Academies and free schools - Education Contents


6  Effective structures for primary schools

Impact of academy status at KS1 and KS2

165. A far smaller proportion of primary schools than secondary schools have converted to academy status, but the number of schools involved is greater. Most of this growth has been very recent: the DfE announced in 2012 that it would match 400 underperforming primary schools with sponsors, double the number then already open. The NAO reports that the DfE overshot this target to achieve a further 445 primary sponsored academies by the end of 2013.[277]

166. Evidence on the effect of academisation on primary schools is not yet available, although the DfE is strongly of the view that the impact is beneficial. Officials told us that looking at Ofsted inspection results for converter academies:

    For primary schools, 33% of academies were more likely to retain their outstanding judgment, as against 25% of all local authority-maintained schools. For primary schools, 27% of academies were more likely to go from good to outstanding, as opposed to 12% of local authority schools. For those that were satisfactory, 71% of primaries as academies had improved versus 58% of local authority schools.[278]

167. Lord Nash, the academies minister, has also stated that primary converters achieve higher results for their pupils: "in 2013-25% of their pupils were above the expected standard at age 11 compared to 21% across all state-funded schools".[279] For both these claims, it is important to remember that converters are more likely to be strong, high-achieving schools and so start from a firmer base than the average local authority school. We have been unable to locate any evidence, either way, of a relationship between primary academy status and raised attainment.

Suitability of the academy model

168. There is a widely-held view that the smaller size of most primary schools and their greater reliance on local authority support may make academy status more problematic for them. Typical of evidence to us was that of the NAHT, which argued that: "Primary schools are small organisations coping with heavy workloads."[280] While some primary schools have converted to stand-alone academies, the requirements in terms of support staff, including business managers to ensure value to money for services previously supplied by the local authority and human resources, mean that the number of primary academies adopting this model remains low.

169. The DfE accepts the validity of these concerns and its favoured model for primary academies is a MAT or an umbrella trust.[281] Despite this, we heard some evidence that the particular challenges for primary schools within the academy system are not sufficiently recognised. Concerns ranged from the low levels of representation of the primary sector on the new headteacher boards to fears that cross-sector MATs could view their primary schools merely as feeders for the more important secondary schools or, more broadly, might lack knowledge of the primary sector and its importance in its own right.[282] Forced conversion of primary schools has triggered most of the high profile protests against academisation such as at Downhills in Haringey, Roke Primary School in Croydon or Cavell Primary School in Norwich.

The effect of collaborative partnerships at primary level

170. A number of primary heads told us that, whilst becoming an academy had improved their practice and their school, this was primarily because of the advantages generated by the collaborative framework of a multi-academy trust. Katie Beal, Headteacher of Eastfield Primary School in Hull and member of a MAT, explained:

    We have made a faster rate of improvement because of the collaborations we have made with the other schools in our MAT—that ability for us to challenge each other and support each other to improve even further in a way that we possibly could not have done if we had not had those links that make us absolutely responsible for each other's successes. We are accountable for each other, and therefore it is imperative we support each other to improve.[283]

171. There is a range of models of primary partnerships in operation, not all of which involve academisation. Evidence submitted to us regarding various locally-based partnership initiatives indicates that primary collaboration can be effective in raising standards. The model and structure of the partnership appears to be less important than the level of commitment of heads and teachers and the depth of collaboration. Wendy Marshall of the David Ross Academy Trust told us:

    joining with groups of like-minded schools, whether in collaborative clusters or in multi-academy trusts, opens up a number of benefits, not only financial benefits but educational opportunities and economies of scale. Our smallest primary school has 55 children; our largest has 600 children and, equally, our smallest secondary is 150. So there are ways that smaller schools can be presented with the same opportunities of working in groups, clusters, collaborations or academy trusts.[284]

172. The DfE offers financial aid to primary schools who convert to academy status. The Primary Chains Grant is a lump sum available to groups of three schools (including at least one primary) wishing to convert to academy status. In our report on School partnerships and collaboration, we recommended that the grant be made available to schools looking to collaborate in other ways.[285]

Conclusions and recommendations on primary schools

173. We have sought but not found convincing evidence of the impact of academy status on attainment in primary schools. We recommend that the DfE commission, as a matter of urgency, research into the relationship between academy status and outcomes at KS1 and KS2 so that sponsors and RSCs can be clear which models and characteristics are most strongly correlated with improved performance.

174. The primary sector benefits most from collaborative structures, whether these are facilitated by academy status or otherwise. We reiterate the recommendation in our report on school partnerships and collaboration that the additional funding available to schools through the Primary Chains Grant be extended to primary schools forming maintained federations, as well as Multi Academy Trusts. Such funding is particularly important to encourage collaboration between small schools in rural areas.


277   NAO, Academies and maintained schools: Oversight and intervention, HC (2014-15) 721, p30 Back

278   Q6 Back

279  https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/300343/DfE_PA_Magazine_Guide_Final.pdf Back

280   National Association of Head Teachers (AFS0091) para 30 Back

281   Q8 Back

282   Eg. National Governors Association [AFS0133], Q1114 [Chris Keates], Q1116 [Kevin Courtney] Back

283   Q694 Back

284   Q697 [Wendy Marshall] Back

285   Education Committee, Fourth Report of Session 2013-14, School Partnerships and Cooperation, HC 269, rec 13 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2015
Prepared 27 January 2015