1 Introduction
1. In 2012, the G8 launched a New Alliance for Food
Security and Nutrition, an alliance of G8 countries, developing
country governments and private companies. Over 60 companies are
involved, half of which are African; total commitments from business
are over $4 billion. The New Alliance aims to invest in countries
which use reforms to promote investment and agricultural activity.[1]
2. The G8 will return to the subject during the UK's
Presidency in 2013. As well as hosting the G8 summit on 17-18
June,[2] on 8 June the
UK will host an event called "Nutrition for Growth: Beating
hunger through nutrition and science".[3]
Concurrently a large-scale campaign ("Enough Food for Everyone
IF") is being run by over 200 UK- and Ireland-based NGOs.[4]
In a specially-recorded message to coincide with the launch of
the campaign, the Prime Minister stated that:
Nearly a billion people around the world do not
get enough food. And undernutrition holds back the growth and
development of millions of children.
This is simply not acceptable in 2013.
That's why I welcome the NGO campaign on food.
I know that this is an issue which people up and down the country
feel strongly about and will be campaigning on this year. I'm
determined that this Coalition Government will listen to their
passion and lead the world.[5]
3. According to the website of the UN Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO), "Food security exists when all people,
at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient,
safe and nutritious food which meets their dietary needs and food
preferences for an active and healthy life."[6]
Food insecurity (the lack of such conditions) is one of the defining
issues of our times. Across the world almost 870 million people
suffer from hunger.[7]
The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) included a target to reduce
the number of people suffering from hunger by half between 1990
and 2015,[8] and we anticipate
that hunger will also feature in the post-2015 development goals
when the MDGs expire. While progress against the MDG target on
hunger has been better than some feared, this progress has been
achieved largely in East Asia and Latin America: progress is lagging
in South Asia, Western Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.[9]
4. For important crops such as rice, wheat, maize
and soybeans, yield growth rates have slowed globally. The decline
in yield growth rates has been observed in both developed and
developing countries.[10]
Overfishing also poses a serious problem: fish stocks are under
strain from fishing which is either poorly regulated, unregulated
or simply illegal. It has been suggested that all species of seafood
which are currently fished will be extinct by 2048.[11]
5. At the African Union summit in July 2003, African
leaders signed the Maputo Declaration, committing their governments
to spending 10% of national budgets on agriculture, and achieving
6% annual growth rates in agriculture by 2008.[12]
Yet in a study of African countries conducted by ONE, an NGO,
nine of the 19 countries studied were found to have reduced their
agriculture budgets since the signing of the Maputo Declaration.
Only four of the 19 countries had met the 10% target, with another
two close behind.[13]
Donor funding for agriculture has shown a slight increase in recent
years, but the historical trend is one of decline.[14]
In its written evidence, ONE reports that donor funding for agriculture
fell by 72% between 1988 and 2003.[15]
Throughout this period NGOs played in valuable role in providing
much-needed support to smallholder farmers.[16]
6. Box 1 illustrates the various ways in which DFID
works on food security through its bilateral programmes.
Box 1
DFID's bilateral work on food security
|
There are three main strands to DFID's bilateral work on food security:
- Supporting the provision of public goods (e.g. infrastructure; research) and an 'enabling environment' for the agricultural sector, including work on land tenure reform;
- Supporting smallholders who may not otherwise be commercially viable, through work on resilience, diversification and social protection;
- Supporting the integration of smallholders into markets and value chains, e.g. by helping smallholder co-operatives to access credit and agricultural inputs.
|
Source: adapted
from Ev 102
7. There are a number of major international institutions
and initiatives working on food security. Box 2 provides details
of these.
Box 2
Key institutions and initiatives
|
UN World Food Programme (WFP): WFP focuses on humanitarian assistance, with two-thirds of its budget used for humanitarian purposes. In 2012, the UK was the fourth-largest contributor to WFP, providing over £126 million. Most of the UK's contribution to WFP (84%) was for specific projects. The UK has recently begun providing some of its funding on a multi-year basis. The UK sometimes provides in-kind contributions to WFP, and DFID also provides a 'core' contribution, having agreed to provide £100 million over a four-year period.
UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): FAO offers policy advice, both at country level and global level, and co-ordinates the negotiation of relevant international standards and treaties. It leads the UN's humanitarian agriculture cluster, and will co-lead the food security cluster. The UK provides 'core' funding to FAO, making it FAO's fifrh-largest contributor. The UK also provides project-specific funding which is used for policy work, work on livelihoods (including livestock), emergency and rehabilitation work, and longer-term development work.
UN International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD): IFAD provides loans and grants to approximately 119 national governments, for work in rural areas. These loans and grants are used to fund work in rural areas, including projects on capacity building; female empowerment; yield improvement; smallholder adaptation to climate change; and natural resource management. The UK was the largest contributor to the most recent replenishment of IFAD. DFID has also made a specific contribution to IFAD's Adaptation for Smallholder Agriculture Programme (ASAP), to which it is the largest contributor.
Zero Hunger Challenge: This was launched by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon at the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in June 2012. It aims to ensure sufficient food for all throughout the year.
UN Committee on World Food Security (CFS): The CFS seeks to facilitate co-operation between governments, international organisations, the private sector and civil society organisations (CSOs). Its functions are as follows:
· Co-ordination - initially at global level, but subsequently also at regional and national levels;
· Policy convergence;
· Support and advice to national governments and regional organisations;
· Development of monitoring, so as to facilitate accountability and sharing of best practice.
|
Source: adapted
from Qq 69, 105; Ev 61, 84, 90, 100-101; Ev w46; DFID, Multilateral
Aid Review, March 2011, pp 173, 183, 205.
Our inquiry
8. As
a Committee, we recognise that the issue of food security is fundamental
to international development. We produced a report on this area
during the last Parliament, looking specifically at the work of
the World Food Programme (WFP).[17]
Given the increasing focus on food security during the UK's G8
Presidency, we feel that this is an opportune time to return to
the issue. In this inquiry we consider what steps DFID could take
to improve global food security, while also considering broader
issues affecting the global food system. Some of the issues we
cover also feature in recent reports by other Committees, including
the Environmental Audit Committee's report on "Sustainable
Food"[18] and the
Energy and Climate Change Committee's report on "The road
to UNFCC COP 18 and beyond".[19]
9. Our report begins (Chapter 2) with a detailed
examination of the long-term factors affecting demand for and
supply of food. In Chapter 3, we consider how these factors, together
with more short-term policy decisions such as export bans, have
contributed to recent food price "shocks" or "spikes",
and how to reduce the magnitude of these shocks. Finally, in Chapter
4, we consider how best to protect the most vulnerable when shocks
occur.
10. We received 40 pieces of written evidence from
a wide range of individuals and organisations including academics,
corporations and NGOs. We
also held three oral evidence sessions. Witnesses at the oral
sessions included Lynne Featherstone MP, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary
of State for International Development; Norman Baker MP, the Parliamentary
Under-Secretary of State for Transport; and representatives of
WFP, FAO, the International Fund for Agricultural Development
(IFAD), the Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), the
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Government
Office for Science. In support of this inquiry we visited Ethiopia,
a country which has endured well-documented challenges related
to food security in the past, but which has made considerable
progress in recent years. We spent time in Amhara and Benishangul-Gumuz
states as well as in Addis Ababa. Finally, we are grateful to
Rob Bailey of Chatham House for serving as our Specialist Adviser
in this inquiry.
1 Ev w111 Back
2
"UK Presidency of G8 2013", Inside Government,
www.gov.uk Back
3
Ev 107 Back
4
"Who we are", Enough Food for Everyone IF, enoughfoodif.org Back
5
"David Cameron's message to anti-hunger IF campaign",
Inside Government, 23 January 2013, www.gov.uk Back
6
"Food security statistics", Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations, www.fao.org Back
7
UN FAO, The State of Food Insecurity in the World, 2012,
p 8 Back
8
Official list of MDG indicators, effective 15 January 2008, www.un.org Back
9
Ev 59 Back
10
UN FAO, Investing in Agriculture for a Better Future: The State
of Food and Agriculture 2012, p 105 Back
11
Bernice Lee et al, Resources Futures (Chatham House, 2012),
p 29 Back
12
Ev w111 Back
13
Ev w112 Back
14
Ev 65 Back
15
Ev w111 Back
16
"Supporting smallholders in securing global food security",
Tearfund, 10 August 2012, www.tearfund.org Back
17
International Development Committee, Sixth Report of Session 2006-07,
Sanitation and Water, HC 493-I Back
18
Environmental Audit Committee, Eleventh Report of Session 2010-12,
Sustainable Food, HC 879 Back
19
Energy and Climate Change Committee, Second Report of Session
2012-13, The road to UNFCC COP 18 and beyond, HC 88 Back
|