4 The EU Emissions Trading System
22. The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is the
world's first and currently largest emissions trading system covering
11,000 power stations and industrial plants in 31 countries. Proposals
to include aviation have been made and will be implemented if
the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) do not come
forward with robust plans to cut emissions from aircraft.[80]
It covers around 45% of the EU's greenhouse gas emissions. Launched
in 2005, the first 'learning by doing' phase lasted until the
end of 2007. The second phase ran from 2008 until 2012 and coincided
with the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (see chapter
5). The third and current phase will run from 2013 to 2020. This
phase represents a significant departure form phase one and two,
firstly because it includes a single EU-wide cap on emissions
and secondly involves the use of auctioning, rather than providing
allowances to participants for free, as the default method for
allocating allowances.[81]
23. The EU ETS has demonstrated that an international
market in carbon emission allowances can operate effectively.
This achievement constitutes a significant measure of success.
Martin Pibworth, Managing Director of Wholesale at SSE, described
it as "pioneering".[82]
David Hone said that it was a "very well-functioning system".[83]
This view was supported by the European Commission and the Government.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State told us
"it is doing very well in having a leading role in providing
a structure that works".[84]
Despite this, most stakeholders think it has failed to incentivise
emissions reductions and decarbonisation of the economy, principally
because the carbon price achieved has not been high enough to
influence investment decisions. Dirk Forrister said this was because
the market was "awash" with over 2 billion surplus allowances
following the 2008 financial crisis which has led to a reduction
in economic output and subsequently the demand for allowances.[85]
Lord Stern said that the "ludicrously low" prices in
the EU ETS were having no impact on emissions.[86]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State summed up its performance;
"it is like a school report, good in parts; more to do".[87]
24. In January 2012, we published a report on the
EU ETS and argued it was "going through a period of difficulty
as tumbling prices have watered down the incentive for investment
in low-carbon options".[88]
We put forward a number of proposals for short term fixes and
long term flexibility to reinvigorate the trading system. We recommended
action to increase the price of carbon by removing a significant
volume of EU allowances and tightening the cap. We concluded that
"if this can be achieved, the EU ETS can continue to be a
significant force in promoting international action on climate
change".[89] Three
years on, very little has changed. Respondents to this inquiry
were overwhelmingly supportive of reforming the EU ETS.[90]
Reform could help it play a more prominent role as the central
driver for EU decarbonisation.[91]
Lord Stern told us that "making the ETS work well is fundamental"
and if carbon went back to a more sensible price in Europe it
"would create a very powerful signal worldwide".[92]
The Prime Minister agreed that reform of the EU ETS was "essential"
and that it was "essential that Britain lead this process
of reform".[93]
25. Today there are two main proposals on the table
to reform the EU ETS. The first involves postponing the auctioning
of 900 million allowances. By temporarily 'back-loading' these
allowances the European Commission hopes demand will increase
and drive up the price of carbon.[94]
The second involves long term structural change to address the
ongoing imbalance between the supply and demand of allowances.[95]
The Commission proposed introducing a market stability reserve
(MSR) at the beginning of the next trading period in 2021.[96]
Mr Forrister described how the MSR might work in practice:
I think of it as being the allowance equivalent
of a strategic petroleum reserve. It would be a reserve where
excess credits are kept aside and brought to market in times when
you are fearful about price spikes because the supplies are getting
too tight. Conversely, you would withhold credits from auction
in times when you felt like the market had plenty of liquidity
and plenty of allowances in circulation.[97]
26. While some businesses would have preferred the
permanent removal of allowances from the system, most businesses
including EDF Energy, SSE and Shell, supported the introduction
of the MSR as the best solution currently on the table.[98]
Miles Austin asserted that "if we do not get the MSR in place
the EU ETS will become internationally irrelevant".[99]
Some went further arguing that the need for reform was so great
that the MSR should be introduced in 2017 rather than 2021 as
originally proposed by the Commission.[100]
The Government supported the proposal to introduce the MSR earlier
and the Commission made it clear that it would not stand in the
way if the European Parliament and Council wish to apply the reserve
earlier.[101] It may
be difficult to get agreement, however, because some industries
and countries are unhappy about the introduction of the MSR or
any mechanism to remove allowances, raise the price of carbon
and thereby impact on EU competitiveness.[102]
As discussed in chapter 2 both the Government and the Commission
were confident that these concerns were unfounded.[103]
27. The EU has played, and will continue to play
an important role in promoting emissions trading and in eventually
linking different systems.[104]
Dr Denny Ellerman suggested that "although little noted as
such, the EU ETS is the world's first and only multinational cap-and-trade
system".[105]
Damien Meadows said that "the provisions in the law are quite
open for linking".[106]
The EU ETS Directive provides for the possibility to link the
EU ETS with other compatible systems.[107]
The Commission set out some of the conditions which would need
to be met:
Compatibility in the EU ETS context has been
understood to mean that robust registries, monitoring, reporting
and verification systems, as well as enforcement systems are in
place. [A prospective system] should also have a similar ambition
level, including similar (qualitative and quantitative) limits
on the use of international (and domestic) offsets. The key will
be to ensure that the systems have the same basic environmental
integrity and that a tonne of CO2 in one system is
a tonne in the other system.[108]
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State said that
the Government wanted to ensure the EU ETS would "widen"
and that "linking must be the goal".[109]
The Government and others were clear however that the EU ETS would
need to be reformed in order to make the EU a credible partner
before linking could be considered.[110]
Mr Meadows agreed that once the EU ETS was reformed other systems
might express more interest in linking.[111]
In the meantime countries continue to learn from the experience
of the EU ETS, something we heard strongly and frequently expressed
during our visit to China.[112]
28. The issue of surplus allowances in the EU
Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) must be addressed urgently.
We recommend that the Government focus on getting agreement in
the European Parliament and Council to implement the market stability
reserve (MSR) at the earlier date of 2017 rather than in 2021,
as originally proposed by the European Commission. Once it has
been reformed the credibility of the EU ETS will increase along
with the prospects of linking it to other systems in future.
80 European Commission, 'Reducing emissions from aviation,'
accessed on 10 February 2015 Back
81
European Commission, 'The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS),'
accessed on 10 February 2015 Back
82
Q41 (Mr Pibworth) Back
83
Q154 (Mr Hone), Q165 (Mr Hone) Back
84
Q179 (Mr Meadows), Q195 (Ms Rudd) Back
85
Q25 (Mr Forrister), Q114 (Sir David) Back
86
Q41 (Mr Pibworth), Qq165-166 (Mr Hone), Q179 (Mr Meadows), Q195
(Ms Rudd), Oral evidence taken on 26 November 2014, HC (2014-15)
666, Q30 (Professor Lord Stern) Back
87
Q195 (Ms Rudd) Back
88
Energy and Climate Change Committee, The EU Emissions Trading System,
Tenth Report of Session 2010-2012 (17 January 2012), p47 Back
89
As above Back
90
LTS 005 (DECC), LTS 009 (EDF Energy), LTS 011 (SSE) Back
91
Q25 (Mr Forrister), Q41 (Mr Pibworth), Q46 (Mr Pibworth), Qq95-96
(Sir David), Q167 (Mr Hone), Q179 (Mr Meadows), Q197 (Ms Rudd),
Oral evidence taken on 26 November 2014, HC (2014-15) 666, Q30
(Professor Lord Stern) Back
92
Oral evidence taken on 26 November 2014, HC (2014-15) 666, Q30
(Professor Lord Stern) Back
93
Oral evidence taken before the Liaison Committee on 16 December 2014,
HC (2014-15) 887, Q4 (Mr Cameron) Back
94
Q167 (Mr Hone) Back
95
Q25 (Mr Forrister), Q28 (Dr Taschini), Back
96
Q179 (Mr Meadows), European Commission, 'Structural reform of the European carbon market,'
accessed on 10 February 2015 Back
97
Q25 (Mr Forrister) Back
98
Q49 (Mr Austin), Qq168-170 (Mr Hone), LTS 009 (EDF Energy), LTS
009 (SSE) Back
99
Q63 (Mr Austin) Back
100
Qq47-49 (Mr Pibworth, Mr Austin), Q197 (Ms Rudd) Back
101
Q114 (Sir David), Q180 (Mr Meadows), Q197 (Ms Rudd) Back
102
Qq48-49 (Dr Leese), Q197 (Ms Rudd) Back
103
Q45 (Mr Pibworth), Qq186-187 (Mr Meadows), Q195 (Ms Rudd), Q200
(Ms Rudd) Back
104
Q184 (Mr Meadows) Back
105
LTS 007 (A. Denny Ellerman) Back
106
Q183 (Mr Meadows) Back
107
LTS 016 (IETA) Back
108
LTS 017 (EU Commission) Back
109
Q198 (Ms Rudd) Back
110
Qq45-46 (Mr Pibworth), Q198 (Ms Rudd, Mr van Heyningen). Back
111
Q185 (Mr Meadows) Back
112
Q183 (Mr Meadows), LTS 007 (A. Denny Ellerman) Back
|