Documents considered by the Committee on 18 June 2014 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


11 EU Special Representative for Kosovo

Committee's assessment Politically important
Committee's decision Cleared from scrutiny
Document details Council Decision extending the mandate of the EU Special Representative in Kosovo
Legal base Articles 31 (2) and 33 TEU; QMV
Department Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Summary and Committee's conclusions

11.1 This Council Decision renews the mandate and budget of Samuel Žbogar as EU Special Representative (EUSR) in Kosovo for a further eight months, from 30 June 2014 until 28 February 2015. He will also continue his role as acting as head of the EU Office in Pristina.

11.2 The Minister for Europe (Mr David Lidington) illustrates clearly the various ways Mr Žbogar has continued to make a positive contribution in an extremely challenging situation, particularly with regard to the EU's largest and most longstanding rule-of-law mission, EULEX Kosovo.[41] This is especially important at this juncture because, as our most recent Report on EULEX Kosovo illustrated, it faces a very difficult transition, in which Mr Žbogar will no doubt continue to play a leading role.

11.3 The proposals for EULEX over the next two years outlined in that Report emanate from a European Court of Auditors report and an EEAS Strategic Review: an unwieldy EULEX would be down-sized, specialising in the areas which would make the most impact in the next two years; its Executive division — covering policing and sensitive criminal cases — would remain in both the north and south of Kosovo, but in a smaller way, while most of EULEX's current capacity-building activities would be taken on by Commission-funded project work (reflecting a key recommendation of the European Court of Auditors' earlier report). As of now, we await a Council Decision in the autumn, with the full 2014-15 budget, and information about the OpPlan; about the substance of the proposed reforms; and about developments in EULEX's work in the interim.[42]

11.4 Despite his success and the importance of continuity, the Minister explains why Mr Žbogar's mandate is being extended only until February 2015, viz., the uncertainty over the future of the EUSR role per se, in the face of a proposal by the High Representative to absorb them into the EEAS — a proposal that the Government is, rightly, resisting, and the final determination of which has been postponed until a new High Representative is in post.[43]

11.5 The Minister explains that the negotiations on the 2014-15 budget funding Mr Žbogar's mandate have yet to be finalised. However, we are sufficiently satisfied on the basis of the information provided thus far now to clear this Council Decision from scrutiny (though we should be grateful if the Minister would provide us with a budget breakdown, once it has been finalised).

Full details of the document: Council Decision extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative in Kosovo: (36034), —.

Background

11.6 The EU has had a central role in post-conflict Kosovo: firstly, as part of the UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, or UNMIK; and latterly, through the EU Special Representative/Head of the EU Delegation and the EU's largest and most longstanding civilian ESDP mission, EULEX Kosovo.

11.7 The EUSR's mandate stems from the 14 December 2007 European Council underlining the EU's readiness to play a leading role in strengthening stability in the Western Balkans, including by contributing to a European Security and Defence Policy mission and to an International Civilian Office as part of the international presence in Kosovo. Joint Action 2008/123/CFSP adopted on 4 February 2008 established an EU Special Representative for Kosovo. Kosovo declared independence on 17 February 2008.

11.8 The mandate of the EUSR is based on the objective of securing a stable, viable, peaceful and multi-ethnic Kosovo, which will contribute to regional stability. His tasks include being the channel for the EU's advice and support to the political process, promoting political coordination in Kosovo through the EU missions, ensuring a coherent public message, and contributing to the consolidation of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Kosovo.

11.9 As our earlier Reports detail, until May 2011 the EUSR mandate was combined with that of the International Civilian Representative (ICR; appointed by an International Steering Group, of which the UK is a member, and the ultimate supervisory authority over the implementation of the UN Special Envoy's Comprehensive Settlement Proposal: Kosovo committed itself to that proposal as part of its declaration of independence). The ICR had no direct role in the day to day administration of Kosovo, but retained strong executive and corrective powers to ensure the successful overall implementation of the Settlement. The ICR's mandate was to continue until the ISG determined that Kosovo had implemented the terms of the Settlement.

11.10 Previous Council Decisions cleared by the Committee:

—  ended that arrangement, leaving the incumbent as the ICR;

—  set out a new mandate that combined the EUSR role with that of heading a new Liaison Office in Belgrade, which had been set up as part of the EU-sponsored (and UN-endorsed) Dialogue between Pristina and Belgrade;

—  appointed Fernando Gentilini as EUSR (an Italian diplomat, now a member of the EEAS and closely involved with the Pristina/Belgrade Dialogue since its inception) until he became the EEAS Director for the Western Balkans; and

—  as of 1 February 2012, appointed Samuel Žbogar for the position (and thus also as Head of the EU Office in Pristina).

11.11 The Minister for Europe noted that Mr Žbogar (a former Slovenian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador to the United States and EU Political Director) would bring deep knowledge of the region and its personalities, as well as extensive diplomatic and EU experience. He had been in regular contact with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office over policy towards the Western Balkans and helped maintain the EU's focus on the region and enlargement in general. Furthermore, the appointment of a former Foreign Minister was, he believed, a firm signal of the EU's commitment to Kosovo's European future.

The Minister's Explanatory Memorandum of 12 June 2014

11.12 The Minister recalls that, on 24 April, the High Representative (Baroness Ashton) informed Member States that she did not propose to extend any EUSR mandates expiring this year beyond February 2015 in order to allow her successor the necessary time for follow-up decisions; and therefore proposed to extend the mandate and budget of Mr Žbogar, as EUSR Kosovo, for another eight months.

11.13 The Minister comments as follows:

"I welcome this recommendation and remain fully supportive of the work of the EUSR in Kosovo. Since the beginning of his role in December 2011, Mr Žbogar, the former Slovenian Minister of Foreign Affairs, has brought extensive diplomatic and EU experience to his role as Kosovo's EUSR and added value to the EU's work in Kosovo by:

·  "Building important relationships, in particular with Serbs in Kosovo, and thereby playing a key role in enabling Kosovo to move forward to the next stage of EU integration. Mr Žbogar has maintained an EUSR/EU Office team in North Mitrovica to engage with, and listen to, the needs of the Serb population. He helped to facilitate voting in Serbian and Kosovan elections by Serbian citizens in Kosovo, and negotiated visits by Serb politicians to encourage the Serb community in Kosovo to co-operate with the Kosovo authorities. His positive relationship with the new Serb mayors in north Kosovo has also helped secure the necessary compromises to implement agreements reached through the Serbia-Kosovo Dialogue, for example over the use of Serbian and Kosovan logos in connection with municipal statues.

·  "Mr Žbogar has also used his positive relationships to support the work of the EULEX rule of law mission and smooth over the inevitable tensions caused by a number of EULEX arrests of significant figures. He has worked hard to build an effective relationship with EULEX and given sound political advice to the EULEX Head of Mission (Bernd Borchardt). They coordinate activities through their joint chairing of the Joint Rule of Law Coordination Board, which facilitates a high-level dialogue with Kosovo government officials on reforming the rule of law in Kosovo."

11.14 The Minister then says that, to build on these successes and ensure the EUSR's work continues to deliver on UK objectives, UK officials, with the support of several like-minded EU Member States, have secured a number of changes to the mandate in relation to EULEX:

"These include a role for the EUSR in guiding the transition from EULEX when the mission's renewed mandate expires in 2016, a very important issue given the expectation that the EU Office will take on certain responsibilities for monitoring and assistance. A further change is codifying the EUSR's role in using public diplomacy to build support for EULEX, which will continue to be a challenge as EULEX steps up its rule of law work.

"The policy objectives in the proposed mandate include: playing a leading role in promoting a stable, viable, peaceful, democratic and multi-ethnic Kosovo; strengthening stability in the region and contributing to regional cooperation and good neighbourly relations in the Western Balkans; promoting a Kosovo that is committed to the rule of law and to the protection of minorities and of cultural and religious heritage; supporting Kosovo's progress towards the Union in accordance with the European perspective of the region and in line with the relevant Council Conclusions.

"The mandate calls for Mr Žbogar to do the following (changes italicised):

·  "offer the Union's advice and support in the political process;

·  "promote overall Union political coordination in Kosovo;

·  "strengthen the presence of the Union in Kosovo and ensure its coherence and effectiveness;

·  "provide local political guidance to the Head of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO), including on the political aspects of issues relating to executive responsibilities;

·  "ensure consistency and coherence of Union action in Kosovo, including in guiding locally the EULEX transition;

·  "support Kosovo's progress towards the Union, in accordance with the European perspective of the region, through targeted public communication and Union outreach activities designed to ensure a broader understanding and support from the Kosovo public on issues related to the Union, including the work of EULEX;

·  "monitor, assist and facilitate progress on political, economic and European priorities, in line with respective institutional competencies and responsibilities;

·  "contribute to the development and consolidation of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Kosovo, including with regard to women and children and protection of minorities, in accordance with the Union's human rights policy and Union Guidelines on Human Rights;

·  "assist in the Implementation of the Belgrade-Pristina dialogue facilitated by the Union".

11.15 In sum, the Minister says:

"I believe that this new mandate will enable the EUSR to continue to promote Kosovo's European perspective, improve the effectiveness of EULEX, and demonstrate the EU's strengthened commitment to its relationship with Kosovo."

11.16 With regard to the Financial Implications, the Minister says:

"EUSRs are funded from Heading 4 of the EU Budget, which covers the EU's external spend. Last year's budget for the EUSR office was settled at €1,870,000 for the 12 month mandate. The UK's assessment is that this represented value for money. This year's proposed budget represents an increase of 17% (€203,336 pro rata) to €1,450,000 for the next eight month period (€2,175,000 pro-rata).

"The Government supports the progressive transfer of resources from EULEX to the EUSR. The first stage of this is the transfer of nine staff to the EUSR involved in monitoring and assistance. These areas are critical aspects of the EUSR's mandate and therefore require some additional resource and support. While this transfer will mean an increase, compared with 2013, in the budget of the EUSR, I expect there to be a significant net reduction in the overall cost of the EUSR and EULEX together. Negotiations on this are continuing.

"A scrutiny reserve is in place and my officials have stressed the need for a budget to be circulated as soon as possible. Given the EUSR's mandate expires on 30 June, the EU is keen to adopt the Council Decision extending the mandate and agreeing the budget as soon as the UK has lifted its reserve."

Previous Committee Reports

None: but see (33609) —: Fifty-second Report HC 428-xlvii (2010-12), chapter 24 (18 January 2012); (33170) —: Forty-second Report HC 428-xxxvii (2010-12), chapter 22 (12 October 2011); (33066) —: Fortieth Report HC 428-xxxv (2010-12), chapter 13 (7 September 2011); (32738) — and (32590) —: Twentieth-eighth Report HC 428-xxvi (2010-12), chapter 10 (11 May 2011) and (32590) — (32601) — (32602) — and (32603) —: Twenty-third Report HC 428-xxi (2010-11), chapter 4 (23 March 2011); also see (32505) —: Nineteenth Report HC 428-xvii (2010-11), chapter 12 (16 February 2011).


41   EULEX Kosovo is focused on local ownership and capacity building, through mentoring, monitoring and advice; aimed at advancing the goal of a stable, viable, peaceful, democratic, multi-ethnic Kosovo, contributing to regional cooperation and stability, and committed to the rule of law and to the protection of minorities. Back

42   For full details, see (36004) -: Fiftieth Report HC 83-xlv (2013-14), chapter 15 (14 May 2014). Back

43   For the full discussion of and background to these wider issues, see our Report of 4 June 2014: (35701) -: HC 219-i (2014-15), chapter 27 (4 June 2014). Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 1 July 2014