UK Government policy on the Kurdistan Region of Iraq - Foreign Affairs Contents


3  The UK, Iraq and the Kurdistan Region

18. The UK has been more than a bystander to the history outlined in the previous chapter. The UK is the midwife of modern Iraq: it was the UK that in 1921 decided to unite into one state the three Mesopotamian vilayets (governorates)—Mosul, Baghdad, and Basra—that it held under a League of Nations mandate following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War One. Shia and Sunni Arabs, Kurds, and smaller communities were thus melded into one nation. This in itself has drawn criticism; in any discussion of Iraq's troubled history, the charge that the UK (with the connivance of the other great powers of the time) created an "artificial" or weak state—perhaps deliberately so, so as to weaken the Arab people or the Ummah (the community or "nation" of Islamic believers)—is still sometimes levelled.[10] It has been a feature of ISIL propaganda.[11]

19. It was also the UK's decision that Iraq should be a monarchy ruled by a Sunni king and that its political class should be dominated by Sunni Arabs, the community which Foreign Office policymakers at the time considered the most politically mature, and with whom they could most readily do business. This was not good news for Iraq's Kurds[12] and, with hindsight, can be seen as setting a precedent of minority Sunni Arab rule that would last almost continuously until Saddam's overthrow in 2003.[13] It may partially explain why Iraq has struggled ever since to forge a transcendent, unifying national identity, and also explain (though not excuse) Iraq's slide towards sectarian autocracy under Nouri al-Maliki, a long-delayed pendulum swing towards Shia majoritarian rule after decades of Sunni-led authoritarianism.

The UK and Iraq's Kurds

20. The UK was definitely no friend of Kurdish nationalism during the period in which it had significant influence in Iraq, which lasted up until the republican coup of 1958. Kurdish uprisings were crushed, whilst the UK put no pressure on the Iraqi government to implement 1925 League of Nations recommendations on the status of Kurds in the Mosul vilayet. This has not been forgotten in Iraqi Kurdistan, nor the collapse in 1923 of the Treaty of Sèvres, which had laid out putative proposals for the creation of an independent Kurdish state, in what is now south-east Turkey or the UK's role in the Sykes-Picot agreement, to divide much of the Middle East into French, British and Russian spheres of influence, with no proposal for a Kurdish state. (The agreement has not been forgotten in Baghdad or other Arab capitals either.) It should be added that the Sykes-Picot plan, which would have split what is now Iraq in two, was never implemented (though the concept of French and British spheres of influence in the Middle East survived), and that Sèvres did not collapse because of the machinations of the UK or other European powers, but because of Turkey's victory in its War of Independence—in which, as it happens, many Ottoman Kurds fought for the Turks. The UK also mulled at length over the status of the Mosul governorate of Iraq because of its strong Kurdish character,[14] and gave serious thought to uniting it with the new Kurdish state envisaged at Sèvres. When the UK finally decided, in 1925, that Mosul should remain part of Iraq, this decision aligned with UK interests at the time, but also followed the recommendations of a League of Nations commission. We make these comments to underline that, whilst UK policy at the time may legitimately be seen as flawed, and to have either created or exacerbated problems that have still not been solved today, the UK—even at the height of its imperial powers in the early 20th century—took decisions on the shape and future of Iraq not in a vacuum but in response to events on the ground over which it may have had little or no control. In a report published in 2015, it is necessary to underline these points because of the extent to which this history is still being contested in modern Iraq.

From the Baathist era to the present day

21. If Iraqi Kurds today take a largely positive view of the British, it is in large part thanks to the UK's more recent record.[15] From the late 1970s, the UK began to acquire a reputation as a safe haven for Kurds (and other Iraqi dissidents) forced into exile by the increasingly brutal rule of Saddam Hussein. These exiles include several among the current generation of Kurdish leaders or their children. (Today there are thought to be tens of thousands of Kurds living in the UK, although many will be of Turkish origin. Over two out of every three Iraqi Kurds studying abroad are studying in the UK.[16]) The UK also takes much credit from Iraqi Kurds for another safe haven: that set up under UN auspices in 1991, and which ultimately evolved into today's Kurdistan Region.[17] The UK's key role in the creation and policing of the zone is still remembered with much gratitude, as we noted on our visit to the Region. The UK is also thanked for the behind-the-scenes role our diplomats and politicians played in brokering peace and restoring trust after KDP-PUK relations violently collapsed in the mid-90s.[18] There is also the 2003 Iraq War: it divides Iraqis as it divides the UK, but for Kurds it was a war of liberation and the UK was on the right side.[19]


10   See also London Kurdish Institute (KUR 7), paragraph 7 (providing a Kurdish rather than Arab perspective) Back

11   ISIL released a video titled The End of Sykes-Picot in late June 2014, around the same time that it proclaimed a new caliphate straddling the Iraq-Syria border ("ISIS declares Caliphate in Iraq and Syria", The Guardian, 30 June 2014)  Back

12   We acknowledge the view of one of our witnesses, Dr Ali Allawi (a biographer of Iraq's first king) that Kurdish leaders had had a voice within the political system during the monarchical period: it was after the 1958 revolution that Kurds (and Shia) became increasingly marginalised. (Q124) Back

13   See also Peter Galbraith (KUR 017), paragraph 7 and London Kurdish Institute (KUR 7), paragraph 2 Back

14   Mosul was by far the most ethnically mixed of the three vilayets. Kurds were the largest ethnic grouping in Mosul although they may not have been in the majority. Back

15   Q8 [Professor Gareth Stansfield]; APPG Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KUR 12) , paragraph 4 Back

16   KRG High Representative to the UK (KUR 15), paragraph 45; APPG Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KUR 12), paragraph 15 Back

17   Q11 [Professor Gareth Stansfield]; KRG High Representative to the UK (KUR 15), paragraph 9; Professor Gareth Stansfield (KUR 14), paragraph 1 Back

18   Professor Gareth Stansfield (KUR 14), paragraph 3 Back

19   KRG High Representative to the UK (KUR 15), paragraph 9 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2015
Prepared 21 January 2015