Documents considered by the Committee on 9 July 2014 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


11 The EU and the Sahel: EUCAP Sahel Niger

Committee's assessment Politically important
Committee's decisionCleared from scrutiny
Document detailsCouncil Decision on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger)
Legal baseArticles 28, 42(4) and 43(2) TEU; unanimity
DepartmentForeign and Commonwealth Office

Summary and Committee's conclusions

11.1 Council Decision 2012/392/CFSP established EUCAP Sahel Niger, to build the capacity of Nigerien security forces to fight terrorism and organised crime. EUCAP Sahel Niger was launched in July 2012, and is mandated for two years until July 2014. It has five main tasks:

·  advise and assist in the implementation of the security dimension of the Nigerien Strategy for Security and Development at national level;

·  support the development of regional and international coordination in the fight against terrorism and organised crime;

·  develop and implement adequate criminal investigation training programmes utilising a "train the trainer" approach;

·  support the development of Nigerien Security Forces resilience by developing a Human Resources strategy and providing training in management issues; and

·  contribute to the identification, planning and implementation of projects in the security field.

11.2 The first year's budget was €8.7 million; the second year, €9.2 million. The mission got off to a slow start, largely due to a rushed planning process, lack of local buy-in and inadequate leadership. It began to pick up speed in its second year; so much so that, in March 2014, the Minister for Europe (Mr David Lidington) was able to report that the Mission was now delivering against its mandate, and that an EEAS Strategic Review had recommended extending the mandate for a further two years from 17 July, with the Mission being roughly the same size, retaining its current structure and costing a similar amount to now, with some small changes to the current tasks. Niger remained a fragile democracy in an increasingly volatile region; Nigerien elections were due in 2015-16, and a visible EU presence at least until then would increase the chances of a smooth poll.

11.3 This draft Council Decision extends the mandate for two years to July 2016, with a budget covering the period July 2014 to July 2015. The Minister says since its launch in 2012, EUCAP Sahel Niger has trained over 2,500 members of the security forces, armed forces, civil service and judiciary. He describes the mission's work on improving the services' human resource and forensic capabilities as having been particularly successful; likewise its work to co-ordinate EUCAP's activity with that of other international actors in Niger (the latter led by the UK secondee in the Mission).

11.4 EUCAP will continue to assist the Nigerien authorities to define and implement their National Security Strategy and contribute to improving the capacities of Nigerien security actors in the fight against terrorism and organised crime. The Mission gains 11 new staff[24] and will expand its activity in some areas, including additional visits to the northern town of Agadez. Despite this, and (so says the Minister) as a result of UK lobbying, the Mission's budget for July 2014-July 2015 shows a very small decrease compared to this year's budget, principally due to savings on capital expenditure.

11.5 In our first Report on this mission, we noted that it demonstrated, not for the first time, the leading, sometimes solitary and commendable role the Minister and his officials have had in driving down the cost of CSDP missions; and are pleased to be able to commend them once again.

11.6 The next milestone would appear to be the 2015-16 elections with regard to which the Mission is seen as a stabilising presence. We should be grateful if the Minister would write to us then, with an update on the Mission's achievements in the interim and his assessment of the Mission's likely future role in the light of the election outcomes.

11.7 In the meantime, we clear this Council Decision.

Full details of the documents: Council Decision amending Decision 2012/392/CFSP on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger): (36171), —.

Background

11.8 Council Decision 2012/392/CFSP established EUCAP Sahel Niger, to build the capacity of Nigerien security forces to fight terrorism and organised crime. EUCAP Sahel Niger was launched in July 2012, and is mandated for two years until July 2014. It has five main tasks:

·  advise and assist in the implementation of the security dimension of the Nigerien Strategy for Security and Development at national level;

·  support the development of regional and international coordination in the fight against terrorism and organised crime;

·  develop and implement adequate criminal investigation training programmes utilising a "train the trainer" approach;

·  support the development of Nigerien Security Forces resilience by developing a Human Resources strategy and providing training in management issues; and

·  contribute to the identification, planning and implementation of projects in the security field.[25]

11.9 The budget for the first year of the mission was set at €8.7 million. That was extended in July 2013 until the end of October 2013, because EUCAP Sahel Niger had under-performed. The Committee's observations are set out in the first "Our assessment" section of our 23 October 2013 Report.[26] In July, the Minister for Europe (Mr David Lidington) had said that, once the Status of Mission Agreement (SOMA)[27] was in place, local buy-in could be expected to improve, together with the ability of the Mission to carry out its tasks: his Explanatory Memorandum of 17 October 2013 showed that this had now begun to happen (see paragraph 16.17 of our Report under reference). The proposed budget represents a pro rata increase of 5% on the previous budget of €8.7 million (the Minister's detailed analysis is at the Annex to our Report under reference). The Minister's accompanying letter was also interesting not only with regard to this mission, but also more widely (see paragraph 16.21-16.25 of our Report under reference).

11.10 Despite the welcome indications of progress, it had nonetheless taken a year to reach the point where the mission was now on track to deliver against clear goals. Moreover, as the Minister noted, the mission was still seriously under-staffed. Also, his comments about funding for equipment not being sufficiently tapped, that both the mission and the EEAS could be working more closely with other actors, and that there was soon to be a change, suggest that the mission had suffered from inadequate leadership. We recalled that it would have been obvious from the Committee's earlier Reports that it agreed with the Minister that the key lesson to be learned from the Niger process was that rushed planning led to poor mission performance; it was accordingly gratifying that he had instructed officials to ensure that the launch of any further civilian mission was delayed until proper planning was complete.

11.11 Against this background, the Committee accordingly said that it looked to the Minister to keep the Committee informed in writing as these processes took shape, and to ensure that any proposals for a new mission and/or for mandate extensions was submitted for scrutiny in time for any questions arising to be pursued with him and, if necessary, debated, before any Council Decisions were adopted.[28]

The Minister's letter of 28 March 2014

11.12 Prompted by the EEAS Strategic Review, the Minister reported that the Mission was now delivering against its mandate. The President's support had been instrumental in directing how different ministries and services should work with EUCAP to implement reforms. Training activities were currently working well. EUCAP had been praised by third countries, including the US, for its work in co-ordinating wider international action in Niger. And the mission was seeking to build sustainability into its activity by creating a training cycle within the services, including a pool of mission-trained Nigerien personnel guaranteed to stay in post as trainers for a period of years. However, there was more to do: Niger remained a fragile democracy in an increasingly volatile region; it is prone to the criminal smuggling of weapons, drugs and weapons; problems in Mali had spilled over into Niger; in Nigeria to the south, Boko Haram's campaign of violence continued; while to the north, Libya remained volatile and its border with Niger porous. Nigerien elections were due in 2015-16, and a visible EU presence at least until then would increase the chances of a smooth poll.

11.13 The Minister also provided a meaningful insight into the limité EEAS Strategic Review: it recommended extending the mandate for a further two years from 17 July, with the Mission being roughly the same size, retaining its current structure and costing a similar amount to now, with some small changes to the current tasks (for full details, see our Report of 9 April 2014).[29]

The draft Council Decision

11.14 This draft Council Decision extends the mandate for two years to July 2016, with a budget covering the period July 2014 to July 2015.

The Government's view

11.15 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 4 July 2014, the Minister says since its launch in 2012, EUCAP Sahel Niger has trained over 2,500 members of the security forces, armed forces, civil service and judiciary. He describes the mission's work on improving the services' human resource and forensic capabilities as having been particularly successful; likewise its work to co-ordinate EUCAP's activity with that of other international actors in Niger (the latter led by the UK secondee in the Mission).

11.16 The Minister confirms that the March 2014 Strategic Review proposed a number of changes to the Mission's future role, whilst retaining the same basic size, structure and overall purpose, which he outlines thus:

·  increase its work on inter-operability and training programmes at the operational level, and do less at the top level where effect has been harder to measure;

·  curtail the Liaison Officer slots in Mali and Mauritania, particularly in view of the creation of the civilian CSDP Mission in Mali; and

·  increase its work in support of border management, including through an increased presence in northern Niger.

11.17 He continues as follows:

    "Accordingly, the Mission's new mandate includes a number of amendments. The Liaison Officers in Mali and Mauritania have been trimmed, other job slots amalgamated and the associated savings used to expand staffing in other areas. Full details on staffing appear in paragraph 19 below.[30] There are also a number of technical changes and updates to reflect the situation in Niger two years on from the launch of EUCAP.

    "The principal change to the Mission's remit is to extend its activity in the northern town of Agadez, which is seen as a hub for both legal and illegal trade in Niger and the wider Sahel. Some Member States were anxious that the EU should do more to secure Niger's borders and combat people-smuggling and -trafficking and other organised crime affecting the EU, particularly given that many of those transported ultimately found themselves in boats in the Mediterranean. After a tough negotiation Member States agreed that rather than establish a new office in Agadez (which would have been expensive, prone to security risks and of questionable overall value), the Mission should undertake more frequent visits to Agadez in order to bolster the successful collaboration with the PC Mixte (joint operations centres bringing together the main security actors) there".

11.18 The Minister professes himself content with this outcome, and says that his officials have worked hard to contain the costs associated with the additional travel and staff required (see the annex to this chapter of our Report for the Minister's detailed analysis).

Previous Committee Reports: None; but see (35390) —: Nineteenth Report HC-xviii (2013-14), chapter 16 (30 October 2013) and Forty-sixth Report HC 83-xli (2013-14, chapter 13 (9 April 2014).

Annex: The Minister's detailed analysis of the 2014-15 Budget

"The UK managed to secure savings to the proposed Commission budget and a pro rata overall decrease in the budget compared to last year despite the additions of 11 new staff; 4 new accommodation units to house the extra staff; the new work in Agadez; an increase in medical facilities; upgraded security; and functioning IT. A pro rata comparison of the new budget to the previous budget is set out below (in euros).
Budget heading
Current budget

(8,5 months)
Current budget

(pro rata per12 months)
Budget

(July 2014-July 2015)

(12 months)
1. Personnel costs 3,245,1364,581,368 5,172,170
2. Missions 217,275306,742 322,120
3. Running expenditure 1,243,5411,755,588 1,858,323
4. Capital expenditure 747,6501,055,505 638,853
5. Representation 3,4004,800 9,600
6. Projects 850,1561,200,220 974,440
Sub-total (1-6) 6,307,1588,904,223 8,975,506
Contingencies 192,842272,247 179,494
Total 6,500,000 9,176,470 9,155,000

"Personnel Costs: €5,172,170

"Personnel costs have increased by €590,802. The mission is no longer employing Liaison Officers in Mali and Mauritania. However, the number of seconded experts will increase by 7, to include experts in border management, training policy, policing, evaluation and security, and a post to coordinate activities in the north.

"In addition, a contracted Security Analyst has been added and the number of local staff will be increased by 6. This increase in staffing numbers is partly due to the reinforcement of activity in northern Niger and I believe this increase in numbers is reasonable, given the expansion in activity and the impact this activity is expected to have.

"Mission Costs: €322,120

"Mission costs have increased by €15,378. This budget line pays for the costs of travel to Brussels, within the region and within Niger, particularly the costs of experts travelling to Agadez for training activities.

"Running Costs: €1,858,323

"This budget line has increased by €102,735. This covers vehicle running costs, including vehicle rental in Agadez. This also covers IT and communication costs, which includes internet and web services for EUCAP's headquarters and staff accommodation, rental costs of office and accommodation, administrative costs, staff training, as well as security, medical and welfare services.

"Capital Expenditure: €638,853

"Capital costs have decreased by €416,652. Now that the mission is set up, there is less need for costly capital expenditure. However, the mission has budgeted for a certain amount of IT equipment, security equipment and medical kits.

"Representation Costs: €9,600

"Representation costs have doubled. The amount previously budgeted to represent the mission had not been sufficient and has been raised to €800 a month.

"Project Costs: €974,440

"Project costs have decreased by €225,780. This budget line covers 16 projects which complement the mission's training activities. Examples of projects include refurbishing and equipping the Gendarmerie's Operational Centre in Agadez, renovating and equipping the PC Mixtes in Dosso, Maradi and Zinder, preparation of training materials and support to the Ministry of Justice to strengthen the penal chain.

"Contingencies: €179,494

"Contingency costs have reduced by €92,753, but will only be used with prior written approval of the Commission."


24   The overall authorized strength is 80 personnel (52 international staff and 28 local staff). Back

25   For full details of the Mission, see http://eeas.europa.eu/csdp/missions-and-operations/eucap-sahel-niger/pdf/factsheet_eucap_sahel_niger_en.pdf Back

26   See (35390) -: Nineteenth Report HC-xviii (2013-14), chapter 16 (30 October 2013). Back

27   Status of forces agreements (SOFAs) and status of mission agreements (SOMAs) are bilateral or multilateral treaties that define the legal position of military forces and civilian personnel deployed by one or more states or by an international organization in the territory of another state with the latter's consent. Back

28   See (35390) -: Nineteenth Report HC-xviii (2013-14), chapter 16 (30 October 2013). Back

29   See (35390) -: Forty-sixth Report HC 83-xli (2013-14, chapter 13 (9 April 2014). Back

30   The para number in the Minister's EM; in our case, see the "Personnel Costs" section of the annex to this chapter of our Report. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 24 July 2014