16- to 18-year-old participation in education and training - Public Accounts Contents


2  Managing risks and barriers

Apprenticeships

9. The Department for Education, with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, are reforming apprenticeships in line with recommendations from this Committee and the Richard Review of Apprenticeships.[17] They are making apprenticeships longer and involving employers more in designing and running them, including by getting employers to set standards. These changes should improve the quality of apprenticeships. In future, all apprenticeships will last at least a year; include English and maths for those without at least a GCSE grade C in these subjects; and end with an assessment of full competence.[18] Already the number of young people aged 16 to 18 starting apprenticeships of 12 months or more has increased, from 62,300 in 2010/11 to 110,900 in 2012/13.[19]

10. However, the total number of new apprentices aged 16 to 18 fell from 131,700 in 2010/11 to 114,500 in 2012/13. Provisional numbers for 2013/14 show a small increase to 117,800, but this is still 11% below the peak. The Department told us that that there was a balance to be struck between the quantity and quality of apprenticeships. It had consciously decided to reduce the total number of apprenticeships in order to achieve greater quality, including by ending a previous initiative called Programme-led apprenticeships, which took place in simulated workplaces.[20]

11. We were concerned that, in future, small businesses might be put off taking on apprentices and that this might further reduce the overall number of apprenticeships. Only 29% of firms that employ under 50 people currently provide apprenticeships. But the new model, which places more responsibility on employers, may be inherently unattractive to such firms, especially if they perceive that the administrative burdens and costs of having an apprentice will increase.[21] We highlighted the example of hairdressers and beauty therapists. These companies find it extremely difficult to provide the resources necessary to support an apprenticeship, even with the help of Government grants.[22] The Departments told us they were working to reduce administrative burdens for smaller businesses. On funding, the Government said it would be paying £2 for every £1 that the private sector put into apprenticeship training, and that additional funding would be available for small businesses specifically, as well as for businesses that took on younger people. For example, it told us that the Apprenticeship Grant for Employers provided £1,500 for smaller businesses to take on their first two apprentices. The Departments were also trialling their new funding arrangements in order to improve their understanding of how employers would react to them in practice.[23]

Travel costs

12. Since 2011/12, the Department has had a Bursary Fund worth some £180 million. Young people who are eligible for the fund may use it to pay for things like transport, clothing, books and other equipment. For young people in some areas, however, we found that all the bursary would have to be spent on transport.[24] Local authorities must have a transport policy setting out their arrangements to support 16- to 18-year-olds to access education and training. But this policy does not have to include providing financial assistance and the National Audit Office found that in 63 local authorities, where transport costs were relatively high, young people did not get such assistance.[25] The average bursary is £445 a year, but in local authorities including Suffolk, Norfolk, Hampshire, Northumberland and Oxfordshire the typical charge for bus travel was over £500 a year.[26]

13. We were concerned that the law now required young people to stay in full-time education or training until they were 18, but that many of these young people would have to pay for their travel, unlike under-16s.[27] We asked the Department whether it had evaluated the impact on participation of local authorities' transport polices. It told us that it did not know enough about individual local authorities' arrangements, and committed to look into this important issue further.[28]

Careers advice

14. Over time many different approaches to careers advice have been tried and have not worked. In September 2012, the Department introduced a new statutory duty for schools to provide independent and impartial advice. Prior to this, local authorities had provided careers advice through the Connexions service, which central government funded. In 2010, the Government stopped the Connexions service and transferred responsibility to schools, without transferring the funding. The Department said that it withdrew the funding deliberately as part of wider Government efforts to reduce the deficit.[29]

15. We asked the Department to explain its rationale for giving schools the role of providing independent careers advice. We were particularly worried that schools with sixth forms had a vested interest in holding onto their students post-16, because they are a source of revenue, and that this would therefore compromise any advice they gave. Additionally, we felt that staff in small schools might lack the breadth of skills and knowledge to advise students well and that there might be too little involvement from employers. We have received evidence that only 17% of 11- to 16-year-olds have heard of apprenticeships.[30] Meanwhile, Ofsted found in September 2013 that just 12 out of 60 schools it visited were ensuring all students received sufficient information to consider a wide breadth of career possibilities.[31]

16. The Department told us that its evidence showed that careers advice worked best as part of daily school life, rather than being a service brought in from outside.[32] However, the Department accepted that the performance of schools in this area was still patchy. It pointed out that Ofsted found some schools that were doing very well and said that it wanted to build on this. Following the Ofsted report, the Department re-issued its guidance.[33] It told us that it expects to make further improvements to careers advice in future.[34] It said that the "destination measures" it was developing for secondary schools (data that track what young people go on to do after leaving education) would help to demonstrate where careers services were good and enable it to hold schools.



17   Q 113;The Richard Review of Apprenticeships, November 2012; Committee of Public Accounts Report, Adult Apprenticeships, Session 2010-12, HC 1875, May 2012 Back

18   C&AG's Report, para 3.10 Back

19   C&AG's Report, Figure 13. Back

20   Q 134; C&AG's Report, Figure 13 Back

21   Q 122 Back

22   Submission from London College of Beauty Therapy Back

23   Qq 126 and 129 Back

24   C&AG's Report, paras 14, 2.18 Back

25   C&AG's Report, paras 2.24-2.25 Back

26   Q 95; C&AG's Report, para 2.25 and Figure 9 Back

27   Qq 99-101  Back

28   Qq 90; Written evidence from DfE  Back

29   Q 41; C&AG's Report, para 2.9 Back

30   Q 46; Submission from Association of Colleges Back

31   Qq 38 and 48; C&AG's Report, para 2.10 Back

32   Q 42  Back

33   Qq 47 and 51 Back

34   Q 44 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2015
Prepared 22 January 2015