Documents considered by the Committee on 17 December 2014 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


15 The functioning of the Schengen area

Committee's assessment Politically important
Committee's decisionCleared from scrutiny
Document detailsCommission Report: Sixth bi-annual report on the functioning of the Schengen area 1 May—31 October 2014
Legal base
Department

Document numbers

Home Office

(36541), 15783/14, COM(14) 711

Summary and Committee's conclusions

15.1 This is the Commission's sixth six-monthly report on the functioning of the Schengen area, covering the period from May to end October 2014. It provides an overview of the main trends and developments within the Schengen area to inform political and strategic discussion at Ministerial level. Although the UK remains outside the Schengen free movement area, and continues to exercise border controls on all individuals seeking entry to the UK, it has chosen to take part in those aspects of Schengen dealing with policing and law enforcement and is entitled to participate in political discussions on the overall functioning of the Schengen area.

15.2 Based on the findings in its report, the Commission highlights three areas which it considers merit further consideration by the Council and the European Parliament. These are:

·  the capacity of Member States and relevant EU agencies to manage a significant increase in irregular border crossings at the EU's eastern external land borders;

·  the need for further measures to strengthen the functioning of the Schengen area to take account of the situation in the EU's neighbourhood; and

·  Member States' experiences of using the Visa Information System (VIS) to identify undocumented migrants within the Schengen area for the dual purpose of handling asylum applications and initiating return procedures.

15.3 In this Report chapter, we briefly summarise the main findings of the Commission report and the Government's position as set out in the Explanatory Memorandum, provided by the Minister for Immigration and Security (James Brokenshire).

15.4 We note that the Commission report was discussed at the EU Justice and Home Affairs Council on 5 December. The Home Secretary's Written Ministerial Statement on the Council, published on 10 December, expressed the Government's "strong interest in the effective functioning of the Schengen area" and its commitment to "continue to work with European partners to tackle migratory pressures across the EU". The Home Secretary also emphasised "how the openness of the Schengen area and the principle of free movement continue to be exploited, for example by organised gangs and criminals, and how the EU needs to work harder to manage these risks and put the right safeguards in place".[58]

15.5 Whilst much of the Commission report concerns elements of the Schengen acquis in which the UK does not participate, we consider that it provides a useful strategic overview of the challenges facing Member States in managing migration at a time of increased migratory pressures at the EU's external borders and loss of life in perilous journeys across the Mediterranean, as well as the efforts being made at EU level to address these challenges. We agree with the Government that the efficacy of controls at the EU's external borders, the implementation of the EU's visa liberalisation policy, and the application of a range of measures intended to enhance security within the Schengen area, are likely to have some impact on migratory pressures at the UK's borders and on its own internal security. We therefore consider that the Commission report is likely to be of interest to the House.

15.6 We are content to clear the Commission report from scrutiny. In doing so, however, we remind the Government that we have asked previously for an update on the progress and outcome of a case brought by Spain in the Court of Justice to challenge arrangements for the UK to cooperate and exchange information with the EU's new border surveillance system, Eurosur. We have also asked the Government to inform us of any changes proposed by the Commission to Switzerland's association with the Schengen free movement area, following the outcome of the Swiss referendum in February 2014 calling for the introduction of immigration quotas. We look forward to receiving updates on both matters at the earliest opportunity.

Full details of the documents: Commission report: Sixth bi-annual report on the functioning of the Schengen area 1 May-31 October 2014: (36541), 15783/14, COM(14) 711.

Commission report on the functioning of the Schengen area

15.7 The Commission report reviews:

·  migratory pressures at the EU's external borders and migration flows within the Schengen area;

·  Member States' application of Schengen rules; and

·  the use of "flanking" measures, such as the Schengen Information System, Visa Information System, readmission and visa facilitation agreements, which are intended to enhance security within the Schengen area.

Migratory pressures at the EU's external borders

15.8 The Commission highlights two main developments during the reporting period: increasing migratory flows across the Mediterranean which reached their peak during the summer months; and significant secondary movement of migrants from Italy to other Member States within the Schengen area. These developments are reflected in a sharp increase in the detection of irregular border crossings by third country nationals at the external borders of the Schengen area — 81,270 from May to July 2014 compared with 31,406 for the same period in 2013 — with Italy reporting an unprecedented number of detections. Most of those detected or apprehended in Italy were from Syria and Eritrea.

15.9 The Central Mediterranean was the main route used by migrants, with a five-fold increase in detections from May to July 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The report suggests that the higher level of detections by Italy may be attributable to the search and rescue operation Mare Nostrum launched by the Italian Navy in October 2013. Detections have also doubled on the Eastern Mediterranean route compared to the same period in 2013, largely as a result of increased detections at the external borders of Greece. The number of detections at the external borders of Bulgaria remains stable. The third most frequently used route, via Apulia and Calabria, saw a nine-fold increase (totalling more than 13,000) in the detection of irregular border crossings. However, migratory flows along the Western Balkans route have decreased by almost three-fold as a result of a sharp drop in detections at Hungary's external borders.

15.10 The report notes that the Justice and Home Affairs Council is continuing to monitor implementation of the actions proposed by the Task Force for the Mediterranean to reduce migratory and asylum flows and prevent loss of life at sea. It also notes that Greece, Bulgaria and Italy have made considerable efforts to improve their asylum systems but adds that further efforts are required.

15.11 The crisis in Ukraine has not produced any significant changes in the number of detections of irregular border crossings at the external land border with the EU, but there has been a steady increase in asylum requests by Ukrainian nationals (more than 2,500 from May to July 2014, a twelve-fold increase compared with the same period in 2013), as well as some increase in the number staying irregularly within the EU.

15.12 The report recognises the threat posed by foreign fighters returning to the EU from Syria, but suggests that "the existing legal framework is well tailored to respond to this threat".[59]

Migration flows within the Schengen free movement area

15.13 The Commission reports an increase of around 35% in the number of irregular migrants detected within the Schengen area from May to July 2014, compared to the same period a year ago, with most apprehended in Sweden, Germany, France and Spain. FRONTEX has started to collect data on secondary movements within the Schengen free movement area, but the Commission notes that a number of Member States have either failed to submit relevant data or have provided incomplete data, making it impossible to trace migration routes.

15.14 During October 2014, the Mos Maiorum Operation sought to gather information on migratory flows over a fourteen-day period. The Commission expects to present the results of this operation, including information on the involvement of organised crime groups in the facilitation of irregular migration to the EU and illegal border crossings, in its next six-monthly report.

Application of the Schengen acquis by Member States

15.15 The Schengen Borders Code contemplates that individual Member States participating in the Schengen free movement area may, exceptionally, re-introduce temporary controls at their internal borders where there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security. Two Member States and one Schengen-associated country chose to do so for periods ranging between four and eight days in response to a terrorist threat (Norway), to host the G7 Summit (Belgium) and to host a visit of the US President (Estonia).

15.16 The report describes the Commission's efforts to monitor obstacles to free movement in border areas (such as additional police checks or disproportionate traffic flow controls) in order to ensure that they do not constitute systematic controls equivalent to border checks. Investigations are continuing in four cases concerning possible obstacles to fluid traffic flow in Austria, Belgium, Italy and Slovenia. The Commission has formally notified Germany that certain provisions of its Federal Police Law do not comply with the Schengen Borders Code.

15.17 The report notes that preparations have continued to enable the European Border Surveillance System (Eurosur) to be extended to all countries participating in the Schengen free movement area by 1 December 2014. All countries now have National Coordination Centres and work is underway to complete a Handbook containing technical and operational guidelines for implementing Eurosur during 2015. The Commission reports that satellite imagery obtained through Eurosur has enabled vulnerable migrants to be detected at sea and their lives saved.

15.18 The report contains details of alleged violations of Schengen rules which are currently under investigation by the Commission, including allegations of "push-back" practices at the external borders of Bulgaria and Greece which may contravene the principle of non-refoulement, and summary removals from Spanish territory (Ceuta and Melilla).

15.19 The Commission has made a further site visit to investigate complaints about excessive waiting times at the border between Spain and Gibraltar and issued further recommendations to improve the management of vehicle and passenger flows and tackle tobacco smuggling more effectively. The Commission says it will "continue to monitor the situation closely" at this border crossing point.[60]

15.20 The report briefly reviews the transposition and implementation of two Schengen measures concerning the return of illegal migrants and cooperation with neighbouring third countries to facilitate the movement of local border traffic (neither measure applies to the UK).

15.21 Turning to the application of the Schengen evaluation mechanism, the report notes that evaluations covering different aspects of the Schengen acquis have been carried out in Switzerland. It describes the progress made in preparing for the implementation of a new Schengen evaluation mechanism, agreed in 2013, and anticipates that the first evaluations will start in February 2015.

15.22 The report confirms that the Council has so far been unable to agree that controls at the EU's internal borders with Bulgaria and Romania should be lifted, despite concluding in June 2011 that both countries had fulfilled the criteria for full application of the Schengen acquis.

The use of flanking measures

15.23 The second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) became fully operational in May 2013 and has functioned smoothly. The report notes that there has been a significant increase in the use of the new functionalities provided by SIS II. Recommendations have been issued to Member States to strengthen security measures in relation to SIS II, and work is underway to accelerate the exchange of information on "alerts" concerning the routes used by terrorists (including foreign fighters) and mobile criminal gangs.

15.24 The Visa Information System (VIS), which stores and processes information on short-stay visas, is now operational in 16 world regions and, by the end of July 2014, had processed nearly nine million Schengen visa applications (of which around 7.5 million visas were issued). Although VIS is operating well, the Commission emphasises the importance of ensuring the quality of the data (including fingerprints) entered in the database. From 11 October 2014, the use of fingerprints to verify the identity of visa holders at Schengen border crossing points became mandatory, but the Commission notes that it is too soon to draw any conclusions at this stage on the implementation of this new requirement.

15.25 Turning to the EU's visa policy, the Commission notes that no Member State has sought to trigger the new visa suspension mechanism, following its introduction in January 2014. The mechanism is intended to be used as a last resort in the event of substantial increases in the number of irregular migrants or rejected asylum applicants from a visa-free third country. A visa reciprocity mechanism, also in force since January 2014, makes it easier for the EU to respond to the imposition of visa requirements on one or more Member States by a visa-free third country. The Commission reports that five Member States (Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland and Romania) have notified cases of non-reciprocity involving Australia, Brunei, Darussalam, Canada, Japan and the US. It has established regular tripartite meetings with the countries concerned to consider further steps to ensure full visa reciprocity as soon as possible.

15.26 The number of asylum applications lodged by individuals from the five visa-exempt Western Balkan countries, especially Serbia and Albania, increased by 40% from May to July 2014, compared to the same period in 2013. Germany remains the most affected Member State, handling 11,000 out of an EU-wide total of 15,000 applications during these three months, followed by Sweden, France and Belgium. Asylum applicants from the five Western Balkan countries constituted 10% of the total number of applicants for asylum in the Schengen area.

15.27 Finally, the report notes that the EU Readmission Agreement with Turkey entered into force on 1 October 2014. The EU visa liberalisation dialogue with Russia was suspended in March 2014, following Russia's violation of Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty. Moldovan citizens possessing a biometric passport have been entitled to visa-free entry to the Schengen area since April 2014, with no evidence of significant abuse recorded. Readmission and visa facilitation agreements with Azerbaijan entered into force on 1 September 2014, and negotiations have commenced with Belarus. In July, the Commission proposed a draft negotiating mandate for readmission and visa facilitation agreements with Tunisia and is also seeking Council approval to open negotiations for short-stay visa waiver agreements with 16 small Caribbean and Pacific island nations and the United Arab Emirates. The Commission reports that implementation of EU visa facilitation and readmission agreements with Georgia and Armenia is proceeding well.

The Minister's Explanatory Memorandum of 15 December 2014

15.28 The Minister for Immigration and Security (James Brokenshire) notes that the UK does not take part in the border and visa aspects of the Schengen acquis but participates in Council discussions and highlights two areas of particular interest for the UK: the impact on the UK's borders of illegal immigration transiting the Schengen area and UK participation in Frontex operations.

15.29 He expresses the Government's concern at the "continued increase" in the level of illegal migration to the EU, adding that the UK is:

    "engaged in a range of activity to address this issue, with a particular focus on efforts 'upstream' to improve cooperation with key countries of origin and transit and to tackle the root causes of illegal migration. The Government is also engaging with EU partners in view of shared concern about the number of European foreign fighters travelling to Syria and Iraq and the threat they pose upon their return."[61]

15.30 The Minister notes that secondary migratory movements within the Schengen area continue to have a significant impact on the UK's borders and welcomes efforts at EU level to understand and tackle this phenomenon more effectively.

15.31 The Minister explains that the UK is unable to participate formally in Eurosur, as it builds on elements of the Schengen acquis in which the UK is not entitled to take part, but considers it to be "an important tool for practical cooperation between Member States" and notes that it has already helped to save lives at sea while bolstering the EU's response to illegal immigration and cross-border criminality. He adds that the UK is able to cooperate with Eurosur and to exchange information on the basis of bilateral or multilateral agreements concluded with neighbouring Member States participating in Eurosur.[62]

15.32 Turning to the Commission's handling of complaints about delays at the border between Gibraltar and Spain, the Minister notes:

"The Government has been very clear that Spain's response to [the Commission's] border recommendations is not satisfactory and the European Commission itself has expressed its concerns about the lack of progress. We are continuing to work with the European Commission to ensure that Spain completes the required works, with minimal impact on existing traffic and within an agreed timeframe.

"By comparison, Her Majesty's Government of Gibraltar has acted swiftly to implement changes at its border with Spain, in response to its recommendations. These changes range from reducing the number of cigarettes allowed in the border area from 1,000 to 200 per person, through to infrastructure upgrades aimed at risk profiling travellers, including providing facilities for dedicated vehicle searches. The European Commission has welcomed the steps taken to date."[63]

15.33 The Minister expresses the Government's support for the work of the Council's Schengen Evaluation working group in its efforts to finalise visits under the old mechanism. He continues:

    "We are pleased that the majority of Member States completed their implementation of recommendations for improvement before the old mechanism expired. The retention of Member States' expertise in this area as a new advisory group to Ministers will assist in the smooth move from the old mechanism to the new Schengen Evaluation Mechanism, especially where work concerns the implementation of outstanding recommendations. Visits under the new Mechanism will begin in early 2015, including a revisit to Switzerland to assess SIS II implementation progress."[64]

15.34 The Minister reiterates the Government's position that Bulgaria and Romania have met the technical criteria for accession to the Schengen area, but adds:

"The UK does not have a vote on any decision to lift air and sea borders between Schengen States as we do not participate in the border elements of the Schengen acquis."[65]

15.35 He expresses the Government's commitment to connecting to SIS II as soon as possible, adding:

    "We have completed all the required tests and evaluations to join the system, and we expect to agree our SISII connection date early in the New Year."[66]

15.36 He notes that the UK has worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office in setting up the UK's SIS II infrastructure and that there will be regular reviews and audits once the UK has formally joined.

15.37 The UK does not participate in the Visa Information System (VIS) but the Minister considers that it is helpful in preventing abuse of the Schengen visa system. He notes that the UK has not opted into the EU Readmission Agreement with Azerbaijan or the negotiations with Belarus, but that it has opted into negotiations for an EU Readmission Agreement with Tunisia. He continues:

    "The UK does not participate in the visa element of the Schengen acquis and is therefore not directly affected by the reported developments with regard to Schengen visa facilitation agreements and visa liberalisation. However, given the impact on UK borders of Schengen visa liberalisation in the Western Balkans, the Government continues to make clear the need for proper safeguards to be incorporated into Schengen visa facilitation and liberalisation agreements."[67]

15.38 The Minister notes, finally, that the Commission report was discussed at the Justice and Home Affairs Council on 5 December 2014 and that the Home Secretary "stressed the need to work harder to tackle exploitation of the Schengen arrangements".[68]

Previous Committee Reports

None, but Fourth Report HC 219-iv (2014-15), chapter 13 (25 June 2014) is relevant.


58   Hansard, 10 December 2014, 42-48WS. Back

59   See p.3 of the Commission report. Back

60   See p.6 of the Commission report. Back

61   Para 18 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back

62   Para 25 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back

63   Paras 27-28 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back

64   Para 30 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back

65   See para 32 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back

66   Para 34 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back

67   Para 42 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back

68   Para 46 of the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 23 December 2014