7 Transparency
66. The information available on public bodies is
patchy: the National Audit Office reported that in 2012-13, 40%
of non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) made the minutes of
their board meetings available to the public, and just 19% held
board meetings open to the public.[170]
There was no improvement on these measures between 2011-12 and
2012-13. The Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council, however,
despite having been absorbed into the Ministry of Justice in August
2013, nonetheless published an annual performance report for 2013-14.
It was under no obligation to do so, but responded to urging from
this Committee in Future oversight of administrative justice,
published in March 2012.[171]
67. Transparency takes different forms. 'Useful'
transparency may also include "what the [arm's length body]
is there for; how it is governed; how it makes decisions; how
well it performs and how to access or complain about its activities".[172]
Members of the public in England now have the right to film, blog
and tweet in council meetings, but no equivalent regulation applies
to public bodies.[173]
The Cabinet Office told us there are situations where holding
a board meeting in public may not be appropriate, particularly
if the sensitivity of the discussion would mean a public meeting
would not be in the public interest.[174]
68. We learned that there is also a lack of information
on which functions are carried out by public bodies. As the National
Audit Office reported in February 2014, "there is no information
on the total number of functions carried out at arm's length,
either in 2010 or now".[175]
Jonathan Isaby of the TaxPayers' Alliance argued that the Government
ought to hold information on all bodies which receive public funding,
including, for example, public corporations.[176]
The Cabinet Office does not oversee or maintain records of the
creation of local bodies, public corporations or public companies,
unless they are also NDPBs.[177]
69. The Cabinet Office are trying to improve the
transparency of public bodies. Nick Hurd MP told us they are making
transparency "a more emphatic and important part of the triennial
review process".[178]
70. Published documents set out the accountability
arrangements for public bodies and government departments, such
as 'framework agreements.' Accountability arrangements for NHS
England, the largest public body, were summarised for us by the
Department of Health.[179]
The Department's Permanent Secretary, Una O'Brien, gave us a 300
word answer. In short, she told us that the Department of Health
sets NHS England's objectives, and holds it to account via a document,
the 'mandate', and regular private meetings. The minutes of these
meetings are made public. She wrote afterwards with more information,
acknowledging that the system is complex, as it involves a number
of bodies performing different but connected roles, but describing
one system with responsibility ultimately delegated from the Department.[180]
The Department's Accounting Officer responsibilities statement
sets out how it holds its public bodies to account. It was published
in October 2014, updating the previous version published in September
2012.[181] The document
describes the Department as a 'system steward' which acts, where
necessary, 'as a national coordinating mechanism'.[182]
Professor Ham, speaking to us before this publication, said that
clarity in health accountability was improving.[183]
71. Sometimes disagreements between central Government
and public bodies are aired in public, and other times they are
discussed privately. For example, the Chief Inspector has stated
that Ofsted should inspect academy chains; the then Secretary
of State for Education Michael Gove MP disagreed.[184]
More often, though, chairs of public bodies do not consider it
their role to publicly criticise ministerial decisions on their
policies and budgets.[185]
One of our witnesses, Rob Whiteman, former UK Border Agency Chief
Executive, disagreed with 'secrecy' of this kind. Making a wider
point about open policy making, he argued that there "would
be benefit from more transparency about the options considered,
prior to delivery initiation, of the advice given on costs, risks
and appraisal of policy options."[186]
Unlike in public bodies, disagreements between Permanent Secretaries
and Ministers can be made public through the publication of letters
of direction, where officials request written direction from Ministers
to proceed with a policy. It is worth noting however that no letters
of direction have been issued under the current Government.[187]
72. We welcome the greater transparency provided
in the 'Public Bodies' publication and Whole of Government Accounts.
However, the information available on public bodies remains patchy,
as does information on functions previously performed by public
bodies but now in-house. Many public bodies undermine open Government
and public confidence by failing to hold public meetings or to
publish the minutes of their meetings.
73. Accountability documents should be free from
jargon and set out in simple and graphic form. Each government
department must improve its written statements on accountability
arrangements, to make them clear, understandable, and up to date.
To achieve this, the statements should be written in plain English
with simple organisational charts showing lines of accountability.
The Cabinet Office should oversee this work and report on progress
in its annual reports.
74. In the interests of transparency, each public
body should publish an up-to-date statement of their accountability
arrangements in their annual reports and on their websites, like
those published by government departments. The Cabinet Office
should oversee and report on progress on this.
75. The Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council
was absorbed into the Ministry of Justice in August 2013 but nonetheless
published an annual performance report for 2013-14. This should
be the case for others: the operating units of government departments
should produce annual reports and accounts, to enable both ministers
and Parliament and the public to hold them to account. The Cabinet
Office should ensure transparent information is published on the
effectiveness of functions, wherever these functions are performed.
With good management information, this should be straightforward.
76. As in meetings of local authorities, members
of the public should have the right to film, blog and tweet during
public meetings of arm's-length bodies. Ministers in sponsor departments
should hold public bodies to account for failing to hold public
meetings or publishing the minutes of their meetings, and provide
an explanation of how this is being addressed in departmental
annual reports.
77. Chairs of public bodies should be able to
ask for a letter of direction from the relevant minister, in the
event that they feel their public body is being required to do
something that is not value for money. This should be copied to
the Chair of the relevant select committee.
170 As above Back
171
Public Administration Select Committee, Twenty First Report of
Session 2010-12, Future oversight of administrative justice: the proposed abolition of the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council,
HC 1621 Back
172
Public Chairs Forum and Institute for Government, Transparency in arm's length bodies: a guide to best practice,
2014 Back
173
Department for Communities and Local Government press release,
Press freedom boosted by new 'right to report', August 2014 Back
174
Cabinet Office (QPB27) Back
175
National Audit Office, Progress on public bodies reform,
HC (2013-2014) 1048 Back
176
Q101 Back
177
National Audit Office, Progress on public bodies reform,
HC (2013-2014) 1048 Back
178
Q456 Back
179
Q294 Back
180
Department of Health (QPB25) Back
181
Department of Health, DH Accounting Officer responsibilities statement,
October 2014 Back
182
As above, p5 Back
183
Q253 Back
184
Q237 [Baroness Morgan of Huyton] Back
185
Professor Skelcher, Dr Dommett and Dr Tonkiss (QPB13) Back
186
Rob Whiteman (QPB21) Back
187
Institute for Government, Leading Change in the Civil Service,
March 2014 Back
|