Documents considered by the Committee on 17 December 2014 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


9 Test procedures for vehicle emissions

Committee's assessment Politically important
Committee's decisionCleared from scrutiny
Document detailsDraft Commission Regulation on emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles
Legal baseArticle 15 of Regulation (EC) No. 715/2007
DepartmentTransport
Document number(36571), —

Summary and Committee's conclusions

9.1 The current EU requirements for the emission performance of light duty vehicles include a laboratory based test, in which the vehicle is driven according to a well-defined drive cycle. This is based on a cycle first used in the 1990s, representing a simplified, but repeatable, driving pattern, and it was considered that a vehicle which performed well in the test also performed well when driven on the road. However, concerns have grown that modern vehicles are designed to comply under the limited laboratory test conditions, and that the test results may no longer reflect actual performance. In particular, real world test results have shown that, whilst most pollutants are well controlled, the emission of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from diesel vehicles is much higher than might be expected on the basis of the laboratory tests.

9.2 Although we have not seen an official text, the Government has told us that the Commission is proposing to enact a Regulation which would introduce into the regulatory approval regime a new procedure for assessing the tail-pipe emissions from light duty vehicles. This will require for the first time that the vehicle manufacturer demonstrates that these emissions are controlled under a wide range of real driving conditions, whilst avoiding testing at unrealistic extremes. The Government recognises that emissions of nitrogen oxides in particular can have adverse health effects, and it therefore supports the measure. It also describes it as challenging for manufacturers, and will be exploring a number of ways in which the burden on industry might be reduced without diluting the air quality benefits.

9.3 This draft Commission Regulation, which is supported by the Government, does not appear to be controversial, and we see no reason to withhold clearance. However, it addresses an issue — namely the discrepancy between the results produced by the tests used to measure emissions and what happens under real driving conditions — which has attracted a measure of interest recently, and we are therefore drawing it to the attention of the House.

Full details of the document: Draft Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No. 715/2007 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 692/2008 as regards emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6): (36571),—.

Background

9.4 The current requirements for the emission performance of light duty vehicles are set out in Regulations (EC) No. 715/2007 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 692/2008, which form part of the wider type approval framework under Directive 2007/46, setting out the safety and environmental requirements which must be met before a vehicle can be placed on the market in the EU. The Regulations include a laboratory based test (known as the type 1 test), in which the vehicle is driven according to a well-defined drive cycle, with acceleration, braking, steady speed and stationary phases. The exhaust emissions are collected during the test, and must be below the regulatory limit value for each regulated gaseous pollutant before the vehicle can be approved.

9.5 The drive cycle is based on one first used in the 1990s, when emission standards were introduced, and is known as the new emission drive cycle (or NEDC). It represents a simplified, but repeatable, driving pattern, and it was considered that a vehicle which performed well in the test also performed well when driven on the road. However, as regulatory limits have been tightened and other pressures, such as CO2 targets, have been introduced, concerns have grown that modern vehicles are designed to comply under the limited laboratory test conditions, and that the test results may no longer reflect actual performance. These concerns have been confirmed since the advent of portable emission measurement systems (PEMS) which can be installed on a vehicle and driven on the road: real world test results have shown that, whilst most pollutants are well controlled, the emission of NOx from diesel vehicles is much higher than might be expected on the basis of the laboratory tests.

The current proposal

9.6 In order to address these concerns, the Commission is proposing to enact a Regulation under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny which would introduce into the approval regime a new procedure — a real driving emissions (RDE) test — for assessing the tail-pipe emissions from light duty vehicles (passenger cars and light vans). It supplements the existing approval tests for vehicle emissions, and will require for the first time that the vehicle manufacturer demonstrates that tail-pipe emissions are controlled under real driving conditions. A separate proposal will be made early in 2015 containing the compliance criteria for vehicles subjected to this test.

9.7 Although we have not seen an official text, the Government has told us that the vehicle manufacturer would be required to demonstrate that the emission control equipment continues to function effectively when a vehicle is driven on public roads under a wide range of conditions (i.e. motorway, urban, and rural routes, summer and winter conditions, laden and un-laden, and at sea level and altitude). However, to help constrain the amount of testing, certain boundary conditions — which would limit testing between temperatures from -7 °C up to 35°C and at altitudes up to 1300m — have been proposed, and are intended to ensure that all normal driving conditions are covered, whilst avoiding testing at unrealistic extremes. In addition, compliance will only need to be demonstrated at speeds up to 145kph (90mph), and, in order to minimise further the test burden, manufacturers will be permitted to define vehicle 'families' with similar engine characteristics, whilst having to demonstrate that a proportion of these vehicles are compliant to obtain approval for the entire family.

9.8 The requirements will apply to new vehicle types from September 2017, and all vehicles placed on the market will need to comply from September 2018. As an interim measure, manufacturers will be required to carry out tests during a monitoring period from the end of 2015 and publish the results. However, the compliance criteria will not apply in this period, which is intended to allow manufacturers and approval authorities to gain the necessary experience to apply the new test procedure.

9.9 The new test will apply to both spark ignition (petrol) and compression ignition (diesel) engines, and initially only NOx will be subject to compliance criteria, in recognition of the current difficulties which many Member States have meeting their air quality targets for nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which is a component of NOx. Portable measuring equipment capable of measuring particulates with sufficient accuracy will not be available when the test is first introduced, and will be introduced at a later date: and, although carbon monoxide will be monitored and may be included in the future, there are currently no exceedances for this pollutant in the EU. Likewise, hydrocarbons will not be monitored as the equipment needed to measure them safely is not available, though a test procedure may be proposed in the future.

9.10 The test will complement rather than replace the existing laboratory-based test procedure, which, despite its limitations, the Government describes as a controlled and repeatable test, which will remain as the only method for assessing carbon dioxide emissions (which will not be measured during an RDE test). The Government adds that the existing test will also ensure that steps continue to be taken to control pollutants not assessed by the RDE test, but that it will be amended under separate proposals to improve the drive cycle and remove known flexibilities.

The Government's view

9.11 In her Explanatory Memorandum of 15 December 2014, the Minister of State at the Department for Transport (Baroness Kramer) notes that road transport is considered to be the single largest source of NOx, representing a third of all such emissions. She adds that, at high levels, NO2 causes inflammation of the airways, and that long-term exposure may affect lung function and respiratory symptoms, as well as enhancing the response to allergens in sensitive individuals, with NOx also contributing to the formation of secondary particles and ground level ozone, both of which are associated with ill-health.

9.12 The Minister says that the Government supports the Commission's proposal, and sees it as an important step towards helping the UK to meet its air quality targets, where (unlike other pollutants) complying with the requirements for NO2 is proving challenging, especially in cities and urban environments. She adds that the timetable set out above for the introduction of RDE is also challenging for vehicle producers, but necessary to ensure that the UK is able to meet its air quality targets at the earliest opportunity. However, she also suggests that there is scope to reduce the burden on industry without diluting the air quality benefits.

9.13 In particular, she points out that:

·  the range of test conditions proposed may be too wide, certainly from the UK perspective, in that, whilst testing at low temperatures is necessary to ensure pollution control equipment performs adequately over both winter and summer conditions, -7 °C is extreme and unlikely to bring significant environmental benefits, whereas testing down to 0 °C would ensure that emissions are controlled under most driving conditions;

·  whilst a small but significant proportion of vehicles are driven at speeds above 70 mph and there is evidence that vehicle emissions can be high at these speeds, the proposal to require compliance at speeds up to 90 mph is above the national speed limit, and it must be clear that any testing carried out in the UK must respect national speed limits: manufacturers will therefore need to satisfy themselves that they comply with the higher speeds using track-based testing or by carrying out high speed tests in countries where such speeds on public roads are permitted;

·  the proposal to group vehicles into families with similar engine and powertrain characteristics will further reduce the burden on vehicle manufacturers by minimising testing to that necessary to give a reasonable certainty of compliance for all vehicles in the family: however, as a safeguard, the manufacturer must test a minimum number of vehicles from a family representing the extremes of performance (in terms of power, weight, engine capacity, etc), and an approval authority may request any vehicle within a family to be tested;

·  whilst current concerns centre on the high emissions of NOx from diesel engines, the technology-neutral approach under which both petrol and diesel engines are within the scope of the proposal will ensure the compliance of future technologies as well as addressing the current concerns; and

·  the proposal is likely to be disproportionately burdensome for small manufacturers which do not have the resources to complete all the required testing prior to approval, and, as vehicles produced by low volume manufacturers represent a very small proportion of the vehicle fleet, their contribution to air quality is not significant: additional provisions, such as longer lead times, should therefore be included for them.

9.14 The Minister also points out that the Commission is content that the proposal is supported by the impact assessment it prepared for the introduction of Regulation (EC) No. 715/2007, which assumed that manufacturers would install the technologies needed to give real world compliance. She believes that this view is broadly correct, and says that the UK's impact assessment presented prior to the adoption of the Regulation was drawn up on the same basis.

Previous Committee Reports

None.


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 23 December 2014