Documents considered by the Committee on 25 February 2015 - European Scrutiny Contents


3 European aid to the most deprived

Committee's assessment Legally and politically important
Committee's decision(a) Cleared from scrutiny (b) Not cleared from scrutiny; further information requested
Document details(a) Draft Regulation on the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived; (b) Commission delegated Regulation laying down the content of the annual and final implementation reports, including the list of common indicators
Legal base(a) Article 175(3) TFEU; co-decision; QMV;

(b) Article 13(6) of Regulation (EU) No. 223/2014 on the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived

Department

Document numbers

Work and Pensions

(a) (34394), 15865/12 + ADDs 1-2, COM(12) 617

(b) (36240), 11741/14 + ADD 1, C(14) 4988

Summary and Committee's conclusions

3.1 A Regulation establishing a Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived ("the Fund") was adopted in March 2014. The Fund forms an integral part of EU Structural and Investment Funds for the period 2014-20 and is intended to contribute to the Europe 2020 poverty reduction target which seeks to lift at least 20 million people out of the risk of poverty and social exclusion by 2020. The objectives of the Fund are to alleviate poverty through the provision of food, clothing and other essential consumer goods and to support activities promoting the social integration of the most deprived. It is intended to complement action taken at national level to eradicate poverty and promote social inclusion.

3.2 The UK voted against the draft Regulation — document (a) — on the grounds that the proposed Fund was inconsistent with the principle of subsidiarity. In a subsequent Written Ministerial Statement to the House, the Government noted that both Houses had issued Reasoned Opinions and that the distribution of food and consumer goods to deprived people was "better and more efficiently delivered by individual Member States and their local authorities, rather than through EU programmes".[20]

3.3 Participation in the Fund is mandatory for all Member States, but the Government made clear that it would seek the minimum allocation possible — €3.5 million[21] for the period 2014-20 — in order to mitigate the impact of the Fund on the remainder of the UK's allocation of EU Structural and Investment Funds. By taking less, the Government will have more to spend on the broader objectives set out in these Funds, as well as greater flexibility to adjust expenditure to local needs and priorities.

3.4 We have repeatedly asked the Government to explain how it intends to use the UK's allocation of funding and, in particular, whether it proposes to provide direct material assistance to those in need (for example, through food banks) or to support broader social inclusion measures (and, if the latter, what type of measures are envisaged).[22] When we last considered the draft Regulation, at our meeting on 3 September 2014, we noted that the deadline for the UK to submit its operational programme specifying how it proposed to implement the Fund was imminent and again asked the Government how it intended to utilise the UK's allocation.

3.5 Document (b) is a Commission delegated Regulation establishing the information to be included by Member States in their annual reports on the implementation of the Fund, based on a list of common indicators. Although we do not routinely examine delegated legislation, we asked the Government to deposit the draft Commission Regulation for scrutiny as it provides a useful indication of the type of assistance that may be made available under the Fund and the categories of beneficiaries.

3.6 The EU Treaties specify that the delegation of powers to the Commission may only extend to measures supplementing or amending non-essential elements of the parent legislation, in this case the Regulation establishing the Fund.[23] We asked the Minister for Employment (Esther McVey) whether she was satisfied that the draft Commission delegated Regulation only concerned non-essential elements of the parent Regulation and whether she considered there were any grounds on which the Council or European Parliament might wish to raise an objection to prevent its entry into force.

3.7 The Minister refers us to a Written Ministerial Statement published last December which explains that the UK share of the Fund will be used to provide additional support for school breakfast clubs in England. We remind the Minister that the publication of a Written Ministerial Statement on an EU document which remains under scrutiny does not discharge her obligation to provide this Committee with a timely and informative response to questions raised during the course of our scrutiny. As she has now told us what the Fund will be used for in the UK, we agree to clear the draft Regulation — document (a) — from scrutiny.

3.8 Turning to the Commission delegated Regulation, which took effect on 26 November 2014, the Minister informs us that it "covers both essential and non-essential elements" of the parent Regulation (document (a)) and that the Government had raised "strong objections about the level of detail required and the administrative burden this would place on providers". As the Minister will be aware, delegated Commission acts may only "supplement or amend certain non-essential elements" of the parent legislation. We ask her to identify the "essential elements" to which her letter refers. We note that the Government is out of time to challenge the validity of the Commission delegated Regulation. We ask the Minister to explain the Government's reasons for not doing so. Meanwhile, document (b) remains under scrutiny.

3.9 We welcome the priority the Minister attaches to the effectiveness of her Department's internal scrutiny processes. We look forward to working with her officials to ensure that EU scrutiny procedures are well-understood across her Department and trust that the "additional checking mechanisms" put in place will ensure that there are no further scrutiny lapses.

Full details of the documents: (a) Draft Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived: (34394), 15865/12 + ADDs 1-2, COM(12) 617; (b) Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) No. 223/2014 on the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived by laying down the content of the annual and final implementation reports, including the list of common indicators: (36240), 11741/14 + ADD 1, C(14) 4988.

Background

3.10 Our earlier Reports, listed at the end of this chapter, provide a detailed overview of document (a), the Government's position, and the content of the Reasoned Opinion agreed by the House on 18 December 2012. Under the Regulation agreed in March 2014, Member States may use their allocation of funding to support national schemes for the distribution of food and other basic consumer goods (such as clothing, footwear, hygiene products, school equipment and sleeping bags) and/or to support broader social inclusion activities.

3.11 Document (b) sets out the content of the annual implementation reports to be submitted by each Member State based on a list of common indicators. These require Member States to identify the amount of funding dedicated to the provision of food and to the provision of other basic material assistance, as well as the types and quantities of food or other assistance provided. National implementation reports must also identify the number of people receiving assistance from the Fund and, amongst these, the number falling into the following categories: children under the age of 16; adults over 65; women; migrants and ethnic minorities; disabled people; and the homeless. In addition to this information, the final implementation report in 2024, and the annual reports submitted in 2017 and 2022, must include an assessment of the contribution the Fund has made towards promoting social cohesion, enhancing social inclusion, and alleviating poverty.

3.12 The draft Commission Regulation is dated 17 July 2014. It entered into force on 26 November 2014, following the expiry of a two-month period in which either the European Parliament or the Council (by a qualified majority) were able to raise an objection.

The Minister's letter of 9 February 2015

3.13 The Minister first apologises for the delay in providing the information requested in our earlier Reports and describes the steps being taken within her Department to improve internal scrutiny processes. She says that a new team took over responsibility for Departmental scrutiny of EU business last November and has "overhauled and streamlined our internal scrutiny database and introduced additional checking mechanisms for Scrutiny Coordinators". She adds:

"Please note, the DWP takes scrutiny seriously and the issues raised […] are being treated as a key priority and have been escalated to the highest levels within the Department, including discussion with the Secretary of State."

3.14 Turning to the questions we raised in our Ninth Report, agreed on 3 September 2014, the Minister notes that the Minister for Schools (Mr David Laws) published a Written Ministerial Statement on 18 December 2014 (reproduced as an Annex to this chapter) explaining that the UK planned to use the UK's allocation of the Fund to provide additional support for school breakfast clubs in England.[24] With regard to the Commission delegated Regulation, she says that it:

"covers both essential and non-essential elements of the Regulation establishing the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived. It was negotiated in the EU Working Group and the UK, along with several other Member States, raised strong objections about the level of detail required and the administrative burden this would place on providers. While the Commission conceded that in some Member States the collection of some personal data was unlawful, the bulk of the requirements remain in the Regulation that was agreed."

Previous Committee Reports

Twenty-second Report HC 86-xxii (2012-13), chapter 3 (5 December 2012); Fourteenth Report HC 83-xiv (2013-14), chapter 10 (11 September 2013); Twentieth Report HC 83-xix (2013-14), chapter 3 (30 October 2013); Twenty-ninth Report HC 83-xxvi (2013-14), chapter 8 (8 January 2014); and Ninth Report HC 219-ix (2014-15), chapter 12 (3 September 2014).

Annex

"The Minister for Schools (Mr David Laws): The Government plan to use the UK share of the fund for European aid to the most deprived to provide additional support for school breakfast clubs in England. Under the plans, which will be led by the Department for Education, this money would be allocated to schools with particularly high rates of disadvantage, as measured by free school meal eligibility.

"We believe that breakfast clubs effectively target help to many of the most deprived children—providing nutritious meals in some of the poorest areas, supporting academic attainment, promoting healthy eating habits at a young age and saving families money. This funding would be in addition to existing support provided by the Government—we have already committed just over £1 million over two years to support an expansion of breakfast clubs in poor areas.

"The UK's allocation is worth €3.96 million (or £3.1 million) over seven years from 2014 to 2020, and can be used to deliver one or more of the following: food aid for the most deprived people; consumer goods for homeless people; consumer goods for children; and non-labour market social inclusion activities for the most deprived. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland decided not to participate, due to the small sums involved and the administrative effort required. The allocation has been deducted from the UK's structural fund allocation—European social fund and European regional development fund.

"This use of the fund for European aid to the most deprived is subject to final agreement with the European Commission, and will be managed in accordance with the fund's stringent eligibility, accounting and evidence requirements.

"A copy of the draft operational programme can be found online at http://www.parliament.uk/writtenstatements."


20   HC Deb, 18 March 2014, 58WS. Back

21   The figure given is in 2011 prices. Back

22   Letter of 30 April 2014 from the Chair of the European Scrutiny Committee to the Minister for Employment (Esther McVey). Back

23   See Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).  Back

24   HC Deb, 18 December 2014, 122WS. Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2015
Prepared 6 March 2015