The work of the UK Border Agency (October-December 2012) - Home Affairs Committee Contents


4  Key indicators of the Agency's performance

38.  The Committee assesses the Agency's performance on a quarterly basis against a number of key indicators covering the major aspects of its work. This list is not definitive and the committee may decide, as and when new issues arise, to add further indicators:

  • Foreign national offenders
  • The asylum and immigration backlog: live casework
  • New asylum cases
  • Immigration
  • Immigration detention
  • Appeals and tribunals
  • Sponsors and licensing
  • Enforcement action
  • Migration Refusal Pool
  • Intelligence
  • Departmental information and cooperation with Parliament

Ex-Foreign National Offenders
Ex-FNOS released without being considered for deportation

No significant change:

  • 47 of the ex-FNOs released without being considered for deportation in 2006 remained untraced at the end of Q4 2012, the same as in the previous quarter.
  • Four additional ex-FNOs from the 2006 cohort were removed from the UK in Q4 2012, taking the total to 409.
  • Three of the 28 ex-FNOs released without being considered for deportation in 2011 remain untraced.
  • One ex-FNOs was released without being considered for deportation in 2012.

Ex-FNOs living in the community

  • Worse performance: 4,102 ex-FNOs were living in the community whilst awaiting deportation in Q4 2012, an increase of 122 on Q3 2012. 65% of these cases are over two years old.

Removals in this quarter

  • No significant change: 362 ex-FNOs eligible for deportation were released in Q4 2012, 95% of their cases were outstanding at the end of Q4 2012. This is similar to Q3 2012 when 340 ex-FNOs were released with 95% of cases outstanding at the end of the quarter.
  • Improved performance: Of the ex-FNOs whose deportation cases were outstanding, 143 were delayed because their cases were still being concluded by the UKBA. This is a fall of 32% from Q3 2012.
  • Worse performance: 127 days was the average length of time it took to deport an ex-FNO in Q4 2012, an increase of 9 days from the previous quarter.
  • Worse performance: There were 208 failed removals in Q4 2012, 15% of the total number of removals. This is an deterioration from Q3 2012 when there were 165 failed removals.
  • No significant change: 42% of removals were carried out during the Early Release Scheme period in Q4 2012 compared with 45% in Q3 2012.
  • No significant change: 36% of removals were carried out under the Facilitated Returns Scheme in Q4 2012 compared with 38% in Q3 2012.

KEY ISSUE: TACKLING THE BACKLOG OF EX-FNOS LIVING IN THE COMMUNITY

39.  Although the Agency has continued to make slow progress in removing the 2006 cohort of foreign prisoners, we are concerned that the number of foreign national ex-offenders living in the community rose by 122 in the final quarter of 2012. The length of time taken to deport an ex-FNO has also increased by nine days. These problems must not be allowed to go unchecked.

Asylum and immigration backlog: live casework
Asylum backlog
  • 33,500 backlog asylum applications were being caseworked by the Agency in Q4 2012.
  • At the end of Q4 2012, 55% of all legacy asylum applications concluded to date had been granted leave to remain and 27% of applicants were removed. 17% of applications were found to be duplicates.

Immigration backlog

  • 7,000 backlog migration cases were being caseworked by the Agency in Q4 2012.

  • At the end of Q4 2012, 46% of all legacy migration cases concluded to date had been granted leave to remain and 33% of applicants had been removed. 21% of cases were found to be duplicates.

KEY ISSUE: PRIORITISING THE CONCLUSION OF LEGACY CASEWORK

40.  The asylum and migration backlog is made up of "live" cases, where the Agency has established contact with people who were previously untraceable. The number of asylum and immigration backlog casework has grown steadily throughout the year, this is to be expected as the Agency began to properly implement its tracing programme in this period. When the controlled archives closed the Agency had 33,900 backlog asylum cases and 7,000 backlog immigration cases that it needs to conclude. Most of the individuals concerned will have waited many years to find out the result of their applications. We reiterate our recommendation that the Home Office must now prioritise the conclusion of their cases and work fast to give them a swift decision. As we have pointed out in evidence sessions, it would be easier to understand the nature of the very substantial backlog and legacy cases if a host of different designations were not used for the numbers involved.

New asylum cases

Initial decisions and conclusions

  • Worse performance: 12,816 asylum cases were awaiting an initial decision at the end of Q4 2012 a 17% increase on the previous quarter.
  • Worse performance: There was a 18% rise on the quarter in the number of asylum cases awaiting an initial decision for more than 6 months.
  • No significant change 61% of asylum cases were concluded within one year in Q4, down from 64% on the previous quarter.

Applicants previously removed from the UK

  • Ten individuals were removed from the UK and subsequently granted refugee status or humanitarian protection in Q4 2012. The individuals were nationals of Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Iran, Iraq and Pakistan.

KEY ISSUE: A GROWING BACKLOG OF CASES PENDING AN INITIAL DECISION FOR MORE THAN 6 MONTHS

41.  We are concerned to see yet another increase this quarter in the number of asylum cases waiting more than six months for an initial decision. The time taken to process asylum applications is an issue which we are considering in more detail in our inquiry into asylum.

Immigration

Number of visas issued and grants for settlement

  • There were 222,935 visas issued in 2012, a decline of 2% in the number of visas issued in 2011.
  • There were 126,891 grants of settlement in 2012, a decline for 24% in the number of grants for settlement in 2011.
  • There were 278,176 study visas[20] issued in 2012, a decline of 14% in the number of study visas issued in 2011.

Processing of in-country immigration cases

The Agency's targets are to process 90% of Tier 1, 2 and 5 and 85% of Tier 4 in-country postal applications within four weeks.

  • New backlog: 190,000 cases in the permanent and temporary migration pool.
  • New backlog: Only 10% of Tier 1 applications were processed on time in Q4 2012, a decline from 18% in the previous quarter.
  • 21% of Tier 4 application were processed on time in Q4 2012, an increase from 14% in the previous quarter.
  • 86% of Tier 2 and 79% of Tier 5 applications were processed on time in Q4 2012, an increase from 79% and 71% respectively in the previous quarter.
  • New backlog: 61,103 in-country immigration applications had not been loaded onto the Agency's Case Information Database (CID) at the end of Q4 2012, an increase of 4% from the previous quarter.

Processing of out of country immigration cases

  • Improved performance: The Agency met its processing targets for out-of-country visa applications in all four tiers in Q4 2012. 100% of visas tiers were processed within its final 60 day target time.

KEY ISSUE: BACKLOG OF IN-COUNTRY IMMIGRATION APPLICATIONS

42.  We have documented the Agency's shocking level of customer service in our previous reports on its work. Although processing of applications in Tiers 2, 4 and 5 has improved in this quarter, there has been a further decline , from 18% to just 10%, in the number of Tier 1 applications processed on time. Just one in ten Tier 1 visa applications is processed within the Agency's service standard time. When Sarah Rapson gave evidence to us recently, she emphasised the need for UK Visas and Immigration to adopt a more customer-focused approach to its work. That is clearly something that is urgently required and we hope that the re-organisation of immigration and visa services will provide the framework in which it can happen. But nobody in the Home Office should be under any illusion that the re-organisation will in and of itself deliver service improvements.

43.  On the 15 April 2013, Channel 4 broadcast an episode of Dispatches entitled 'Immigration Undercover', which featured undercover journalists who had infiltrated the former UK Border Agency. The programme revealed that, 18 days before the 31 March deadline to clear the family migration backlog, the UKBA had split the family applications into four categories, designated A, B, C and D. The A, B and C backlogs, each of which consisted of fewer than 10,000, relatively simple cases, were cleared. But backlog D, which consisted of 50,356 complex cases, was not cleared. We are concerned that the Home Office is using 'backlog splitting' to disguise the full extent of the backlog and the lack of progress made in clearing it. The Home Office must be transparent about the number of cases remaining in the backlogs. There were also other allegations of figures relating to visa applications being massaged by the Agency. The Home Office must investigate immediately to see if this is still the case.

44.  We were alarmed to discover in Sarah Rapson's evidence session a further backlog of 190,000 cases in the temporary and permanent migration pool that were never revealed to the Committee before. The total figure for the number of cases in the backlog has reached over half a million (502,462). Whilst we welcome this admission from Ms Rapson and hope she is more forthcoming with this Committee then her predecessor, it is simply unacceptable that new backlogs are routinely revealed in Committee evidence sessions.

45.  Ms Rapson must make it a priority to be aware of all the backlogs that there are, and to inform us promptly of them all. If UK Visas and Immigration is truly committed to full transparency and accountability they must be upfront about the total number of cases awaiting resolution. Only when this is done will the Home Office be better able to proportion the appropriate resources to tackle this issue. In Rob Whiteman's letter of 7 May 2013 to the Chair he said: "As at 31 December 2012 there were 85,833 cases in progress across temporary migration as well as 48,857 cases not yet put on the system to give a total of 134,690 cases in progress overall. I can confirm that as at 31 March 2012 this figure has been reduced to 105,167 cases, with the number of uninput cases at 1,073".

46.  There was no mention of the number of cases in progress across permanent migration. We are concerned that Mr Whiteman has not been as open with the Committee as he should have been. These figures show an increase of 18,261 cases in progress despite the reduction in cases waiting to be put on the system. The Committee are concerned that the organisation simply does not have enough resources to deal with the backlog of cases. The Home Office must clarify the total number of cases in the temporary and permanent migration pool, exactly what these cases are and the maximum length of time that cases in this backlog have been outstanding. We also expect to have a complete listing for each immigration category of how many applications have been made, how many have not yet been processed, and how many have not been completed within the advertised service standard.

Immigration detention
Rule 35 reports
  • Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules states that medical practitioners are required to report to the Agency any detainee whose health is likely to be injuriously affected by detention or any condition of detention and any detainee they are concerned may be a victim of torture.
  • 354 reports were made under Rule 35 to the Agency in Q4 2012, an Increase of 53% from Q3 2012. Thirty-nine reports (11%) resulted in the individual in question being released. This is an increase on the previous quarter when 6% of reports resulted in the individual being released.

Child detention

  • Worse performance: 61 children entered immigration detention in Q4 2012, a rise from 48 the previous quarter.
  • Improved performance: 59 children left immigration detention in Q3 2012. 92% of those detained had been held for 3 days or less, an improvement from 87% on the previous quarter.

Appeals and tribunals[21]
Appeals Improvement Plan: progress against targets

Border Agency to represent at 90% of appeals

  • Improved performance: An Agency representative was present at 94% of all appeal hearings in Q4 2012, a rise from 87% on the previous quarter.

90% of bundles to be received by the court by the prescribed date

  • Unacceptable performance: 75% of cases bundles were delivered to the court on time by the Agency in Q3 2012, a rise from 66% in the previous quarter.

Sponsors and licensing
New sponsor applications
  • 1,912 new sponsorship applications were made in Q4 2012, 1,748 for Tier 2, 59 for Tier 4 and 105 for Tier 5.[22]
  • The average length of time it took to process a sponsor application in Q4 2012 was 14 days, a decline from 41 days in the previous quarter. 1,766 applicants took longer than the average length to process.

Follow up visits

Worse performance:

  • 34% of follow up visits to Tier 2 sponsors were unannounced in Q4 2012 an increase from 31% in the previous quarter.
  • 53% of follow up visits to Tier 4 sponsors were unannounced in Q4 2012 an increase from 30% in the previous quarter.
  • 11% of follow up visits to Tier 5 sponsors were unannounced in Q4 2012, the same proportion as in the previous quarter.

Departmental information and cooperation with Parliament

Departmental information

  • 13,302 FTE equivalent staff were working for the Agency in Q4 2012.
  • The Agency spent £572,500 on external consultants in Q4 2012.

Cooperation with Parliament

No significant change:

  • The Agency responded to 84% of MPs' emails within 20 working days in Q4 2012. This fell 11 percentage points short of their target.
  • The Agency resolved 56% of queries made via their MP's Inquiry Line within 10 working days. This fell 34 percentage points short of their target.
  • The Agency's response to this Committee's data request for Q4 2012 arrived on time.

47.  The Committee were deeply concerned to discover that the spending on external consultants in Q4 had increased by a factor of 20 on Q3, a rise from £27,000 to over £500,000. The use of external consultants has been actively discouraged across Whitehall as spending cuts take their toll on budgets. We expect the Home Office to clarify why this huge increase has occurred. We recommend that the Home Office has sensible controls on the use of such consultants.

48.  The Committee are concerned that the organisation has missed its targets on responses to MPs queries. Constituents and MPs simply want to know where they stand and it should not take so long to answer such requests. Ultimately this leads to much of the ill-feeling directed at UK Visas and Immigration. If a more detailed and quicker response was sent constituents and MPs would make less representations therefore reducing the workload of the service. We have seen anecdotal evidence that the responses given by the MPs Inquiry Line are below standard and lacking in information. The Committee feel that resources should be concentrated with the MP Account Managers and urge the Home Office to reconsider the merit of the Inquiry Line. In addition, solicitors frequently complain they are unable to get replies, or have to wait a very long time, before receiving a response on immigration cases. It is partly for this reason that solicitors request Members of Parliament to write to the authorities on behalf of constituents. Moreover, MPs themselves continue to experience long delays in receiving replies from the UK Border Agency.

Border Agency Backlogs
No. of cases

Q3
No. of cases

Q4
Difference
% Increase or decrease since Q3 2012[23]
'Live' asylum cohort
28,500
33,500
5,000
18%
Asylum controlled archive
0
0
0
-
Live immigration cases
4,000
7,000
3,000
75%
Immigration controlled archive
0
0
0
-
FNOs living in the community
3,980
4,102
122
3%
FNOs - untraced
47
47
0
0
Migration refusal pool
181,541
190,615
9,074
5%
FLTR applications not processed within targets
28,558
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
No. of cases still to be loaded on CID
59,000
61,103
2,103
4%
FLTR on the basis of marriage or civil partnership - cases pending review
14,000
14,000
0
0
FLTR on basis of marriage or civil partnership - cases pending initial decision
2,100
2,100
0
0
Temporary and permanent migration pool
Unknown
190,000
190,000
Unknown
Total 321,726
502,467



20   Study visas include student visas for main applicants and dependents plus visas for student visitors Back

21   Figures relate to First Tier Tribunal cases Back

22   Not all applications for sponsor status in Tier 4 are for new licences, the figure also includes reinstatements. Back

23   Bold indicates worse performance Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2013
Prepared 13 July 2013