Documents considered by the Committee on 5 November 2014 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


9 The working of the comitology committees in 2013

Committee's assessment Legally and politically important
Committee's decisionCleared from scrutiny

Document detailsCommission Report on the working of Committees during 2013
Legal base
DepartmentForeign and Commonwealth Office
Document numbers(36353), 13389/14 + ADD 1, COM(14) 572

Summary and Committee's conclusions

9.1 Committees, consisting of representatives of Member States, exercise oversight of the use of implementing powers given to the Commission in EU legislative acts pursuant to Article 291 TFEU. This process is known as "comitology". The current document is the third annual report on committee activities which the Commission is required to present in accordance with Article 10(2) of the Comitology Regulation (No. 182/2011).[47]

9.2 We noted in our Fifteenth Report that there did not appear to have been any change of material concern in the operation of the comitology committees in 2013, compared with 2012 (excepting the overall increase in the number of committees). However, we were disappointed to see that there had been no significant increase in the use of the more rigorous examination procedure which gives Member States greater control over the act adopted.

9.3 On that question of control, we asked for a further view from the Government on whether it considered that the Council would be pressing for the wider use of examination procedure, where there is scope to do so under the Comitology Regulation. We also asked what impact if any, the judgment in Commission v Parliament and Council[48] (the Biocides case) could have in assisting Member States argue a preference for implementing (as opposed to delegated) powers to be conferred on the Commission. The Government now responds to those questions, informing us that the Council has taken a robust approach to promoting the examination procedure and that it is too soon to predict with certainty the impact of the judgment in the Biocides case.

9.4 We thank the Minister for his prompt and helpful response. We are now content to clear this document from scrutiny.

Full details of the document: Commission Report on the working of Committees during 2013: (36353), 13389/14 + ADD 1, COM(14) 572.

Background and previous scrutiny

9.5 The current document is a new annual report on the working of committees during 2013. We reported the assessment and conclusions of the report and the Government's view of it in our Fifteenth Report of 2014-15.

The Minister's letter of 3 November 2014

9.6 The Minister for Europe (Mr David Lidington) first responds to the question we asked in our Fifteenth Report concerning a wider use of the examination procedure in the exercise of implementing powers. He says:

    "Cabinet Office guidance to officials representing the UK in European negotiations is clear that they should negotiate for the appropriate committee procedure to be specified in the basic act, thus increasing Member State control over Commission implementing acts. The Council does press for use of the examination procedure in cases other than where it is appropriate to use the advisory procedure and I expect that to continue. As you are aware from the Commission's report, the examination procedure, during 2013, was used in 116 committees in comparison to 25 committees where the advisory procedure had been adopted. This is indicative of the Council taking a robust approach in this regard."

9.7 He then considers our question concerning the impact of the judgment in the Biocides case:

    "You specifically asked what impact, if any, the Judgment in Commission v Parliament and Council (the Biocides case) could have in assisting Member States to argue a preference, in any given case, for implementing powers to be conferred on the Commission. Following this Judgment, it should be easier for Member States to argue for implementing acts. In this case the Court considered that in most situations the legislator has discretion in deciding whether to confer a delegated act or implementing act, and provided it could reasonably have taken that view, the risk of successful challenge to that decision is low. Given that this is a recent judgement, we do not yet have quantitative evidence relating to its impact."

Previous Committee Reports

Fifteenth Report HC 219-xv, (2014-15), chapter 7 (22 October 2014).





47   Regulation No. 182/2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Back

48   C-427/12. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 18 November 2014