Democracy and Development in Burma - International Development Committee Contents


5  Education

149. Burma's education system has suffered from decades of underinvestment. Currently only 54% of children who enrol complete primary schooling (31% from the poorest households[176]) and few Burmese have higher level education.[177]

150. Save the Children highlighted the importance of education in Burma:

    Myanmar has a young population. This is an opportunity to invest in the next generation.[178]

Foreign investors in Burma could be deterred by a work force with poor language and numerical skills, very little higher education and few qualified professionals. We heard in relation to health, just building up local services in townships was proving difficult as there was no one for example with financial management skills to receive funds and allocate them for services.[179]

151. The Burmese Government has ambitious plans to reform education. Inevitably, it is theoretical at present, but it does recognise the need for major reforms. On our visit we discussed the curriculum which we were told was heavily based on rote learning and required reform. The need for DFID's help training teachers and in-service training was stressed. The British Council had been asked to assist with training teachers, and we recommend that it do so.

152. DFID contributes the majority of its funding to education through The Multi Donor Education Fund (MDEF), managed by UNICEF, which works to improve policy, access, equity, quality and management in schooling. DFID is on the MDEF Steering Committee and has committed £6 million up to 2014. DFID also has smaller projects on education policy with a budget of £5.7 million for 2011-12 to 2014-15 and monastic schooling with a budget of £3.9 million for 2011-12 to 2014-15. However this is together a relatively small amount making up 5.4% of its forecast spending for 2011-15 in comparison to its health programme spend of £63.4 million and DFID's education programme in Pakistan which has a budget of £203 million in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, £80 million in Punjab and £39 million in Sindh. The Minister told us:

    the starting point with education is we are doing it on a small scale, so ultimately the resource decisions we are going to have to make might be characterised as double or quits. We either ramp it up to a bigger scale or just appreciate that we are not really going to have an enormous impact.[180]

153. Burma has a unique problem in that the younger generation is less well educated than their parents. There is an urgent need for education not only for children but also adult education and training if the need for teachers, health workers, administrators and private livelihoods is to be met. We recommend that DFID significantly increase spending on education provided DFID receives an overall increase in its total budget and its number of staff in Burma. We further recommend that teacher training be a priority.

Monastic education

154. ActionAid was concerned about DFID's support for monastic education because of the current wave of Buddhist fundamentalism in Burma.[181] It also said:

    The religious institution, whether it is primary level or even higher level, does not bring good results in the long run in any country.[182]

It is essential that religious education is inclusive and we have to make sure it is impartial and not prejudiced.

155. The Head of DFID explained that monastic schools currently taught about 20% of the children in Burma so they could not be ignored by DFID if educational quality in Burma was to be improved. DFID was therefore working with them as well as the Government-run schools to train teachers.[183] While in Burma we visited a monastic school near Mandalay and spoke to the Headmaster; we saw no signs that the school was preaching Buddhist fundamentalism. We also welcome the contribution DFID was making to teacher training.

156. We support DFID's work with monastic schools in raising the quality of education.


176   Save the Children (BUR 0032), para 1.3 Back

177   Department for International Development (BUR 0016), para 8  Back

178   Q 8 Back

179   Q35 Back

180   Q162 Back

181   Q11 Back

182   Q11 Back

183   Q163 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 13 March 2014