Public Accounts CommitteeWritten evidence from the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE
|
(a) |
(b) |
(d) |
(e) |
||||
|
Project |
Description |
Year project initiated |
Years in planning/ |
Estimated cost at initiation |
Estimated cost in performance plan |
Estimated cost as at March 2012 |
Estimated cost as at September 2013 |
|
(£m) |
(£m) |
(£m) |
(£m) |
||||
|
Bulk sludge and fuel |
Provide assets needed to support the export of ponds solids, wet bay solids and sludge |
2004 |
8 |
73-229 |
227 |
233 |
330 |
|
Pile fuel cladding silo3 |
Design and build a new waste retrieval plant |
2005 |
7 |
150-495 |
342 |
341 |
750 |
|
Box encapsulation plant product stores comprehensive import/export facility3 |
Design and build a store with an import/export facility for containerised intermediate-level waste; this project has now been replaced by the Direct Import Facility (DIF) |
2006 |
6 |
108-119 |
277 |
281 |
192 |
|
Silos maintenance facility3 |
Build a high contamination workshop to keep machines functional or permit their replacement during retrieval operations |
2006 |
5 |
49-180 |
165 |
165 |
238 |
|
Highly active liquor storage tanks3 |
Build replacement tanks to hold highly active liquid waste from reprocessing |
2007 |
5 |
83 |
474 |
474 |
474 |
|
Silos direct encapsulation plant 3 |
Build a treatment plant to deal with hazardous legacy waste |
2010 |
2 |
560-669 |
668 |
1,281 |
1,324 |
|
Ponds solid treatment plant technical underpinning |
Complete a series of studies to define solutions for the management of ponds |
2010 |
2 |
29 |
29 |
21 |
21 |
|
Total |
1,052-1,804 |
2,182 |
2,796 |
3,329 |
|||
|
Total (excluding highly active liquor storage tanks) |
969-1,721 |
1,708 |
2,322 |
2,855 |
|||
|
(g) |
(h) |
(i) |
(j) |
|||||||
|
Variance against original upper estimate |
Variance against upper estimate at initiation |
Variance against performance plan estimated cost |
Total spend to March 2012 |
Total spend to September 2013 |
Planned delivery date when initiated |
Planned delivery date in 2011 performance plan |
Estimated delivery date as at March 2012 |
Estimated delivery date as at September 2013 |
Variance against delivery date when initiated |
Variance against delivery date in 2011 performance plan |
|
(£m) |
(%) |
(£m) |
(£m) |
(months) |
(months) |
|||||
|
101 |
44 |
103 |
132 |
186 |
December 2012 |
November 2016 |
November 2016 |
January 2018 |
61 |
14 |
|
255 |
52 |
408 |
117 |
186 |
October 2019 |
August 2017 |
August 2017 |
January 2023 |
39 |
65 |
|
73 |
61 |
-85 |
43 |
60 |
January 2019 |
October 2017 |
October 2017 |
October 2018 |
-3 |
12 |
|
58 |
32 |
73 |
21 |
39 |
October 2011 |
May 2017 |
February 2017 |
February 2018 |
76 |
9 |
|
391 |
471 |
0 |
39 |
44 |
March 2013 |
March 2018 |
Cancelled |
Cancelled |
0 |
0 |
|
655 |
98 |
656 |
207 |
315 |
November 2018 |
June 2017 |
October 2017 |
August 2020 |
21 |
38 |
|
-8 |
-28 |
-8 |
3 |
11 |
March 2015 |
March 2015 |
March 2015 |
Scope moved to other projects 7 |
0 |
0 |
|
1,525 |
85 |
1,147 |
562 |
841 |
194 |
138 |
||||
|
1,134 |
66 |
1,147 |
523 |
797 |
194 |
138 |
PROJECTS IN THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE
|
(a) |
(b) |
(d) |
(e) |
|||
|
Project |
Description |
Date passed design gate |
Estimated cost at design gate |
Estimated cost in performance plan May 2011 |
Estimated cost as at March 2012 |
Estimated cost as at September 2013 |
|
(£m) |
(£m) |
(£m) |
(£m) |
|||
|
Local Sludge Treatment Plant |
Construct storage tanks to hold radioactive sludge and a building to house them with settling plant, utilities and ventilation equipment |
May 20063 |
32 |
63 |
63 |
63 |
|
Buffer Sludge packaging plant1 |
Construct storage capability for radio active sludge until it can be processed into a suitable waste eform for final disposal |
September 20063 |
108 |
202 |
234 |
240 |
|
Encapsulated product store3 |
Construct new store for intermediate-level radioactive waste from reprocessing and future hazard reduction programmes |
October 20063 |
94 |
103 |
103 |
105 |
|
Magnox swarf storage silos retrievals |
Construct equipment and systems that can safely remove radioactive waste from a storage silo |
March 20073 |
243 |
421 |
387 |
729 |
|
Separation area ventilation |
Construct a 120 metre high chimney with associated plant room monitoring room and substation |
August 20083 |
144 |
120 |
138 |
224 |
|
Evaporator D |
Construct a new evaporator to reduce the volume of highly active liquors (a by-product of reprocessing). |
April 2009 |
397 |
398 |
641 |
660 |
|
Box transfer facility |
Construct a tunnel and associated mechanical devices to transport processed waste contained inside of 3m3 boxes |
December 2011 |
148 |
158 |
193 |
189 |
|
Total |
1,166 |
1,465 |
1,759 |
2,210 |
|
(g) |
(h) |
(i) |
(j) |
|||||||
|
Variance against design gate estimate |
Variance against design gate estimate |
Variance against the performance plan estimated cost |
Total spend to March 2012 |
Total spend to September 2013 |
Planned delivery date at design gate |
Planned delivery date in 2011 performance plan |
Estimated delivery date as at March 2012 |
Estimated delivery date as at September 2013 |
Variance against delivery date at design gate |
Variance against delivery date in 2011 performance plan |
|
(£m) |
(%) |
(£m) |
(£m) |
(£m) |
(months) |
(months) |
||||
|
31 |
97 |
0 |
63 |
63 |
March 2008 |
January 2012 |
Delivered March 2012 |
Delivered March 2012 |
48 |
2 |
|
132 |
122 |
38 |
172 |
220 |
June 2008 |
October 2013 |
March 2014 |
March 2014 |
69 |
5 |
|
11 |
12 |
2 |
99 |
103 |
September 2010 |
August 2012 |
November 2012 |
April 2014 |
43 |
20 |
|
486 |
200 |
308 |
167 |
235 |
April 2015 |
June 2023 |
June 2023 |
Jan 2023 |
93 |
-5 |
|
80 |
56 |
104 |
106 |
149 |
August 2011 |
January 2013 |
November 2013 |
December 2016 |
64 |
47 |
|
263 |
66 |
262 |
375 |
532 |
July 2014 |
May 2014 |
December 2015 |
March 2016 |
20 |
22 |
|
41 |
28 |
31 |
40 |
61 |
November 2018 |
January 2017 |
March 2017 |
February 2019 |
3 |
25 |
|
1,044 |
90 |
745 |
1,022 |
1,363 |
340 |
116 |
1. The costs in this table are "P50" estimates that include allowances for risk and uncertainty. This means there is a 50% probability of the projects being delivered either under or over budget.
2. Figures quoted for the 2013 update are in 2013 money values, original estimates have not been escallated from the 2012 position so the delta is slightly overstated
3. Five of these projects passed the design gate before the appointment of Nuclear Management Partners Limited
