1 Pressures on the financial sustainability
of the NHS
1. On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and
Auditor General, we took evidence from the Department of Health
(the Department), NHS England, Monitor and the NHS Trust Development
Authority on the financial sustainability of NHS bodies.[1]
We also took evidence from Barking Havering and Redbridge University
Hospitals NHS Trust, Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group, Medway
Clinical Commissioning Group and University Hospitals Coventry
and Warwickshire NHS Trust.
2. In 2013-14, the Department allocated £95.2
billion to NHS England to pay for NHS services.[2]
NHS England is responsible for commissioning primary care and
specialised services, and is accountable to the Department for
its spending.[3] On 1 April
2013, 211 clinical commissioning groups replaced ten strategic
health authorities and 151 primary care trusts to take responsibility
for commissioning most healthcare services from community, secondary
and specialist providers.[4]
NHS England allocated £65.4 billion to clinical commissioning
groups in England to commission health care services, on behalf
of their local populations, from 98 NHS trusts and 147 NHS foundation
trusts.[5] Monitor regulates
NHS foundation trusts, and another new body, the NHS Trust Development
Authority, supports NHS trusts that are yet to achieve foundation
status.[6]
3. The NHS must be financially sustainable in the
medium to long term for it to provide sustainable services to
patients. Key tests of financial sustainability include changes
in the surplus or deficit of the NHS as a whole and the number
and scale of organisations in financial distress.[7]
However, the financial health of NHS bodies has worsened. Between
2012-13 and 2013-14, the net surplus of NHS commissioners, foundation
trusts and NHS trusts decreased from £2.1 billion to £722
million.[8] The percentage
of NHS trusts and foundation trusts in deficit increased from
10% in 2012-13 to 26% in 2013-14; and nearly a quarter of clinical
commissioning groups ended the 2013-14 financial year with a less
favourable financial position than they planned.[9]
The Department issued £1.8 billion of cash support to NHS
trusts and NHS foundation trusts between 2006-07 and 2013-14 to
help them meet their operational cash needs.[10]
4. At the end of September 2014, 80% of NHS foundation
trusts that provide acute hospital services were reporting a deficit.[11]
Both Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
and University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust told
us that one of the main reasons for the increasing number of acute
providers in deficit is the payment system for emergency admissions.[12]
Providers are paid 30% of standard prices for all emergency admissions
above 2008-09 levels, whereas the number of emergency admissions
has increased by 48% over the last 15 years.[13]
In December 2013, Monitor and NHS England reviewed the emergency
payment system and concluded that adjustments to the baseline
should be made when providers faced significant increases in the
number of emergency admissions.[14]
Monitor told us it believed admissions would have increased even
faster had the 30% rate not been in place, but accepted that there
were problems with the payment system that still needed to be
addressed.[15] Monitor
and NHS England noted that they had begun a review of the payment
system, and planned to update the 2008-09 baseline next year.[16]
Monitor and the NHS Trust Development Authority assured us that
planned changes would result in fewer acute trusts in deficit.
In the interim we heard that, for example at Coventry and Warwickshire
University Hospitals NHS Trust, the hospital and clinical commissioning
group had made a local agreement to pay for emergency admissions
at 2013-14 activity levels, and this was helping to address the
financial challenges the hospital faced.[17]
5. The Department's policy is that commissioning
bodies should invest the remaining 70% of the tariff for emergency
admissions into improving patient care outside hospital settings,
to help reduce the number of inappropriate hospital admissions.
However, alternatives to hospital care, including enhanced primary
care services and discharge from emergency departments into community
care, are not always available.[18]
Monitor accepted that much more transparency was needed around
how the remaining 70% was actually spent and whether this was
helping to reduce unnecessary hospital admissions.[19]
6. The Department told us that, between 2012-13 and
2013-14, the amount the NHS spent on temporary medical staff increased
from £2.1 billion to £2.6 billion.[20]
Many acute providers are facing cost pressures because they have
a shortage of permanent consultants, particularly in accident
and emergency departments.[21]
For example, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals
NHS Trust told us that it had a 50% shortage of emergency consultants
and was spending £1.5 million a month on temporary staff.
It said it paid £110 an hour for some locum emergency consultants
working a 16 hour shift, whereas the basic starting salary for
a permanent emergency consultant was around £75,000.[22]
It costs the taxpayer £400,000 to train an emergency consultant,
but some consultants were choosing to leave the NHS to become
professional temporary staff.[23]
7. We asked the Department about its strategy for
reducing the impact on providers' costs of hiring temporary staff.
It told us that it was developing a toolkit to share with providers,
which aimed to predict volume so that providers could ensure they
recruit enough employees to meet the numbers needed.[24]
The Department said it was also considering ways of lowering the
price of agency staff.[25]
For example, the Department explained that it was considering
how to use its national purchasing power and position as the main
buyer of medical staff from the agency market to achieve a better
price.[26] While the
Department has a framework contract that seeks to achieve the
best price possible by gaining sufficient volumes, some agencies
do not take part in the framework.[27]
NHS England also said it must ensure that it fills the increased
number of training places in emergency medicine, to help address
the shortage in emergency consultants.[28]
8. According to the Department, 31% of providers
have a private finance initiative (PFI) scheme, and the NHS spends
a total of £1.8 billion each year on PFI payments.[29]
The National Audit Office noted in its report that organisations
with the highest capital charges, as a proportion of income, were
the most likely to report weak financial results in 2013-14.[30]
Four out of six trusts with deficits greater than £25 million
had a PFI scheme.[31]
Some trusts have improved their financial position by refinancing
their PFI. For example, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation
Trust, which plans to deliver a £21.5 million surplus in
2014-15, arranged a loan with Northumberland County Council to
buy out its PFI scheme.[32]
The Department said the capital cost of refinancing PFI schemes
would be significant and that it would not be appropriate in all
cases to consider refinancing, but told us it was considering
options for doing this, where appropriate, in a way that provides
value for money.[33]
One option it was exploring was renegotiating 'soft facilities
management services', such as catering, cleaning or security,
which make up a large cost of some PFI schemes.[34]
- NHS England told us that the parts of the country
that have deep financial pressures
1 C&AG's Report, The financial sustainability
of NHS bodies, Session 2014-15, HC 722, 7 November 2014 Back
2
C&AG's Report, para 3 Back
3
C&AG's Report, paras 1.2, 1.4 Back
4
C&AG's Report, para 1.2 Back
5
C&AG's Report, paras 3, 1.5 Back
6
C&AG's Report, para 1.4 Back
7
C&AG's Report, para 1 Back
8
C&AG's Report, paras 5, 1.5 Back
9
C&AG's Report, paras 1.7, 2.9 Back
10
Q 241; C&AG's Report, para 3.6 Back
11
Qq 124-128 Back
12
Qq 6, 11, 52 Back
13
National Audit Office, Emergency admissions to hospital: managing
the demand, Session 2013-14, HC 739, 31 October 2013 Back
14
C&AG's Report, para 2.7 Back
15
Qq 99-101 Back
16
Qq 101-102, 107 Back
17
Qq 7-10 Back
18
C&AG's Report, para 2.7 Back
19
Q 101 Back
20
Q 143 Back
21
Q 16 Back
22
Qq 64-65, 74, 76, 78 Back
23
Qq 86-90, 147 Back
24
Qq 142, 144 Back
25
Q 144 Back
26
Q 148 Back
27
Q 145 Back
28
Q 152 Back
29
Q 181 Back
30
C&AG's Report, para 2.16 Back
31
C&AG's Report, para 2.15 Back
32
Qq 181; C&AG's Report, para 2.17 Back
33
Qq 181-182,184 Back
34
Q 183 Back
|