Police Information Notices - Home Affairs Contents


Conclusions and recommendations


1.  The issuing of Police Information Notices is an operational matter left up to each force, which has resulted in examples of inconsistent use between forces, as well as within forces themselves. There is no sharing of information between police forces on PINs, which strongly undermines Chief Constables' ability to assess their forces' usage. Each force should publish the number of PINs issued on their websites on a monthly basis. The Home Office should collate and publish annual data about the number of PINs issued by each force, including the number of cases in which repeat victimisation was reported following the issuing of a PIN, and the number of prosecutions that followed. This will enable Chief Constables to see how their force compares to other forces. (Paragraph 5)

2.  The lack of any procedure for appealing against a PIN can feel very unfair to recipients. As already specified in the guidance, the intended recipient of a PIN should at least be given the opportunity to give their account of the situation before a police decision is made on the issuance of a PIN. This is not happening in many cases at the moment. Each police force should provide details of the complaints process to recipients alongside the original PIN. Each police force should provide a monthly list of the number of PINs issued, alongside details of the complaints process, on their website. (Paragraph 7)

3.  PINs can be a useful tool for stopping harassment, meeting the needs of the victim and addressing problematic behaviour. However, there is a clear danger that they may be used inappropriately if they are not done in conjunction with good risk assessment and sufficient investigation. It is vital that police forces provide further guidance and training to officers on the appropriate use of PINs, highlighting in particular that the use of a PIN is generally not appropriate where an investigation has established evidence of a course of conduct. Remedial courses should also be given to police officers who have used PINs inappropriately. The ACPO and College of Policing review of practice advice should take these issues into account. We hope that our successor Committee will monitor the issue of PINs to assess whether these improvements take place. (Paragraph 12)



 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2015
Prepared 8 March 2015