, guided by the EU target and by what each can deliver in relation to its target for 2020, including its specific circumstances, energy mix and production capacity.

2.7 The Commission also says that it is not appropriate to establish new targets after 2020 for renewable energy or the greenhouse gas intensity of fuels used in transport (or any other sub-sector), and that it has already indicated[9] that food-based biofuels should no longer receive public support after 2020. It notes that, building on its Transport White Paper, a mix of policy measures is needed for 2030 and beyond, including a focus on steps such as improving the efficiency of the transport system, the development of electric vehicles and alternative, sustainable fuels, in line with the alternative fuels strategy.[10] However, the Commission also says that greater flexibility for Member States must be combined with an increased emphasis on completing the internal energy market, and based on a new governance framework under which each Member State would produce a national plan indicating how its commitment to renewable energy would be delivered. It also points out that this will require a substantial revision after 2020 in the Directive on renewable energy sources, as well as an improved policy on biomass in order to maximise its resource efficient use.

Energy efficiency

2.8 The Commission comments that there is broad political consensus on the importance of improved energy efficiency, noting also that the EU target is not binding, with progress being delivered by specific policy measures at Union and national levels. However, it points out that the Energy Efficiency Directive takes a more holistic approach, and says that an assessment in mid 2014 will look at progress towards meeting the 2020 target (where a shortfall is currently predicted), following which it will consider whether any amendments to the Directive are needed. In the meantime, it says that the analysis underpinning this Communication shows that achieving a 40% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 would require an increased level of energy savings of about 25%, with a significant increase required in areas such as housing, transport other than passenger vehicles, and electrical equipment, and with national efforts being complemented by ambitious EU-wide energy efficiency standards.

Emissions Trading System

2.9 The Commission recalls that its 2012 report[11] on the functioning of the carbon market noted that, as a result of the downturn in economic activity during the crisis, a surplus of allowances had accumulated, and that it has recently been agreed that the auctioning of 900 million allowances should be postponed until 2019 and 2020. However, it says that, despite this, a structural surplus will remain well into the period after 2020, even if the cap is tightened to meet a 40% target, thereby eroding the effectiveness of the ETS (which it is generally agreed should remain the central instrument to bring about a transition to a low carbon economy). It says that it has therefore put forward, in parallel with this Communication, a proposal[12] for the establishment of a market stability reserve, providing an automatic adjustment after 2020 of the supply of auctioned allowances based on a pre-defined set of rules.

Competition in integrated markets

2.10 The Commission says that the completion of the internal energy market remains an immediate priority, and it notes that it recently adopted guidelines[13] on public intervention in electricity markets to minimise distortions. It adds that state aid guidelines for energy and environment also need to evolve, with subsidies for mature technologies, including those for renewable energy, being phased out entirely between 2020 and 2030, and it says that it is currently consulting on a revision to those guidelines. The Commission also points out that the internal energy market, together with increased electricity from wind and solar sources, has exerted a downward pressure on wholesale prices, although retail prices have increased as the costs of support schemes are passed onto consumers, with the retail sector also being characterised by high levels of market concentration and price regulation, effectively limiting competition and consumer choice. It therefore stresses that high levels of competition in the internal market will be pivotal in delivering the EU's energy policy objectives up to 2030, and it says that it will continue to monitor the concentration on the retail and wholesale markets, and to ensure effective antitrust and merger control.

Affordable energy for consumers

2.11 The Commission notes the importance of energy in terms of affecting industrial competitiveness and the purchasing power of households, and it highlights the recent increase in the price gap between the EU and many major economic partners, notably with the availability of shale gas in the US. It says that there is a risk of energy price disparities shifting global trade patterns for certain industries, unless compensated by improvements in energy efficiency, where many manufacturers have sought to achieve sustained improvements in energy intensity and to focus on products with a higher added value. It also points out that an analysis[14] of energy prices and costs published alongside this Communication shows that, although this varies from sector to sector, improved energy efficiency means that there has been little impact on the EU's relative competitiveness directly attributable to higher energy prices and the carbon price under the ETS, and that current policies to prevent carbon leakage[15] under the System have also been successful. On the other hand, it says that all future scenarios suggest an upward pressure on EU energy costs, and that it would therefore be prudent to maintain until the end of trading in Phase III of the ETS the existing policy framework for the sectors most at risk of carbon leakage, and to continue to monitor the situation.

Security of energy supply

2.12 The Commission comments that the International Energy Agency projects an increased EU reliance on imported oil from around 80% at present to more than 95% by 2035, with gas import dependency expected to rise from 60% to more than 80%, and it says that, with sustained high commodity prices, this increases the EU's vulnerability to supply and energy price shocks. It suggests that EU policy to improve security of supply must involve the further exploitation of sustainable indigenous energy sources, including renewables, conventional and unconventional fossil fuels, and nuclear energy; collective action by Member States to diversify their supply countries and routes for imported fossil fuels; and greater efforts to improve energy intensity, and to generate savings from buildings, products and processes.

EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE

2.13 The Commission says that increased Member State flexibility in choosing policies which best suit them must be compatible with further market integration, increased competition, and the attainment of EU level climate and energy objectives through Member States' national plans which also provide greater coherence of approach, promote further market integration and competition, and provide certainty for investors. It adds that these plans should also set out a clear approach to achieving objectives relating to greenhouse gas emissions in the non-ETS sector, renewable energy, energy savings, energy security, research and innovation, and other important choices such as nuclear energy, shale gas, carbon capture and storage. It also envisages this would involve the development of detailed guidance by the Commission, followed by the preparation of plans, and their subsequent assessment.

2.14 However, the Commission says that systematic monitoring of key indicators is needed to assess progress and to inform any future policy. This includes the energy price differential between the EU and major trading partners, diversification of energy imports and the share of indigenous energy sources; deployment of smart grids and interconnections between Member States; intra-EU coupling of energy markets; competition and market concentration; and technological innovation.

KEY COMPLEMENTARY POLICIES

2.15 These include:

Transport

The Commission recalls that the Transport White Paper[16] established the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the sector by 60% by 2050 compared with 1990, and by about 20% by 2020 compared with 2008. It also notes that emissions increased by 33% between 1990 and 2007, but have since fallen back — a trend it expects to continue up to 2020, after which it believes that greater efforts will be needed to achieve the targets in the White Paper. It adds that the further reduction of emissions will require a gradual transformation of the public transport system towards better integration between modes, greater exploitation of non-road alternatives, improved management of traffic flows, and extensive innovative in, and deployment of, new propulsion and navigation technologies and alternative fuels, supported by coherent infrastructure design and smarter pricing of infrastructure usage, with Member States also considering how fuel and vehicle taxation could be used to support greenhouse gas reductions. It believes that the EU should participate actively within the International Civil Aviation Organisation to create by 2016 a global market-based mechanism in the aviation sector, and that maritime emissions should be integrated into the EU's greenhouse gas reduction policies, with the EU working with the International Maritime Organisation on a global approach.

Agriculture and land use

The Commission says that agriculture, land use change and forestry both emit and remove greenhouse gases, and that these are currently treated in different parts of the EU's climate policy, with non-carbon dioxide emissions from agriculture being covered in the Effort Sharing Decision, whilst carbon dioxide emissions related to land-use and forestry are excluded from the EU's domestic reduction target, but accounted for under international commitments. It considers that land use change and forestry should be included in the reduction target for 2030, with further analysis being undertaken to assess the mitigation potential and most appropriate policy approach.

Carbon capture and storage

The Commission says that emissions must come down significantly to be compatible with the EU's long term greenhouse gas objective, and that, as theoretical limits of efficiency are being reached in some sectors, carbon capture and storage may be the only option available to reduce direct emissions on the scale needed in the longer term, and may in particular be a key technology for fossil fuel-based power generation. It considers that increased research and commercial demonstration are essential to enable the technology to be deployed within the 2030 timeframe, requiring a supportive EU framework through the continued and strengthened use of auctioning revenues.

Innovation and finance

The Commission says that the Strategic Energy Technology Plan has increased research and development investment across the EU from €3.2 to €5.4 billion a year, and that, under Horizon 2020, a new Union programme for 2014-20, close to €6 billion will be dedicated to energy efficiency and to secure, clean and low carbon technologies. However, it says that the EU will need to step up its research efforts to support the post-2020 climate and energy framework, and that consideration should now be given to how best to do this, and what the priorities should be, for example by using revenues generated by the ETS to accelerate the market uptake of low carbon technologies and greenhouse gas mitigation measures, by leveraging greater private investment via the European Investment Bank, and by drawing on the €23 billion earmarked under the European Structural and Investment Funds for 2014-20 to facilitate a shift to a low carbon economy.

INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT

2.16 The Communication notes that global energy demand will increase in the period to 2030, with much of this being met through the use of fossil fuels, but it says that international efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are mixed, in that, although China, India, Brazil, the USA, the EU and more than 100 countries (together accounting for 80% of global emissions) pledged to reduce emissions in the Copenhagen-Cancun process, planned climate change mitigation efforts are still short of what is necessary to limit the expected rise global temperature. Consequently, Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) launched a process in 2011 to conclude a new international agreement in Paris in December 2015, which would be applicable to all Parties and cover the period after 2020. The Commission notes that the EU and other developed regions will need to show ambition in their climate mitigation plans if they are to encourage less-developed regions to make serious efforts, and it points out that, as the EU is currently a global leader in low carbon technologies, an ambitious global approach to climate and energy policy would allow it to exploit its advantage in those markets.

2.17 The Commission concludes by inviting the Council and the European Parliament to endorse a 40% greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and an EU level renewables target of at least 27%, in order to feed into UNFCCC negotiations which will take place throughout 2015. It also asks for endorsement of its proposed new governance system.

The Government's view

2.18 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 19 February 2014, the Minister of State for Energy and Climate Change (Gregory Barker) says that the Government will examine carefully the subsidiarity implications of any more detailed proposals on the 2030 climate and energy framework, including the process for preparing Member State national plans, but, in the meantime, it supports the 40% emissions reduction target proposed by the Commission. However, it considers that the EU should be prepared to offer to commit to a 50% emissions reduction target in the context of an ambitious global climate deal, which it believes is required to remain on the cost-effective pathway necessary to limit the increase in the average global temperature to 2° centigrade.

2.19 As regards specific aspects of the Communication, the Minister says that:

·  whilst the Government will examine the proposals for an EU-level renewables target of 27%, it opposes binding targets for Member States, and thus welcomes the explicit statement that the 27% target would not be binding on Member States individually, believing that they must retain maximum flexibility in choosing the energy mix most appropriate to their circumstances if they are to decarbonise in the most cost-effective way possible;

·  the ETS is a central component of the UK's policy for delivering cost effective emissions reductions in the UK and across the EU and for fostering the transition to a low carbon EU economy in a technology neutral manner, and the Government has called for urgent reforms to address the surplus of allowances in the ETS and strengthen the incentive which it provides for investment in low-carbon technology;

·  whilst the factor by which the EU-wide ETS emissions cap is reduced annually will need to be increased to meet the 2030 targets, this alone will not be sufficient to ensure the level of EU decarbonisation necessary to limit global temperature increases, and the Government therefore broadly welcomes the Commission's proposals for ETS reform: it also open to considering the potential for a market stability reserve, but continues to call for the permanent removal from the system, or cancellation, of an ambitious volume of allowances as the simplest and clearest way to address the surplus;

·  the Government welcomes the potential simplification and streamlining of the currently separate processes for reporting action on renewable energy, energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction, and believes that the proposed new governance processes could increase investor certainty, enhance policy coherence and transparency, reduce costs and foster progress towards completion of the internal energy market: it also points out that there are links between the proposed new reporting processes and those under the European Semester, and will seek to prevent duplication of efforts.

2.20 The Minister says that there will be an exchange of views on these proposals at the Energy and Environment Councils in March and at the European Council meeting that month, and he notes Commission's suggestion the Council should endorse its proposals by the end of the year.

Conclusion

2.21 This wide-ranging Communication clearly addresses a subject of considerable political, environmental and economic importance, and, whilst it envisages a somewhat greater degree of freedom than at present for Member States in certain areas, it nevertheless identifies a wide range of issues on which views will need to be taken at both EU and national levels. In view of this, we think its early consideration by the House would be highly desirable, and we are therefore recommending it for debate in European Committee A (alongside a Commission Communication and Recommendation on High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking) in the EU, considered at chapter 3 of this Report).


6   (34814) 8096/13: see HC 83-i (2013-14), chapter 5 (8 May 2013) and HC 83-viii (2013-14), chapter 2 (3 July 2013). Back

7   (32592) 7505/11: see HC 428-xxiii (2010-12), chapter 8 (5 April 2011) and (33563) 18597/11: see HC 428-xlix (2010-12), chapter 14 (1 December 2012). Back

8   (35749) 5489/14: see chapter 1 of this Report. Back

9   (34342) 15189/12: see HC 86-xxi (2012-13), chapter 8 (28 November 2012) and HC 83-xxiii (2013-14), chapter 14 (4 December 2013). Back

10   (34647) 5736/13: see HC 86-xxxiv (2012-13), chapter 3 (6 March 2013), HC 86-xxi (2012-13), chapter 8 (20 November 2012) and HC 83-xxiii (2013-14), chapter 15 (4 December 2013). Back

11   (34430) 16537/12: see HC 86-xxv (2012-13), chapter 14 (19 December 2012). Back

12   (35755) 5644/14: see chapter 5 of this Report. Back

13   (35531) 15776/13: see HC 83-xxviii (2013-14), chapter 9 (22 January 2014). Back

14   (35750) 5599/14: see chapter 15 of this Report. Back

15   This arises when, as a result of the cost of climate policies, businesses transfer production to areas with less severe constraints, leading to an increase in their total emissions. Back

16   (32639) 8333/11: see HC 428-xxvi (2010-12), chapter 3 (11 May 2011). Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 11 March 2014